(Ed) Fetzer claims JREF Forum Members afraid to debate him

[Gravy]

It appears Gravy has debated him and the members here couldn't wait to see it, so it looks like people do care.

No, that's the point. Fetzer brought absolutely nothing to the table but his illness. Why that needs more of a platform, I have no idea. Any offer Ron made to him is between them. No one is obligated to spend time with this loon, who has nothing new to offer.

 

[Pardalis]

You have another chance to own him, and this time you don't have to pay anything.

Overkill, at this point it would be like watching porn.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Watch the debate with Gravy, pay attention to his "debate style", that's why it's pointless to debate him.

It's worth noting that the "debate" in question would be, iirc, a written disputation; which would put the kibosh on some of his antics.

 

[Skibum]

That doesn't sound like a group of people who isn't interested in what he has to say.

It's not a matter of being interested in what he has to say, it's a matter of revealing him as the loon he is to anyone who watches the video. Been done. Why continue to beat a dead horse.

 

[Gravy]

It's worth noting that the "debate" in question would be, iirc, a written disputation; which would put the kibosh on some of his antics.

It would be a much greater waste of time, IMO, and would only encourage his attention-seeking behavior.

 

[Sparky]

You have another chance to own him, and this time you don't have to pay anything.

I'm curious. It certainly appears you're shilling for Fetzer here. Any particular reason why?

 

[Aqua323]

Odd. You are happy to debate any anonymous loon that joins up here, but not Fetzer who is one of the truth movement "leaders".

I am beginning to think Fetzer is right.....

 

[Aqua323]

I'm curious. It certainly appears you're shilling for Fetzer here. Any particular reason why?

Did you not see me call him a loon earlier?

I'm just letting you all know what he has been saying on the radio about you.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Odd. You are happy to debate any anonymous loon that joins up here, but not Fetzer who is one of the truth movement "leaders".

I am beginning to think Fetzer is right.....

You're either lying about just "beginning" to believe Fetzer or you failed to read and comprehend post #5 of this thread.

 

[Gravy]

Odd. You are happy to debate any anonymous loon that joins up here, but not Fetzer who is one of the truth movement "leaders".

I am beginning to think Fetzer is right.....

You're a genius, aren't you? Perhaps you should read the posts in this thread. Perhaps you can tell us what new information Fetzer has that flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon: he can't.

I await your reply, showing that you understand the responses here. Are you capable of that? I'm betting not.

 

[rwguinn]

Odd. You are happy to debate any anonymous loon that joins up here, but not Fetzer who is one of the truth movement "leaders".

I am beginning to think Fetzer is right.....

If you are "beginning to think", with a period after the "think", that puts you one-up of Fetzer, wo is incapable of thinking...

Otherwise, you are verturing into Ad Hom land...

 

[Sparky]

I am beginning to think Fetzer is right.....

We already know what you "think"....

 

[DGM]

Did you not see me call him a loon earlier?

I'm just letting you all know what he has been saying on the radio about you.

Let him come here. I don't believe any of us want to give him the attention he craves. Can't you understand that?

 

[Gravy]

Remember that Fetzer has no other job. He's a full-time loon with a book to sell.

 

[1337m4n]

Ooh! Ooh! I'll debate him!

...provided, of course, that I don't have to travel anywhere. Have him come to UCF.

 

[Aqua323]

Remember that Fetzer has no other job. He's a full-time loon with a book to sell.

He doesn't need a job, he is retired.

 

[Skibum]

Odd. You are happy to debate any anonymous loon that joins up here, but not Fetzer who is one of the truth movement "leaders".

I am beginning to think Fetzer is right.....

Isn't Felcher one of the "leaders" that is being marginalized by much of his own movement?

If his own movement doesn't want anything to do with him, why should we?

 

[T.A.M.]

Aqua:

For someone who thinks the guy is a loon and is JUST PASSING ON THE MESSAGE, you seem to be highly interested, and seem to be pushing the matter.

Fetzer could easily join here and debate, he has chosen not to. Unless you are his official spokesperson, I care not as to why you speculate he has not done so.

As well, the tone of your posts is confrontational, mean spirited, and antagonistic. Very strange for someone who has only been here for a few days...just a passing comment.

Beyond all of that, why would any of us here want to debate him? One of our best debunkers has already handed his ass to him, what would be the point?

TAM

 

[Totovader]

Odd. You are happy to debate any anonymous loon that joins up here, but not Fetzer who is one of the truth movement "leaders".

I am beginning to think Fetzer is right.....

He's already been debated, and he's already been debunked.

At this point his only option is to claim a rematch- but I personally see no reason why he deserves to waste anyone's time any more. He had his airfare paid for, he refused to answer the questions, and did his usual dodging.

He would just do the same thing again. There's no point in entertaining that.

 

[uruk]

Odd. You are happy to debate any anonymous loon that joins up here, but not Fetzer who is one of the truth movement "leaders".

I am beginning to think Fetzer is right.....

Fetzer's particular brand of hokum has already been shown for what it really is. Why do you feel a need to see it done it again? Morbid curiosity? Sadisim?

It pretty much a case of "been there, done that".

Isn't there also a saying about chewing your Fetzers twice?

You could always e-mail him and ask him to join up here. I'm sure he'll enjoy being the village bicycle.