Not to try to blast everyone in the comic section, let me go ahead and give
you the facts as I see them. Read the book below, as it turned out to
appear. And, I know this will be unbelievable to the believers and
halarious to you others, but, let it be known you heard it from me. You
have my name in the profile if you want to contact me. And, I will try to
"copy and paste" this everywhere I can so I will at least have the credit
for my great discoveies and insights. I'm sorry if I "knock-in-the-head",
all the planned, expensive.......that I never went on......expeditiions that
are planned. I'm sure a lot of folks are going to be disappointed, when
they start checking some of the evidence I'm now giving, even if it seems
farfetched..
What you see, in the films and photos are the real thing.......just that
nobody wants to know it/believe it and would rather "throw stones", and I
don't know if you want this information either. If you would rather keep
believing the "Mystic" and all the experts thinking, then you shouldn't read
any further. I may start you onto something that will scare the "S___" out
of you.
Bigfoot, as I can determine, is of the "Alein " species. The head has most
of the features of a pig.......I've coined the name "PIGI" for this "being" , go ahead and take your snicker,and may refer to it this way below. The snout is a shortened version of a trunk and its overall appearance is definitely grotesque. Probably the
reason for the "costume" , I'll mention below, as seeing it's face and body
may scare the "S___" out of you. The hand and feet, as we know them, are
still that of a pig. The hand has the four parts of a pigs foot, but
flexible and adapted for use as a hand, only four fingers (and can be seen
in the Patterson film if you want to check). The feet are, of course cloven
and still make this track, the cloven step with the following two
indentations, as on the pig's foot when they hit the ground. And, I'm sure
you've seen pig's feet at your local Supermarket, if not go check this in
the meat counter, under "Pigs Feet"! LOL! Folks, having some farm
experience already know this and can visualize what I'm saying...I think in
one of the articles I read, someone had tracked one to a pond where all he
could see there were cow's tracks....of course, these tracks would fit right
in and were probably as big as the cow's. It was also menntioned that they were studying the foot pad forward on the tracks.........this is made by the "fake" footpads and the angle of the leg and the cloven hoof. In one of the photos, of the man looking at a few casts on a table, you should notice that a couple of them have what appears to be arch and ankle straps. And, if you look closely at all of them, you will see the evidence of the cloven hoof and a few comical ones where they have made their image.....this will also be noted below.
And, again, let it be known that you heard it from me, the footprints being found are being said to not be able to be recognized, because you're looking for a human type track and not that of a cloven footed animal/PIGI. Go back and look at all the photos of
tracks, especially the ones gathered from the snow, and why they can't be
identified and see tracks like that of a pig or cow. You will see the
beginning edge as two sharp indentations, followed by the two pointed
indentations. This is the type of foot that can make the deep imprints
everyone is talking about The footprints that can't be recognized, of the
ones in the tire tracks, in the middle of the road, are not footprints, but
indentations of the juvenile PIGI lying in the sand.. It was discused in one article I read that they couldn't understand the foot forward appearance of the tracks......a leg and foot of the type I'm talking about would make this on the fake footpads.
My fossil footprint, where I got my first look, telling me they've been
around from "time beginning", as I originally noted, is that of an adult
and juvenile, as I interpret it.
Their limbs are actually quite small in diameter as I'll now discuss. And,
I think the folks that believe they can disappear, are on the right track.
I think their "Ride" and themselves, can "cloak" themselves and also, that
they may have the "cremelion",sp, capability....guess this is cloaking.
They're there, but you don't see them or they disappear before your eyes. I haven't heard anyone say they knew where they went. I, also, have some photos of their images, taken more recently, at another location, that give me this thought.
An aside: I, think the photo of the "Yeti" footprint in the snow, that I
mentioned sold for 3,5oo pounds, is actually a hand print. The "Hand",
would still have the joint a the joint where the hoof bends and provides
their version of the heel of the palm. This could have made such a clear
print, with the palm and two fingers. I can't see where the toe of a cloven
hoof slid under the snow in this photo. The actual footprint in this photo,
though, as I believe are the two indendations at the upper boarder, of the
splayed track of a cloven hoof, as that of the "Buck" deer.......hunter's
know this track.......they may have a more valuable print than they
think.
Now, in the "Jacob's" photos, I believe, where you view the three
photos.........the first is of the two bear cubs, OK, and the other two are
of the PIGI. The second photo is of the PIGI bending over and the third,
where it's sitting down.......the first one, and you'll have to look at the
original, and not the cropped, you'll see an infant, all snuggled in a fur
lined cradle in the lower edge of the photo.......everyone missed this, I'm
sure, as they are critiquing the one animal, and this is where you should
start realizing it isn't an animal, in the general sense. The second photo
shows it nursing one baby, while the second baby, is still comfortably
snuggled in its cradle. I can also see, in the photo of it bending down,
that there is an opening in the "costume", that I still think they are
wearing, under the left armpit. Although, where it is nursing and has an
outstretched arm, I didn't try to look for this feature.
I'm afraid it's "YOUR" photos that is letting me find out all this
information, and I kinda' am getting used to seeing the little things that
are in them. Thank you all for having had them published. I hope your
monetary awards are great.
Now, for seeing their identity as not being the burly beings discussed by
everyone, I have found, from the "Patterson" still frame, being shown on
these sites, that there are emblems, of some sort, on the back and legs.
While looking at this, I can see some sort of apparatus under the fur giving
the large appearance. This is one of the places I saw what I thought could
be a weapon, strapped to its back and later in its hands. Analysing the
emblems, you guess where they came from. The outfit, I noticed has a belt
and there are two seams along the right shoulder. The outfit stops just
below the knee area and there is an apparatus connected to its leg and going
to the foot, and I'm surmising there is a human type footpad attached. I
think this is where the "footprints" are made that the plaster casts have
come from, as presented in other photos. In another of these photos, where
the man is looking at one of his casts, and there are several on the table,
you'll see on a couple of the casts what appears to be straps, surely
overlooked because the footpad is of the only interest. In an additional
photo entry, of what is supposed to be the "buttocks", with the reaching arm
and hand........I think, is really where a decapitated PIGI fell. What I'm
seeing in this photo....the right arm reaching, the chest imprint and in the
right corner is the face/head. This will be your first view of the "Alein"
appearance.....and this interpretation came from me The other folks, with
the big foot casts, may have one of the PIGI'S fakes. You'll have to
understand here, that all this is my interpretation of the photos that I
looked at and you can take it for what it's worth, so to speak.
I've watched the film of the "Yeti", and feel this is where a great
opportunity to make contact with one of the PIGI'S was lost. If you'll
notice in one frame, as it starts to go out of sight, that it stops, looks
toward the photographer, and lifts its left arm and hand, in a "Goodbye"
attidude. Really don't know how the photographer could have responded to
this, though! Upon analysing this film, the fur outfit is also
recognized........there is a definite space below the knee and the same at
the arm......where there is a "gauntlet" as I would call it, from the elbow
area to the hand. Also, this one has something in its "hands", but can't
make it out completely, but has the shape of the crossbow. This was the
same in the "Patterson" film.
And, the other "Yeti" photo, of the one on the snow top mountain, can also
be seen as the PIGI. I discovered the way to determine all this while
viewing my fossils.
Now, I will drop the big one, since it goes along with the above, and since
folks will be trying my discovery technique, for which - now, I won't be
getting my millions, and you will hear of all the new discoveries they will
be able to make and take the credit for. I'll try to post the same
information on various sites, and maybe someone will recognize they heard
something like this somewhere, LOL!!.
1. All the statues on "Easter Island" were made by the PIGI. The statues
that are being "righted" on new bases, are not how they were intended to
look. All the stones, that were strewn around and probably gone now,
created this special scene, and will, now, have destroyed the signivicance
of this particular scene. Their lying position created a scene when viewed
from above, that I can interpret, from one of the original photos, that
were taken in an aerial view. All the folks over there on the expensive
expeditions, and you can see here that I'm just jealous about it, are
"looking for answers in all the wrong places". Guess I may be sorry later
for saying this. Just don't sue me. LOL!!
2. I think the pyramids were built by the PIGI, as I don't think any human
type would have had the intelligence to accomplish this feat, with all the
tunnels and shafts, etc. This is the creation of super intelligence. To
add something for you to think about...... why are all the stonework looking
so random? I've used photos, I've found on the site, that were taken by
others, and can see the images of the PIGI. They are such great thinkers,
that they can lay these stones at various angles, for the whole pyramid, and
that you can take one stone and see an image, then take a small group, see
a different image, and so on for the whole side, where you'll see another
image. And, you can start rotating each of these images, 90 left and get
another image for each for the whole 360. Who or what can create something
with this complexity.???? On the side facing the Spynx, it looks like
something crawling to the top. I think, by removing the outer coating, as we
are told was done, that this opens up the "Art" that is found there. I
will never know if I should have told all this!!!!!!!
3. I think all the structures in South America, were built by them....PIGI
appearance is here, also!
4. I think that the Spynx once had a short snout instead of a
nose.......PIGI images abound here and the work they are doing here will
never be what the original looked like. I examined an original photo and
can readilly interpret how it once looked.
5. The stones of "Stonehenge" have PIGI images as part of the appearance.
The one they call the "Base Stone", is the image of a lion.
6. Upon examining "Ayer's Rock" in Austrailia, from the great photos that
can be found of it, there are indentations, which they have named, but are
the shape of the PIGI. You can see why I need an expert to follow my
assertions.
7. And, here's the one that will make disbelievers of you all, of all the
things I've said above......enhancing sections of the "Moon" and "Mars",
show images of the PIGI. In other words, they don't have to fly to "Mars"
to see if there was ever life there.......there may still be, LOL!!
And as for the flying saucers.......I was taking pictures of the Sunrise, a
couple Saturdays ago, when I thought this one little, dark ring-of-a-cloud
was moving faster than the others. I started clicking it, and have about
ten photos, and recorded its movement for a couple minutes and found it
definitely progressing faster, as referenced by the other objects in the
photos, poles, etc.! And, I don't know what to make of it......you can now
think what you want.
I welcome some archeologist's, paleontoligist's and anthropoligist's input,
if there be some listening. And now, how is it said, "Thank You and
Goodnight"..........(hope you overlooked my spelling)
