• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 Challenge, Split from: Fetzer wants debate

As to Aqua232, even though he appears to have gotten himself a rest at least, if not permanently... The court system is based on theories and the ability to falsify them, it's just that this is done in real time and via an advocatory process rather than by slowly and laborious work. The Prosecutor puts forward the People or Crown's case against the defendant and then provides the evidence that supports said theory. The Defence Counsel will then attempt to falsify that theory by showing where it breaks down and not true. The Jury's responsibility is to determine if the Defence actually managed to falsify the Prosecutor's theory, or if in the case where he has provided a counter theory, if that theory is reasonable enough to explain the evidence presented in such a way that it may in fact have occurred that way. Really the only way that is ultimately different is that when you do have competing theories neither of which can be falsified by the observational data presented, you don't determine the outcome based on Occam's razor and then attempt to get more data to decide which to accept as likely true.
 
Last edited:
Who is pdoherty, and why does he have so many sockpuppets?
 
Bell said:
Cheers has been banned (was a sock puppet of Aqua323, NBachmann, soundaddicted, Traitorbasher, Jaguar, tonicblue, Aphelion, rebel, Wizard, stundie, Shades_of_Grey, jessicarabbit, Laith, Docker and pdoherty76)
Click to expand...

Wait...Stundie and pdoherty76 were one and the same?
 
nicepants said:
Wait...Stundie and pdoherty76 were one and the same?
Click to expand...



That's unclear. Stundie denies it to this day, but also seems to refuse to provide any evidence to the mods here to suport that denial. Typical CT weirdness, is all.
 
Aqua323 said:
How do juries judge the claims of a witness. They decide how reliable they think the witness is, and they look at the case as a whole and see how the witness statements contradict or support each other.

This is very simple, why are you having trouble with this?
Click to expand...

Apparently, you've never been to court.

Since when is evidence NOT part of a trial ?

Without evidence of any kind, wouldn't you want to be acquitted ?



....darn... banned
 
So this is their assault? The same 3 people with new sockpuppets every day?

:rolleyes:
 
Totovader said:
So this is their assault? The same 3 people with new sockpuppets every day?

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
P Doherty is single handedly trying to resurrect the twoof movement. I'm guessing he still has about 4 socks here. some are parked sorta like hydra teeth in a bowl that become skeletons. and as we all know. skeletons have no life
 

Attachments

  • skeletons1.jpg
    skeletons1.jpg
    101.1 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Horatius said:
That's unclear. Stundie denies it to this day, but also seems to refuse to provide any evidence to the mods here to suport that denial. Typical CT weirdness, is all.
Click to expand...

P D'oh even asked to get Stundie reinstalled. That was about a year ago. But when I went through all the banning posts yesterday, Stundie's banning was still there. So I figure the mods still agree Stundie was in fact P D'oh.
 
Holy Crap

Aqua323 said:
I have answered and proved your challenge is totally baseless.

Thank god I am normal. When I saw the planes hit the towers on 911 I thought what a terrible CRIME, lets catch the people who did it. I didn't think "ooh look, an interesting scientific phenomenon, lets see if I can produce a falsifiable theory".

If you can't see this then I can't help you.
Click to expand...

On why the truth about 9-11 can't be determined by science. I thinks we got a stundie nomination here.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom