Split Thread WTC7 collapse (again) - split from: How did you rule out that 911 was an insid

[Miragememories]

For me it was just so obvious that the collapse of WTC7 was a controlled demolition that I knew it couldn't be a conspiracy.

I mean how could the perps expect expect intelligent people to observe that collapse and not do a Dan Rather and say that looked like a controlled demolition?

There must have been explosives of something stored there by the CIA right?

I mean "too funny".

I mean what idiot would believe some debris damage and subsequent fires would result in a collapse like that?

The CIA must have badly stored some explosives and it's just a big coverup for their incompetence...right?

MM

 

[technoextreme]

I mean what idiot would believe some debris damage and subsequent fires would result in a collapse like that?

After seeing the damage caused by fire in WTC 5 I thought what idiot wouldn't believe that it could happen. And it's not like I didn't believe it was true before the fact. It just really hit the point.

 

[Miragememories]

After seeing the damage caused by fire in WTC 5 I thought what idiot wouldn't believe that it could happen. And it's not like I didn't believe it was true before the fact. It just really hit the point.

Yes WTC5 was a mess wasn't it?

BUT!

It didn't collapse!

MM

 

[Par]

Yes WTC5 was a mess wasn't it? BUT! It didn't collapse!

Nor was it forty-seven stories tall.

 

[Arus808]

Yes WTC5 was a mess wasn't it?

BUT!

It didn't collapse!

MM

actually it did, just not on 9/11/2001

 

[Miragememories]

Nor was it forty-seven stories tall.

The old "size is everything" argument.

So at what height does it matter Par?

MM

 

[Pookster]

Yes WTC5 was a mess wasn't it?

BUT!

It didn't collapse!

MM

One of my ex-boyfriend's apartment was a mess.

BUT!

It didn't collapse either!

 

[Pookster]

The old "size is everything" argument.

So at what height does it matter Par?

MM

The old "apples are really oranges" argument.

So at what point does your comparison actually matter MM?

 

[Pookster]

Nor was it forty-seven stories tall.

The devil is in the details, isn't it?

 

[uk_dave]

For me it was just so obvious that the collapse of WTC7 was a controlled demolition that I knew it couldn't be a conspiracy.

I mean how could the perps expect expect intelligent people to observe that collapse and not do a Dan Rather and say that looked like a controlled demolition?

There must have been explosives of something stored there by the CIA right?

I mean "too funny".

I mean what idiot would believe some debris damage and subsequent fires would result in a collapse like that?

The CIA must have badly stored some explosives and it's just a big coverup for their incompetence...right?

MM

oh boy.

It was 'obvious' eh?

In that case, why can't everyone else see it? Or are you just so very 'special' but oh so modest that you don't like to be 'obvious' about your special abilities?

Or is your contention that everyone does see it but that the perps have managed to hide the evidence?

Of course, if that's the case then we're back in the realms of 'everyone was in on it' because it's not just the US media which has to hide the wtc7 collapse, it's the media all over the world. And it's not just the media but it's also the US politicians in opposition to the republicans who'd just love to have something with which to get rid of bush.

So, MM, no, to normal, rational people...people who understand that on a day such as 9-11 when two massive structures collapsed chaotically next to another major structure which then burned for many hours, the fact that it collapsed is not really very surprising at all.

Let's face it MM, you and your fellow 'truthers' were so out of touch with reality that you formed a belief based on your very first erroneous opinion and have now spent several years desperately trying to confirm that belief in the face of logic, evidence and knowledge.

Soon it will be time to admit, to yourself if no one else, that you are wrong. Move on. Do something constructive. Drop 'footprint', 'thermite' and 'gravity' into casual conversation if you must. At least then your time as a 'truther' won't have been totally wasted.

 

[Miragememories]

One of my ex-boyfriend's apartment was a mess.

BUT!

It didn't collapse either!

Well there ya go.

MM

 

[Miragememories]

The old "apples are really oranges" argument.

So at what point does your comparison actually matter MM?

No!

Apples and bigger apples.

You didn't answer my question.

How big an apple do you figure Pookster?

MM

 

[Par]

So at what height does it matter Par?

At what height does what matter?

 

[TheRedWorm]

Hey MM,

What evidence convinced you that 9/11 was an inside job? Was it merely questions, or was it something more substantial? Please elaborate, if you don't mind.

 

[Pookster]

Well there ya go.

MM

My point exactly.

 

[Pookster]

No!

Apples and bigger apples.

You didn't answer my question.

How big an apple do you figure Pookster?

MM

Nope. Apples and oranges. You're quite familiar with that type of comparison, so don't be afraid of the question. At what point does the comparison actually matter?

 

[Miragememories]

oh boy.

It was 'obvious' eh?

In that case, why can't everyone else see it? Or are you just so very 'special' but oh so modest that you don't like to be 'obvious' about your special abilities?

Or is your contention that everyone does see it but that the perps have managed to hide the evidence?

Of course, if that's the case then we're back in the realms of 'everyone was in on it' because it's not just the US media which has to hide the wtc7 collapse, it's the media all over the world. And it's not just the media but it's also the US politicians in opposition to the republicans who'd just love to have something with which to get rid of bush.

So, MM, no, to normal, rational people...people who understand that on a day such as 9-11 when two massive structures collapsed chaotically next to another major structure which then burned for many hours, the fact that it collapsed is not really very surprising at all.

Let's face it MM, you and your fellow 'truthers' were so out of touch with reality that you formed a belief based on your very first erroneous opinion and have now spent several years desperately trying to confirm that belief in the face of logic, evidence and knowledge.

Soon it will be time to admit, to yourself if no one else, that you are wrong. Move on. Do something constructive. Drop 'footprint', 'thermite' and 'gravity' into casual conversation if you must. At least then your time as a 'truther' won't have been totally wasted.

Well Dave I understand where you are coming from.

In this world you never get everyone to agree but that certainly doesn't equate to everyone agreeing with you now does it Dave?

We all know a great many people agree with me.

But yes, some people agree with you.

"logic, evidence and knowledge" clearly suggest the collapse of WTC7 was a controlled demolition.

Danny Jowenko, an expert on the subject, which you aren't, agrees!

NIST, 6+ years later is still stalling on a final explanation and rumour has it that they might "cop out" and not present a final report at all!

MM

 

[Par]

"logic, evidence and knowledge" clearly suggest the collapse of WTC7 was a controlled demolition. Danny Jowenko, an expert on the subject, which you aren't, agrees!

I look forward to his paper on the subject.

 

[Par]

The old "size is everything" argument.

So, physical size doesn’t matter. Therefore, bashing toy cars together is likely to yield valuable automobile crash-test safely information.

 

[Miragememories]

I look forward to his paper on the subject.

Well Par if you have equal credentials, you can contradict him right here and now?

MM