• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bigfoot - The Patterson-Gimlin Film

Status
Not open for further replies.
mangler wrote:
Sweaty,

Do you have any idea how many different styles of dogear helmets were made? (I didn't think so)
Click to expand...

You're right, mangler...I don't know how many styles they make.

If there is a style of helmet which could plausibly have been used in the PG film......why don't you post an image of it, and show that it could actually fit inside Patty's head?



After very little thought I’m inclined to believe that you cannot say modify.
Click to expand...


After very little thought...you posted this image...

Helmets3lined.jpg


Can you re-size the helmet so that's it the correct size....or is that too much for you to handle? :D
 
Diogenes said:
Will you post actual evidence that a creature such as the one seen in the film actually exists ?

Let me guess.. That would be way too much for you to handle ....
Click to expand...


Greg.......it's up to everybody....including myself...to post something of substance...in an effort to help arrive at the truth of the matter concerning Bigfoot.

Simply posting one's opinion, or "make-believe" analysis...such as mangler's helmet post....is not posting anything of value.

You're entitled to your own opinion on whatever I post....but if you disagree with any of it, feel free to post a counter-argument.....containing something of SUBSTSANCE.

Your last post is 100% pure garbage. :)
 
Hey Sweaty, here's another with BH's face slapped in there. I crack myself up sometimes.


m :bike:

 
This started out as a joke, but the resemblance in facial structure is spookey.


m



 
LTC8K6 said:
Like an animation of two unrelated frames of the PGF?
Click to expand...

Just trying to get my count up so I can post pix..

I assume you're referring to the finger animation. How come you think frames 61 and 72 are unrelated? They're only about 3/4 sec apart (1 step). If they were successive frames the apparent finger motion would have to happen in less than 1/16 sec. If this were the case, it would be even easier to dismiss.
 
LTC8K6 wrote:
Like an animation of two unrelated frames of the PGF?
Click to expand...


Óðinn said:
Just trying to get my count up so I can post pix..

I assume you're referring to the finger animation. How come you think frames 61 and 72 are unrelated? They're only about 3/4 sec apart (1 step). If they were successive frames the apparent finger motion would have to happen in less than 1/16 sec. If this were the case, it would be even easier to dismiss.
Click to expand...


Nice response, Ooinn! :)

Those 2 frames are indeed related....being less than a second apart. The skeptics here have done everything with that 2-frame finger-bending animated clip except admit that it shows that Patty's fingers actually moved.

It shows the extent of stupidity they will happily go to to dance around something which smacks of real Bigfoot.

"If the fingers bend...you MUST pretend". ;)
 
mangler said:
How about this one Sweaty, better?


m :bike:

[URL]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_82644728e33e6e4a9.jpg[/URL]

[URL]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_82644728e5c870461.jpg[/URL]
Click to expand...


No...it's not better, mangler.

The helmet is too large....and it goes up too high on the head. The top couple of inches of Patty's head is much too pointed for there to be a human head/helmet inside (those 2 inches or so).
Other than those little details....it's lovely! :)
 
Last edited:
AtomicMysteryMonster said:
INow that I think about it, this kinda reminds me of the "Snow walker" video incident. I've seen some apologists argue that Dr. Meldrum was pressured into giving an on-the-spot quote on the footage. You'd think that a scientist would've said that he'd need more time to properly analyze the footage before making any conclusions...
Click to expand...

Snowshoe feet were used, which gave a height estimate of 9'. Why is it skeptics fail to mention Dr. Meldrum exposed the hoax?

I e-mailed Jeff about the picture tube posted years ago. It was supposed to have been with a still from Redwoods, but someone changed it.
 
SweatyYeti said:
LTC8K6 wrote:






Nice response, Ooinn! :)

Those 2 frames are indeed related....being less than a second apart. The skeptics here have done everything with that 2-frame finger-bending animated clip except admit that it shows that Patty's fingers actually moved.

It shows the extent of stupidity they will happily go to to dance around something which smacks of real Bigfoot.

"If the fingers bend...you MUST pretend". ;)
Click to expand...

I love those 2 frames because they clearly show the band that holds the sleeve onto the glove.
 
How come you think frames 61 and 72 are unrelated?
Click to expand...

The claimed relationship is that they show different hand and/or finger positions.

Because there is so little detail available that to say they show fingers bending is a mighty stretch, and because there are 11 frames in between.

In general, are the two frames related? Yes. But the claim is more specific.
 
LTC8K6 said:
The claimed relationship is that they show different hand and/or finger positions.

Because there is so little detail available that to say they show fingers bending is a mighty stretch, and because there are 11 frames in between.

In general, are the two frames related? Yes. But the claim is more specific.
Click to expand...

......And the fingers are bent in both frames but the hand turns on the wrist giving different views of the fingers, the second view showing the bent fingers more clearly than the first. There is an example a few pages back that clearly shows what is going on with the hand and fingers.
 
SweatyYeti said:
..................

It shows the extent of stupidity they will happily go to to dance around something which smacks of real Bigfoot.
.....................
Click to expand...
Please explain how moving fingers are evidence of anything besides moving fingers .....

Where's Patty, sweaty ? Where are her children, husband and friends ?

Why did Patterson stop looking for her, after he managed to film her ?

Here are those amazing bending fingers again .. Some, urrh, one of us can't seem to figure it out ..

DollHand.gif


61_72.gif
 
Last edited:
How the heck do you get two completely different looking feet inside of 1 second anyway? One is a vague block without a sign of individual toes, the other is a well defined humanlike foot with clearly visible individual toes. Where'd the resolution come from?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom