What is good about religion?

The number of people is irrelevant

Appeal To Widespread Belief (Bandwagon Argument, Peer Pressure, Appeal to Common Practice):



However, if you know WHY "so many religious people testify about the good that religion brings" AND their reasons are valid, please do tell us

This is not quiet an appeal to widespread belief. Because I have an assumption that people realize what they are going through. Therefore religious people should know the effect on religion upon them, thus they are "experts" on the effects of religion. Ergo, this is not merely an appeal to widespread belief.
 
Ergo, this is not merely an appeal to widespread belief.

Perhaps... it's impossible to tell, considering that you seemed to have omitted one salient point:
  • you have yet to identify 'What is good about religion'

_______________________________________
ETA: Please note: the following points do NOT identify 'What is good about religion'
  • ...religion sets an ideal for you
  • ...You make churches -> at churches you preach about doing good -> and so in the end people do more good
  • ...As to prayer... you feel an inspiration to go and help other
simply because the 'benefits' can (and are) realised more efficiently by alternative means
 
Last edited:
Perhaps... it's impossible to tell, considering that you seemed to have omitted one salient point:
  • you have yet to identify 'What is good about religion'

People would not testify that is good to them if that had not been true.
 
Perhaps... BUT... you are still yet to identify 'What is good about religion'

If it is true that people would not testify that religion is good to them if that had not been true, then I do not have to identify what is that is good in it.

If the above is true, it identifies that something is, and I do not need to identify it.
 
So you are saying that religious people are brainwashed into believing that religion is good for them?

Can you provide evidence for that?

When Saint Ignatius Loyola, Founder of the Jesuits said "Give me a boy until he is seven-years-old and I will give you the man.".... Brainwashing was exactly what he was speaking of.

Perhaps also a more modern example: When evangelicals teach that even doubting the truth of the holy spirit is immediate and un-appeal-able grounds for eternal damnation, it is either true or the most horrendous brainwashing imaginable. You don't have to guess what my opinion is.
 
Last edited:
If it is true that people would not testify that religion is good to them if that had not been true, then I do not have to identify what is that is good in it.

If the above is true, it identifies that something is, and I do not need to identify it.

Perhaps you do not need to identify it

However... this is a site for scepticism and crtical thinking and, before your extraordinary claim is entertained (let alone accepted), you will have to provide some evidence

Othrewise your argument will be regarded as nothng more than the naive rantings of an ignorant troll

Please note: your claim has been made zillions of times before and NEVER has it been substantiated
 
If it is true that people would not testify that religion is good to them if that had not been true,

There is no reason to think this is true. (at least, the meaning I take from that garbled mess is not true)
 
I'm interested in those who can tell me if he missed any thing good about religion.


One more thing, by my accounting: A really great thing about basing your model of reality on delusional silliness is that the weird, painful, destructive, cruel and nasty results of your perverse worldview don't have to make sense. For all the Inquisitions and burnings and purges and hatred and waste and repression and failure and G.W.B's that seem to tag along with Faith like an ugly girlfriend, you don't even need to apologize. You are forgiven. Undeniably cool.
 

Back
Top Bottom