• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

In You Face (Barack Muslim Rumors)

Do you have any comment about my first, and more relevant, point?

Not really, I put a disclaimer in the opening post addressing that. This thread was merely pointing out that my claim in the last thread about these rumors was very valid as it turns out after all.
 
Not really, I put a disclaimer in the opening post addressing that. This thread was merely pointing out that my claim in the last thread about these rumors was very valid as it turns out after all.

I don't know what "last thread" you are talking about or what you claimed in it, but nothing in the OP article supports your OP claim that:
I being the skeptic I am, suggested that it was also likely the source of these internet spams could be Hillary supporters since that is the person with the most to gain.
 
Not really, I put a disclaimer in the opening post addressing that. This thread was merely pointing out that my claim in the last thread about these rumors was very valid as it turns out after all.

If you forward spam, you are not the source.
 
If you forward spam, you are not the source.

Hair splitting. I'll edit the opening post to clear this up for you and Upchurch. If you get a spam, whoever sent it is the source, although not necessarily the original author as in this case.

Edited to Add: I think you are confusing the journalism definition of source. If my online pharmacy sends an advert to a nefarious CN spam house, you will get spam from the CN house. The CN house is the source of your spam although not the author.
 
Last edited:
Hair splitting. I'll edit the opening post to clear this up for you and Upchurch. If you get a spam, whoever sent it is the source, although not necessarily the original author as in this case.

Corplinx, congratulations on being the source for that article.
 
Hair splitting. I'll edit the opening post to clear this up for you and Upchurch. If you get a spam, whoever sent it is the source, although not necessarily the original author as in this case.
Well, that isn't the entirety of my problem with using this article to back your claim. These are contemporary events that you are using to justify claims of actions that took place nearly a year earlier.

Now, you may very well be correct, but the OP article doesn't show that.
 
Okay, so this is a rip from a Wikipedia article, but it's the best I could do on short notice:


In Chapter 6 of the book, titled "Faith," Obama writes that he "was not raised in a religious household." He describes his mother, raised by non-religious parents, as detached from religion, yet "in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I have ever known." He describes his Kenyan father as "raised a Muslim," but a "confirmed atheist" by the time his parents met, and his Indonesian step-father as "a man who saw religion as not particularly useful." The chapter details how Obama, in his twenties, while working with local churches as a community organizer, came to understand "the power of the African American religious tradition to spur social change." Obama writes: "It was because of these newfound understandings—that religious commitment did not require me to suspend critical thinking, disengage from the battle for economic and social justice, or otherwise retreat from the world that I knew and loved—that I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity United Church of Christ one day and be baptized."
 
Last edited:
Okay, so this is a rip from a Wikipedia article, but it's the best I could do on short notice:

That would be perinnent to the content of the email, but this thread is all about corplinx wanting us to suck his balls.

Frankly, I'm surprised the mods haven't had anything to say about a thread dedicated to soliciting oral sex.
 
Well, that isn't the entirety of my problem with using this article to back your claim. These are contemporary events that you are using to justify claims of actions that took place nearly a year earlier.

Now, you may very well be correct, but the OP article doesn't show that.

The thread was a few weeks back and Cleon,Chaos,Imaginary took me to task over suggesting that Hillary Supporters may be spamming these messages. I stood by that suggestion as at least equally as valid as assuming it was right wing whackos. I'm glad to be vindicated.
 
That would be perinnent to the content of the email, but this thread is all about corplinx wanting us to suck his balls.

Frankly, I'm surprised the mods haven't had anything to say about a thread dedicated to soliciting oral sex.

I used the word bells. Get your mind out of the gutter. Its Christmas time. jingle jingle.
 
The thread was a few weeks back and Cleon,Chaos,Imaginary took me to task over suggesting that Hillary Supporters may be spamming these messages. I stood by that suggestion as at least equally as valid as assuming it was right wing whackos. I'm glad to be vindicated.


You claimed the Clinton campaign was the source. So far no evidence has arisen that the anyone in the Clinton campaign wrote it, or that any attempt at mass-emailing (being a source for spam) was made my any staffers or volunteers involved. One volunteer was asked to leave for having forwarded it eleven times. Other volunteers were also let go for having fowarded it. You are not vindicated. You are grasping at straws.

EDIT: It should hardly come as a suprise that supporters of Obama's opponents might forward it of their own volition. Your crowing about the Clinton campaign policing itself to purge any hint that it was involved in dsitributing that email is very low. It's actually rather professional of them.
 
Last edited:
The thread was a few weeks back and Cleon,Chaos,Imaginary took me to task over suggesting that Hillary Supporters may be spamming these messages. I stood by that suggestion as at least equally as valid as assuming it was right wing whackos. I'm glad to be vindicated.
Oh, I didn't know we were talking that recently. "A while back" is such a subjective term. My mistake, my apologies.
 
You claimed the Clinton campaign was the source. So far no evidence has arisen that the anyone in the Clinton campaign wrote it, or that any attempt at mass-emailing (being a source for spam) was made my any staffers or volunteers involved. One volunteer was asked to leave for having forwarded it eleven times. Other volunteers were also let go for having fowarded it. You are not vindicated. You are grasping at straws.

You are grasping at straws to keep from retracting accusing me of merely trying to smear Hillary.

In the original thread, the person didn't even receive a mass message. They were forwarded the spam by their mother. In this threads opening post I went out of my way to mention that there is no evidence of a Hillary campaign worker mass-mailing. However, you are unhealthily obsessed with author vs. source and forward vs mass mail.

We now know that Hillary supporters were spreading these emails. I made what I never claimed to be more than a speculative guess that Hillary supporters could be behind the spreading of these mails and it turns out to be true. You claimed I merely was trying to smear Hillary.

This is the part where you agree that I was right and we get on with our day.
 
Last edited:
You are grasping at straws to keep from retracting accusing me of merely trying to smear Hillary.

We now know that Hillary supporters were spreading these emails. I made what I never claimed to be more than a speculative guess that Hillary supporters could be behind the spreading of these mails and it turns out to be true. You claimed I merely was trying to smear Hillary.


You were, and you still are. You claimed that the Hillary campaign was the source. That is unsubstantiated. That some Hillary supporters forwarded the email is hardly shocking news. You are now not only wrong, but also vainly trying to avoid the facts.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom