November 2007 Stundie Nominations

Mobyseven

Philosopher
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
5,671
Howdy, y'all!

No time for witty banter this month, it's exam time! Read the rules and post the noms, and don't cry for me!
  1. Nominations from the JREF forums are allowing, but will not be as highly regarded as nominations from other sources, be they on or off the interwebs. The finalists will contain a maximum of 25% nominations from the JREF forums; 75-100% must be from nominations external to the JREF forums.
  2. Nominations should always be accompanied by a link or a screenshot, to confirm that the quote exists and has not been taken out of context. (It would be wise to always have a backup screenshot, as truth movement forums are well known for deleting entire threads.)
  3. For a nomination to be eligible, it must have a real and obvious link to conspiracy theories, but not exclusively 9/11 conspiracy theories.
  4. Stundie nominations should 'stand alone'. Do not over-embellish introductions, but do provide comments. Do not use any blatant ad hominem attacks.
  5. Please post the nomination under the real screenname of the nominee, and not under a slightly altered name (e.g. Killclown, Roxpup, Do-over).
  6. The best Stundie nominations are short and sweet. As a guideline, no more than 6 lines should be included from the post. If you are giving context, highlight the actual nomination.
  7. Entire videos or audio clips are not eligible for nomination. Specific statements or claims from videos or audio clips are eligible for nomination.
  8. No long rants. Cut them down to the funniest bit.
  9. No speeling mistikes or tie-pose. Everybody makes a mistake once in a while!
Questions? Ask! Bribes? PM me and we'll sort something out!


Mobyseven

Democratically Elected Tyrant
 
First in. This beautiful example of Troofer arifmatic from LCF's -Raven- regarding the "Don't tase me, bro!" dude.

Anyways, the dude was probably given 2 options;

-option A: felony for resisting arrest w/ violence
or
-option B: 18 months probation w/ no record after succesfully completing the probation,
but he probably was never told about
-option C: go to the media and civil liberty organisations and expose the event and sue the pants off the police and the university for excessive use of force and civil liberty violations.

I would have went with option C personally.
 
Wait, someone got tasered? *scratches head* I don't remember reading or watching anything about that.

[/sarcasm]
 
"I watched Larry Silverstein use the actual words "Bldg. 7 was a controlled demolition for safety reasons" on a History Channel show called History's Business in late 2002, so I absolutely know I am right about that and none of yours or Popular mechanics non-engineering editors can say different" -realccdeal

This was priceless. Sorry I don't have the link for it, but I know everyone here has read this quote and I am sure someone can link it for me (:
 
Canuck NWO mess up big time

WetBlanket said:
Oddly enough the building did not collapse


from THIS THREAD (4 posts down) at Pilots For Truth about the rather small plane (Piper Seneca) that did this to a rather large concrete multi-storey building in Richmond B C recently:-

87484729577f4b210.jpg


by the way there apparently was no fire post impact and that poor lady in the pic above was waiting to be rescued.....

BV
 
These two go together. This is in response to a inquiry into why they claim 9/11 is an inside job, while not having read a certain report.

If I wrote a paper proving the earth was flat would you approach it with an open mind or declare it wrong first?

Exactly... I do not need to read a paper which claims the earth is flat to know it is wrong.
 
From the "Were the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings an act of terrorism" thread comes this gem:

It was a war crime, mass murder and a real holocaust, like Dresden and Hamberg and dozens of other German cities. Not like the fake jewish holohoax.

Oh, I forgot. It was proven at Nuremberg that the Nazis killed 20,000 jews with an atom bomb, so I guess that counts as a jewish holocaust.

:jaw-dropp
 
Poster Cole Trickle on the Blackvault's "Government and Political Conspiracies" subforum illustrates the idiocy that passes for logic in many a "truther" as well as a barely comprehensible writing style..

http://www.theblackvault.com/ftopic-66002-days0-orderasc-15.html


What evidence of c-4 in Building 7~lol~~~that ploy is old my friend. EVIDENCE~ so over rated it's ridiculous, but obviously only to the " SANE " Enough visual evidence to choke to death on.

Here's one~~~~~it's was really Harry Potter waving his wand that brought it down.

Thermite was everywhere ~~Evidence~NASA Photos of HOTTER THAN HELL~ Pools of molten steel glowing/burinng a month after the event~~~~This was probably Hippies Conspiracy theorists having a love in~~~~~the pics were actually glowing bongs, and embers from burning trash barrel fires used for warmth.

The powder substance, residue of pulverized concrete~~~~~just a figment ( by now anyway ) of imagination IN the MINDS OF the" INSANE "

Actually it was a result of the energy released by a gravitational collapse of a 1300' tall structure. This produced enough said energy to melt steel~ba wa lol Turning it to "steel dust"

The true evidence is that the OFFICIAL ACCOUNT is more full of holes that either Bonnie or Clyde~ any no one with half a brain can refute this in an intelligent manner. NO ONE.

Cole

and

Evidence was swept away by the Minions~ Why do you think it's all they can ask about~~~~~WHERE's the EVIDENCE~~WHERE's the EVIDENCE~ Tired, old, and ridiculous.
 

Back
Top Bottom