Witnesses Corroborating Rodriguez's Claims?

[Coffee]

I had a moment of insight and figured out what you guys are good at and how that should be reflected in what I write here (and by "you guys" I mean the "regulars" on this board): you are good at debunking. I'll bet you guys could debunk the blue out of the sky. Ever try debunking an engine, because I certainly haven't. Everyone has to be good at something, I suppose. With that crystal clear revelation firmly in mind, I understood the proper relationship I can have with this thread: You are all amazingly good at debunking, and i am amazingly good at asking questions. Some have said I am annoyingly good at asking questions. So from now on, I ask, and You debunk. Even if I find I don't agree with your debunkinations, I can take those debunkination techniques and share them with the strategists at the less organized, yet much more fun "Loose Change." By the way, big props to Totovader for being as annoyingly good at debunkination as I am at asking questions.

Thus, I no longer have an opinion, just questions.

And I don't actually have any questions right at this specific moment either. Strangely enough, I don't think about 9/11 every waking moment. It's my understanding the Republicans are drafting a bill to make that illegal, but I doubt it will pass.

You were transparent from the beginning. Your JAQ bull was obvious. You have no credibility. Your arguments are crap. You may think your use of italics is clever but it's not. It's an old device used by many who where much better at it than you. You fail at 9/11 facts. Go have fun at "Loose Change". You belong there.

 

[stateofgrace]

I had a moment of insight and figured out what you guys are good at and how that should be reflected in what I write here (and by "you guys" I mean the "regulars" on this board): you are good at debunking. I'll bet you guys could debunk the blue out of the sky. Ever try debunking an engine, because I certainly haven't. Everyone has to be good at something, I suppose. With that crystal clear revelation firmly in mind, I understood the proper relationship I can have with this thread: You are all amazingly good at debunking, and i am amazingly good at asking questions. Some have said I am annoyingly good at asking questions. So from now on, I ask, and You debunk. Even if I find I don't agree with your debunkinations, I can take those debunkination techniques and share them with the strategists at the less organized, yet much more fun "Loose Change." By the way, big props to Totovader for being as annoyingly good at debunkination as I am at asking questions.

Thus, I no longer have an opinion, just questions.

Can anybody translate this into understandable English?

Just asking a question.

 

[AZCat]

Can anybody translate this into understandable English?

Just asking a question.

(bolding mine)


Aaaaaaahhhh!

 

[thewholesoul]

hey thxs a million smith

 

[A W Smith]

hey thxs a million smith

I have no doubt that theres a million smiths in my metropolitan area

 

[LashL]

I no longer have an opinion, just questions.

Is there an appropriate smiley (or YouTube video) for the Eureka moment when a JAQer admits that he's just JAQing off?

 

[Totovader]

brasil - If you "just have questions", then I suggest that you visit the links provided in the sticky section of this forum. You will garner a lot more respect by doing your own research, instead of pretending that "asking questions" is a skill which demands respect, and then claiming that JAQing off is the same as critical thinking.

 

[Totovader]

hey totovader.

so if i space it out and paragraph it etc, which i had done on word documnet but when i copy and pasted it onto this forum it just came out like you know what, you will respond?but i do apologise. however it is still legible.

It's not legible- it's a pain in the rear to read. I'm not going to keep fixing your posts for you in reply.

Several people have already explained the quote function to you- you need to at least get that down before you post again.

 

[DavidJames]

Can anybody translate this into understandable English?

Just asking a question.

Brasil figured out people here are smarter, have more education and more experience then him in every subject in which he thought he was knowledgable. So rather then continue to look foolish he decided to adopt the same technique as most other CTists who frequent these forums, name JAQs.

I figured he'd commit suicide by mod first, but live and learn.

 

[TjW]

I had a moment of insight and figured out what you guys are good at and how that should be reflected in what I write here (and by "you guys" I mean the "regulars" on this board): you are good at debunking. I'll bet you guys could debunk the blue out of the sky. Ever try debunking an engine, because I certainly haven't. Everyone has to be good at something, I suppose. With that crystal clear revelation firmly in mind, I understood the proper relationship I can have with this thread: You are all amazingly good at debunking, and i am amazingly good at asking questions. Some have said I am annoyingly good at asking questions. So from now on, I ask, and You debunk. Even if I find I don't agree with your debunkinations, I can take those debunkination techniques and share them with the strategists at the less organized, yet much more fun "Loose Change." By the way, big props to Totovader for being as annoyingly good at debunkination as I am at asking questions.

Thus, I no longer have an opinion, just questions.

And I don't actually have any questions right at this specific moment either. Strangely enough, I don't think about 9/11 every waking moment. It's my understanding the Republicans are drafting a bill to make that illegal, but I doubt it will pass.

What you're amazingly bad at is listening to answers.

 

[thewholesoul]

AZ CAT, A W Smith, old tiger club, beachnut

just a quick question. i am curious to know what is your causal explanation behind morilli's first event i.e. "the impact of the explosion" which threw him to the ground?

do you agree with totvader.

thxs

 

[thewholesoul]

It's not legible- it's a pain in the rear to read. I'm not going to keep fixing your posts for you in reply.

Several people have already explained the quote function to you- you need to at least get that down before you post again.

point taken amigo.

you see i got the hang of this part its spliting the quotes is the problem but a z smith helped me out with that so i should be ok in the future.

what would you say if i broke it into three posts and then sent it again?

 

[thewholesoul]

I have no doubt that theres a million smiths in my metropolitan area

well i was in such a good mood i just want to thank them all

 

[Totovader]

point taken amigo.

you see i got the hang of this part its spliting the quotes is the problem but a z smith helped me out with that so i should be ok in the future.

what would you say if i broke it into three posts and then sent it again?

Have a ball.

 

[thewholesoul]

Nominated.

BTW, hell of a job in the thread Toto. You have more patience than I...

hey calcas, i was meaning to ask you if you agreed with totovaders causal explanation in relation to morilli's testimony in which he describes hearing the impact of an explosion which threw him to the floor?

do you agree that this event was the result of the plane impacting the north tower?

or do you have a different explanation behind the event?

 

[thewholesoul]

Have a ball.

so thats a yes then? i will assume it is.

 

[Totovader]

hey calcas, i was meaning to ask you if you agreed with totovaders causal explanation in relation to morilli's testimony in which he describes hearing the impact of an explosion which threw him to the floor?

do you agree that this event was the result of the plane impacting the north tower?

or do you have a different explanation behind the event?

You're inventing strawmans, again- thewholsoul.

Please quote where I said that Morelli's was knocked to the ground by hearing an explosion.

This is why it's so important for you to stop ignoring the question I had in regards to the sequence of events. You try so hard to pick apart different aspects that you lose focus of what your task is really supposed to be. Instead of making your case, you're scrambling to find plot holes and inconsistencies- scrambling so hard that you slip up and invent your own.

 

[thewholesoul]

:

It's also complete nonsense. With everything humans study, once we remove the impossible what remains is a range of possibilities that varies from small to enormous.

Excellent post, Toto.

hey gravy, i am curious as to whether you agree with totvaders causal explanation behind morilli's experience i.e. that he was thrown to the ground by the impact of a plane above?

i was under the impression you had a different explanation. was i wrong? or am i to assume that you share the same causal explanation as totvader?

take it easy

 

[thewholesoul]

You're inventing strawmans, again- thewholsoul.

Please quote where I said that Morelli's was knocked to the ground by hearing an explosion.

This is why it's so important for you to stop ignoring the question I had in regards to the sequence of events. You try so hard to pick apart different aspects that you lose focus of what your task is really supposed to be. Instead of making your case, you're scrambling to find plot holes and inconsistencies- scrambling so hard that you slip up and invent your own.

ok but you would accept that he was thrown to the ground resulting from the impact of the plane - i mean that is your position right?

 

[Totovader]

thewholesoul- What is the purpose of you harassing everyone to side with me?

Your curiosity has absolutely no bearing on this discussion- especially in regards to you making your case.