• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Former Italian President says 911 inside job

Firestone:

"The article in Corriere della Serra is from november 30, so the "exceptional scoop" should have appeared by now."

The exceptional scoop was the Osama audio, and the audio did mention Berlusconi, for the first time.

I need a primer on Italian Politics
 
Last edited:
I guess these folks had no responsibilities

[qimg]http://www.historicaldocuments.com/MarchonWashingtonPhotoAA.jpg[/qimg]

9-11_Protest.jpg
 
[qimg]http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/Profiles/9-11/Multimedia/9-11_Protest.jpg[/qimg]
Hahahaha, great shot of two 9/11 cover-up signs in the middle of a massive anti-war rally.

Man, you're still new to this whole concept of evidence that doesn't need quotation marks around the word, aren't you?
 
Firestone:

"The article in Corriere della Serra is from november 30, so the "exceptional scoop" should have appeared by now."

The exceptional scoop was the Osama audio, and the audio did mention Berlusconi, for the first time.
No, the article in the Corriere della Serra appeared after the release of the audio.
The scoop was supposed to be that the Bin Laden-audio was fabricated in Milan by Berlusconi's cronies.
 
Last edited:
Actually, any of them... along with paperwork, unbiased testimony which supports them, or physical evidence that proves their point. Again, we're skeptics... give us REAL evidence and we'll follow it.

Of course, we've been waiting six years for a shred of it and haven't gotten any yet.

Now back atcha, what would it take for you to be convinced that everything your side spouts is speculative horsecrap with no basis in reality and despite anything else that has made this administration a total bust they didn't blow up the twin towers or allow it to happen?


You didn't answer. If you would be so kind as to do so.
 
No, the article in the Corriere della Serra appeared after the release of the audio.
The scoop was supposed to be that the Bin Laden-audio was fabricated in Milan by Berlusconi's cronies.

While the article may have appeared after the release of the audio, there is no doubt that the ex-pres's comments were made BEFORE the release (in fact I think he called it a video, and he said the Silvio had not contacted his successor, and the report ends noting "In realtà è giunta a Berlusconi la solidarietà per il governo di Vannino Chiti, ministro per i Rapporti con il Parlamento." Which I take to mean that Berlusconi had contacted him and expressed his "solidarity" with the new government).
 
In the words of the commission’s co-chairmen, this is the compelling inside story of how the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States—more commonly known as the 9/11 Commission—managed to succeed against all odds in producing a report that made clear what went wrong and why.

http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780307263773

Not to mention that Hamilton clearly states here that he doesn't believe the American government was behind 9/11:

 
While the article may have appeared after the release of the audio, there is no doubt that the ex-pres's comments were made BEFORE the release (in fact I think he called it a video, and he said the Silvio had not contacted his successor, and the report ends noting "In realtà è giunta a Berlusconi la solidarietà per il governo di Vannino Chiti, ministro per i Rapporti con il Parlamento." Which I take to mean that Berlusconi had contacted him and expressed his "solidarity" with the new government).
Sorry to disagree again.

There is really no doubt that Cossiga is talking about the already released audio (which he indeed calls video), and annouces a coming scoop.
Cossiga explicitly says that Al Jazeera has already broadcasted the message: "...un videomontaggio realizzato negli studi di Mediaset a Milano e fatto giungere alla rete televisiva islamista Al Jazira che lo ha ampiamente diffuso."

The last paragraph of Cossiga's quote is:

"Per questo - conclude Cossiga - nessuna parola di solidarietà è giunta a Silvio Berlusconi, che sarebbe l'ideatore della geniale falsificazione, né dal Quirinale, né da Palazzo Chigi né da esponenti del centrosinistra!"

Meaning: "For this reason [9/11 being an inside job]- concludes Cossiga - no show of solidarity with Berlusconi [who is treathened in the audio by Bin Laden], the maker of this fake audio will come from the president, the prime minister or others from the centre-left".

The Corriere della Serra concludes: "In realtà è giunta a Berlusconi la solidarietà per il governo di Vannino Chiti, ministro per i Rapporti con il Parlamento."

Meaning: "In reality, minister Vannino Chiti, minister for the relations with the parliament, has expressed, in the name of the governement, his solidarity with Berlusconi."
 
Last edited:
Not to mention that Hamilton clearly states here that he doesn't believe the American government was behind 9/11:

A truther providing evidence that directly blows his own point out of the water? Well that has to be a first. :p
 
I agree 100%...The US Gov "was not" behind 9/11.

International Bankers owe no loyalty to any certain country.
And yet an awful lot* of you seem to think they give their loyalty to Israel.




*"awful lot" based on percentage of twoofers who use the term "international bankers." In the real world there aren't an "awful lot" of you.
 
Last edited:
And yet an awful lot* of you seem to think they give their loyalty to Israel.




*"awful lot" based on percentage of twoofers who use the term "international bankers." In the real world there aren't an "awful lot" of you.

I am not one of those. I can't speak for the people who think such a thing as I believe if it suited them (The Bankers) they would wipe any country off the map including Israel.
 
Last edited:
Since when did it become OUR job to provide "evidence"?

All we are trying to say is that the "official" story is a complete hoax and a "real" investigation is needed.

That is the purpose of a "real" investigation and not the whitewash that was carried out before.
Who do you think should investigate 9/11? Some names, if you don't mind...
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom