[Moderated]The Holocaust never happened!

kageki said:
Does that account for the 6 million dead or how those people died that were cremated?
Click to expand...
Between that and the mass graves (as well as the bodies that hadn't been buried yet and had to be disposed of by captured members of the SS), it certainly proves a Holocaust.

Or is your assertion that there was a Holocaust, just with an inflated body count? Would two million have made it any less of a horrifying act, or does actually killing two million people not rank as low as tripling the number for political gain on your morality scale? (Not that they did, but let's play your game for a second.)
 
Drudgewire said:
Between that and the mass graves (as well as the bodies that hadn't been buried yet and had to be disposed of by captured members of the SS), it certainly proves a Holocaust.

Or is your assertion that there was a Holocaust, just with an inflated body count? Would two million have made it any less of a horrifying act, or does actually killing two million people not rank as low as tripling the number for political gain on your morality scale? (Not that they did, but let's play your game for a second.)
Click to expand...

The stupid demagoging is getting old. MaGZ pointed out that the US invaded Iceland in WWII. Do you how someone responded? That the US didn't kill 1/5 of the population as though to diminish this act.

Anyways, I have no intent other then getting the facts correct. Are you saying it's 2 million?
 
kageki said:
Ok then, but apparently I'm not the only one asking: (I cut a link).

Yes Auschwitz was a labor camp.
Click to expand...

And an extermination camp. It was a complex of camps. Best est is that 1.5mln people of all varieties were killed there. So don't try to sneak that one by.

Don't you ever get tired of being so wrong?

And where are your good buddies, all those "Aryans" you dream of hanging out with? (Evidently.)
 
kageki said:
The stupid demagoging is getting old. MaGZ pointed out that the US invaded Iceland in WWII. Do you how someone responded? That the US didn't kill 1/5 of the population as though to diminish this act.

Anyways, I have no intent other then getting the facts correct. Are you saying it's 2 million?
Click to expand...

So now you equate the Iceland case, with the Holocaust? Your comments are beyond belief. I advise you to apply for the $1 mln Randi challenge.

That is to say, I have no idea whether you claim paranormal powers, but the way you are going that could be your next move. I mean, why not?
 
kageki said:
Well you haven't proved that mass gassings are possible with Zyklon B or that the labor camps were extermination camps.
Click to expand...

Nizkor link, Nizkor link, Nizkor link.

It has been proved. You just don't like it.
 
Just thought I'd offer this up:

dem·a·gogue also dem·a·gog (děm'ə-gôg', -gŏg') Pronunciation Key
n.
A leader who obtains power by means of impassioned appeals to the emotions and prejudices of the populace.
A leader of the common people in ancient times.

tr.v. dem·a·gogued also dem·a·goged, dem·a·gogu·ing also dem·a·go·ging, dem·a·gogues also dem·a·gogs
Usage Problem To speak about (an issue, for example) in the manner of a demagogue.


[Greek dēmagōgos, popular leader : dēmos, people; see dā- in Indo-European roots + agōgos, leading (from agein, to lead; see ag- in Indo-European roots).]


Usage Note: Among the nouns that the Usage Panel is loath to see used as a verb is demagogue, meaning "to speak about something in the manner of a demagogue." Ninety-four percent reject it in the sentence The President will demagogue Medicare, unwilling to acknowledge that fundamental reforms need to be made. Resistance to the use of traditional nouns as verbs is sometimes strong, especially when the novel usages are associated with business or bureaucratic jargon.
Click to expand...

Demagogue is a noun. If I'm reading this correctly, it should not be used as a verb. If you're that desperate for a verb, kageki, may I suggest pontificating instead?[/derail]
 
SDC said:
So now you equate the Iceland case, with the Holocaust? Your comments are beyond belief. I advise you to apply for the $1 mln Randi challenge.

That is to say, I have no idea whether you claim paranormal powers, but the way you are going that could be your next move. I mean, why not?
Click to expand...

No. Merely to point out that stating only 2 million died in the Holocaust would not diminish the event.

Are you also defending the US invasion of Iceland?
 
Sabrina said:
Just thought I'd offer this up:



Demagogue is a noun. If I'm reading this correctly, it should not be used as a verb. If you're that desperate for a verb, kageki, may I suggest pontificating instead?[/derail]
Click to expand...

Politicians often say demagoging. You should email Ron Paul and tell him to stop saying that.
 
Terry said:
Do you dispute that hydrogen cyanide is extremely toxic? What is it exactly that make you think mass gassings aren't possible?
Click to expand...

Well Terry if you bother to read the criticism you would see that people that has worked with lethal gas don't believe mass extermination is possible using gas.

Because it's so toxic it would kill anyone around also. The bodies exude the gas. You would need a full body suit to be safe handling the corpses. None of it adds up to the feasibility.

Is this a debunking site or I believe everything that the government says site?
 
SDC said:
Nizkor link, Nizkor link, Nizkor link.

It has been proved. You just don't like it.
Click to expand...

You just don't like that I maybe right.

Please do link to the specific page addressing the use of Zykon B. Please people start actually linking.
 
kageki said:
Is this a debunking site or I believe everything that the government says site?
Click to expand...
Debunk = To eliminate bunk.

If the government is the one spewing bunk, we call them on it. When racists cloaking themselves in historical revisionism spew bunk, they get the same treatment.

Facts are facts, supposition is supposition. Spin is spin. We only concern ourselves with the facts. VERIFIABLE facts. If you could produce any of them that stood up to the indisputable evidence, you'd be taken seriously.

But you haven't, therefore you aren't.
 
Last edited:
kageki said:
Well Terry if you bother to read the criticism you would see that people that has worked with lethal gas don't believe mass extermination is possible using gas.

Because it's so toxic it would kill anyone around also. The bodies exude the gas. You would need a full body suit to be safe handling the corpses. None of it adds up to the feasibility.
Click to expand...

So its not that you don't think its possible, its just that you have some technical issues? Given that prisoners were used to move the corpses, I don't think that the safety of handling them was likely a major concern. And venting the chamber to free air would ensure the concentration of gas quickly diminished below the lethal level.

kageki said:
Is this a debunking site or I believe everything that the government says site?
Click to expand...

neither.
 
kageki said:
You just don't like that I maybe right.

Please do link to the specific page addressing the use of Zykon B. Please people start actually linking.
Click to expand...

Nizkor link, Nizkor link, Nizkor link.

And for heaven's sake, proofread your posts. It's embarrassing enough to have you spewing vile lies without them also being ungrammatical.
 
kageki said:
Politicians often say demagoging. You should email Ron Paul and tell him to stop saying that.
Click to expand...

I don't speak to Ron Paul, nor do I have any interest in doing so. On the other hand, I have been speaking to you, and as I and the majority of the posters on here appreciate proper grammar and word usage, I thought you would appreciate the mild correction and cease using a noun as a verb. Was I wrong?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom