Do over savaged by no planer on youtube

Gravy said:
Yawn. Put up or shut up, Xena. Shall I start that thread, or will you be an adult and do so?
Click to expand...
I find you rather rude and disrespectful Mark Roberts. What happened to being "an all around good guy"? If I offended you by asking if the "Mark Roberts Appreciation Thread" was a joke, then I apologize.

As far as starting a new thread, go for it Mark. I have no intention of wasting my time debunking your debunking though. I am an activist, not a researcher. What is important is that you enjoy your efforts and feel that you are making a positive contribution to society. What difference does it make if I like your work or think that it is driven by emotion? If you insist, however, I would be happy to review any research you send me and provide a thoughtful and objective critique. Do keep in my that I work full time and have a life.

If you are going to start the thread though, how about you title it " The Mark Roberts Depreciation Thread?"
 
XenaWarriorPrincess said:
I find you rather rude and disrespectful Mark Roberts. What happened to being "an all around good guy"? If I offended you by asking if the "Mark Roberts Appreciation Thread" was a joke, then I apologize.
Click to expand...
Put up or shut up is not an insult or being rude, it's just an expression.

And, true to twoofer form, you use your phony righteous indignation to be able to keep responding without actually addressing the question/task put before you... which is "what has Gravy gotten wrong/start a thread listing his mistakes."

And yeah, dodging those the way you have while trying to claim the moral high ground is indeed childish.
 
Last edited:
XenaWarriorPrincess said:
As far as starting a new thread, go for it Mark. I have no intention of wasting my time debunking your debunking though. I am an activist, not a researcher.
Click to expand...

So you don't do any research of your own? You don't look things up for yourself when someone makes an outrageous claim? Some wanker spends several hours looking at neo-nazi websites, comes up to you and says "9-11 was an inside job." and you just picked that up and ran with it?

Could you be more reckless and irresponsible?
 
how about this... cause watching this unfold is like watching two of my friends asking me to beat the other one up...

someone, anyone, I don't give a rat's infected testicle who does.. but there needs to be at LEAST a thread started where Xena says "Mark, i think you are wrong on Point X" and then Gravy comes along and presents his case. Xena takes said info and presents a counter argument with her supporting case. and so on and so forth until at the very end they agree to disagree (which is what's going to happen anyway) and we do it all without name calling, questioning one's mental capacity, sexual orientaion, job, or accusing one of recreational drug use.

I like Xena, I like Gravy, and I recommend this simply because I refuse to take sides just because one doesn't like the other
 
I've started a thread inviting Truthers to show me any factual error Mark has made. Any at all. Just "Mark said X, but the truth is Y, and here's the proof."

I also warned them that anything they post will be checked for accuracy and context. We'll see what happens.
 
CptColumbo said:
He looks like Bill Nye.
Click to expand...


nye.gif




or


Stilesr.jpg
 
Unsecured Coins said:
how about this... cause watching this unfold is like watching two of my friends asking me to beat the other one up...

someone, anyone, I don't give a rat's infected testicle who does.. but there needs to be at LEAST a thread started where Xena says "Mark, i think you are wrong on Point X" and then Gravy comes along and presents his case. Xena takes said info and presents a counter argument with her supporting case. and so on and so forth until at the very end they agree to disagree (which is what's going to happen anyway) and we do it all without name calling, questioning one's mental capacity, sexual orientaion, job, or accusing one of recreational drug use.

I like Xena, I like Gravy, and I recommend this simply because I refuse to take sides just because one doesn't like the other
Click to expand...

I like you too.... you are my favorite skeptic ever!!! And this point, you will be the only skeptic I ever respect. :(
 
Unsecured Coins said:
how about this... cause watching this unfold is like watching two of my friends asking me to beat the other one up...

someone, anyone, I don't give a rat's infected testicle who does.. but there needs to be at LEAST a thread started where Xena says "Mark, i think you are wrong on Point X" and then Gravy comes along and presents his case. Xena takes said info and presents a counter argument with her supporting case. and so on and so forth until at the very end they agree to disagree (which is what's going to happen anyway) and we do it all without name calling, questioning one's mental capacity, sexual orientaion, job, or accusing one of recreational drug use.

I like Xena, I like Gravy, and I recommend this simply because I refuse to take sides just because one doesn't like the other
Click to expand...

My sympathies to you, UC, for being involved with X in some way and the dilemma that you seem to think you face, but it is obvious that he/she has brought absolutely nothing to the table and has said nothing of substance whatsoever, so expecting Mark (or anyone else) to get into a debate with him/her is ridiculous.

The evidence, being X's posts to date, indicates that X is incapable of presenting anything even remotely resembling facts or evidence, and incapable of even presenting an argument, so what on earth do you expect Mark (or anyone else, for that matter) to respond to?

X doesn't seem to know what an argument is, doesn't seem to know what debate is, and doesn't seem to be able to even buy a clue.

X has not presented anything at all of substance to date, hasn't even presented a point of view or an opinion, let alone a fact, but has only sniped at Mark and others, without ever offering a single point of discussion that involves any facts whatsoever.

While I sympathize in light of your friendship with X, I can't see how that should or would result in serious and intelligent people wasting their time trying to engage in a serious debate with someone who can't even state a claim or put forward a position.
 
Last edited:
Killtwon is an obvious sociopath, as evidenced in his treatment of Val McCaltchey, and now, I have recieved evidence that he is a Holocaust denier and an anti-Zionist. That alone does not make him a Nazi, but, if he mentions Mossad as a possible actor in the events of 9/11, he joins the ranks of those blaming our misfortunes on "der ewige Jude." He would thus be aligning himself with the people I would eventually have to hunt down and "neutralize" should there be any attempt to overthrow the existing social order.

Should the full-dress RaHoWa come to pass, they must be neutralized with extreme prejudice, for the good of humanity.

Once was one bloody time too many.
 
Just to follow up, it seems that genghis has taken note of our comments. I will let someone more familiar with the Aussie dialect comment on his comments. I can't really make out much of what he is saying. Is that because he is babbling or because I don't comprehend what he is saying?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-5LXbLH5_I

If anyone does care to respond directly to him, I would recommend a bit of tact. This may be one very fragile personality.
 
leftysergeant said:
Just to follow up, it seems that genghis has taken note of our comments. I will let someone more familiar with the Aussie dialect comment on his comments. I can't really make out much of what he is saying. Is that because he is babbling or because I don't comprehend what he is saying?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-5LXbLH5_I

If anyone does care to respond directly to him, I would recommend a bit of tact. This may be one very fragile personality.
Click to expand...

Hes clearly hurt by people suggesting he may be a deluded and rather sad person who spams his insanity on youtube from his little car studio.
I feel really bad for starting this thread now.
:)
 
R.Mackey said:
Hard to tell if he's serious, but that's what he said.

He also said that "bullets have sharp points" and are "solid objects," and that's why they can blast through steel. Oy vey.

One of the better steel-destroying rounds available to an ordinary civilian is this little number, which as you can see, is neither sharp nor solid, though admittedly it is more solid than an airplane. I've seen these penetrate a full inch of steel at 200 meters, where their impact velocity was roughly equal to that of UA175...

So why does it work? Why this bullet, and not others? Easy. Lots of momentum. Sectional density (e.g. small cross-section) helps, but there's no substitute for raw momentum. A blob of Jell-O equal in size and speed to the aircraft would have sheared perimeter columns, no matter what mentally unstable videographers working from the inside of an estate wagon may tell you.
Click to expand...

In 1991, i went on a school trip to a science lecture at York University on explosives and luminescence, at one point the lecturer demonstrated a musket, loaded it with a plumbers wax candle and proceeded to fire it at a target, which had several bricks, two breeze blocks and three pieces of wood behind it, it got all the way to the last piece of wood. Forward momentum & sectional density... Powerful stuff.
 
leftysergeant said:
Just to follow up, it seems that genghis has taken note of our comments. I will let someone more familiar with the Aussie dialect comment on his comments. I can't really make out much of what he is saying. Is that because he is babbling or because I don't comprehend what he is saying?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-5LXbLH5_I

If anyone does care to respond directly to him, I would recommend a bit of tact. This may be one very fragile personality.
Click to expand...


I watched it and understood OK what he was saying. While I think personal attacks are tedious and unproductive, if he’s going to complain about it he needs to mind his own manners. I only watched a little bit of his Dylan Avery video because I was put off by the constant repetition of the f-word. If he’s a no-planer I won’t be setting aside time to watch his other videos any time soon.

And I think he’s going a little overboard on the paranoia with the bit about being blocked from JREF.
 
I know its been awhile since I have posted on this forum and have been away from checking up on the twoof movement, but I am glad to see the loons are still loony.

Gravy said:
Either kicked out by the Mrs. or the basement flooded.
Click to expand...

I strongly believe he is living out of car, stealing wireless where ever he can.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom