• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Wieck Chickens Out

Greening has apologized to me. I accepted his apology. Wieck, you can go right ahead with your silly ad-hominems. It's all you have.

Greening has also reassured me that he is still willing to have a debate with me.

Ron, Mackey you might want to check out the PhysOrg forum. Greening is slamming the NIST report pretty hard. What's up with that?
 
What, no, he couldnt be...

A SCIENTIST IS CRITICALLY ANALYZING A SCIENTIFIC PAPER CREATED BY OTHER SICENTISTS.....

Well I have never heard....

How dare he...

TAM:)
 
Seems Pomeroo Has a History of Backing out of Debates

Just to be fair, it seems clear that Pomeroo backed out of this Hardfire debate.
 
Steven Lupo Grossi said:
Just to be fair, it seems clear that Pomeroo backed out of this Hardfire debate.
Click to expand...


I can live with that conclusion. If you research the topic carefully (yeah, right), you'll notice that I informed Ace that he was auditioning. No planes, dustified steel, and imaginary beam weapons didn't get the part.
 
Last edited:
Steven Lupo Grossi said:
Just to be fair, it seems clear that Pomeroo backed out of this Hardfire debate.
Click to expand...

I see it as a case of Pomeroo deciding not to use Hardfire as a freak show. A debate between Mark and Ace or Ron and Ace would have looked like someone taunting the mentally ill. Don't get me wrong, I would have watched it, but it would have been a train wreck.
 
pomeroo said:
I can live with that conclusion. If you research the topic carefully (yeah, right), you'll notice that I informed Ace that he was auditioning. No planes, dustified steel, and imaginary beam weapons didn't get the part.
Click to expand...

I also don't think that eyewitnesses being told that they were either duped or are lying for the government when they say they saw a plane crash into the South Tower would go over well with a New York audience. The show would lose credibility for even allowing such an absurd notion to be debated.
 
Slayhamlet said:
I also don't think that eyewitnesses being told that they were either duped or are lying for the government when they say they saw a plane crash into the South Tower would go over well with a New York audience. The show would lose credibility for even allowing such an absurd notion to be debated.
Click to expand...


Exactly. Debating whether or not planes flew into the Towers is idiotic, extremely offensive, and embarrassing for all concerned in any venue. Doing it in NYC is much, much worse.
 
What would Ace have brought to the table? Space beams? Dustification? Pyroclastic flows?
 
It's 'hardfire' not 'easyfire'. I imagine the show has the same policy towards debating the flat earth society and other absurd claims that aren't worth bothering with. And to make a mockery of 9/11 in the city o NYC by bringing up no-planer claims? That's an outright insult.
 
WHY did someone drag this discussion out of the mothballs? I had finally scrubbed the taste of TS1234 off my eyeballs... and now THIS.

Di.... um, ok, must be civil. Male sexual organs. All of you.






:p
 
don't worry about it Ace. Most people who use terms like "clinically insane" have absolutey no idea what they are talking about. Armchair psychologists are idiots. there are a few people on this site who like to pretend that they understand psychology, but they run like a wounded animal when called out by someone who spent years studying the subject.

but anyway...

no planes? I thought that was a joke made up by JREFers.
 
Sadly, it's not. There are really some people out there who believe that the planes were holograms, the explosions were done like movie industry special effects, and the towers were disintigrated by an energy beam from a super secret government satellite.

You can look up any of the numerous threads started here by Truthseeker1234. We wish it were a joke, too.
 
Last edited:
Minadin said:
Sadly, it's not. There are really some people out there who believe that the planes were holograms, the explosions were done like movie industry special effects, and the towers were disintigrated by an energy beam from a super secret government satellite.

You can look up any of the numerous threads started here by Truthseeker1234. We with it were a joke, too.
Click to expand...


Well, I thought that it was a very, very elaborate joke, that Truthseeker was in on.

No planes indeed. The thermite theory is pretty mundane by comparison.
 
Liszt said:
don't worry about it Ace. Most people who use terms like "clinically insane" have absolutey no idea what they are talking about. Armchair psychologists are idiots. there are a few people on this site who like to pretend that they understand psychology, but they run like a wounded animal when called out by someone who spent years studying the subject.

but anyway...

no planes? I thought that was a joke made up by JREFers.
Click to expand...

Which is why you will rarely, in a serious context, see me use the term clinically insane. I may state, off the cuff, that someone is "insane" but as someone who professionally uses psychology as part of his practice, I realize that to seriously label someone as insane requires a full and thorough history and physical.

"No-planes" is a terms used by debunkers and truthers alike. It is reference to those within the truth movement who feel the 9/11 attacks, were CGI'ed in on the TV screen, and that there were no witnesses in real time, to the actual crashes.

TAM:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom