Fascist America, in 10 easy steps

Neither do hawks for that matter.

HawkRedShoulderedHead03.jpg
 
JEROME DA GNOME said:
Also, Chickenhawks do not have teeth.

[qimg]http://www.petcaretips.net/foghorn_henery.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...


There's actually no such thing as a chickenhawk:

In the US, "Chickenhawk or Chicken Hawk" is an unofficial designation for three species of North American hawks -- the Cooper's Hawk, the Sharp-shinned Hawk and the Red-tailed Hawk. The term Chicken Hawk, however, is inappropriate. Although Cooper's and Sharp-shinned Hawks may attack other birds, chickens do not make up a significant part of their diet; Red-tailed Hawks have varied diets, though they too would be unlikely to attack poultry.

Historically, misinterpretation of the name "Chicken Hawk" has labelled these birds as pests, hence justifying their slaughter. Officially, per the American Ornithologists' Union's list of bird names, the term has become obsolete as applied to birds, but still enjoys widespread colloquial use in many rural areas of where any of the three species has been seen as a threat to small outdoor animals kept as pets or livestock, especially chickens.

While the term is still widely used by those who keep such animals, it is too ambiguous to be of any scholarly usefulness, especially since the meaning of hawk differs between America and Europe; thus, the term's propriety (or lack thereof) depends entirely upon context.
Click to expand...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chickenhawk_(bird)
 
Here's Mrs. Wolf's own explanation ...

Talk by Naomi Wolf - The End of America

 
jsfisher said:
Look at the timestamps for posts 206 and 207. A mere twenty minutes is nothing.
...
Click to expand...
I looked at these posts.

You don't complain to the moderators about the editing within the timeframe allowed by moderators because:

your objective is not to be right, your objective here is to troll only.
jsfisher said:
...
Sure beats backpedaling.
Click to expand...
What beats backpedaling though is that in addition to you not knowing your native language (see the meaning of innocence, integrity, honesty which escape you, see pot calling kettle back regarding grammatical errors), in addition to being a scientifically illiterate right-winger, you:

troll.
jsfisher said:
Long after.
Click to expand...
Complain to the administrators that I edit within the time frame allowed.

You won't complain though, because:

you troll here.
 
Last edited:
See Pardalis -who never substantiated in this assertion made on Sunday October 28:
Pardalis said:
Thanks Skeptigirl for abandoning this thread to the loon.
...
Click to expand...
his name-calling of "...loon...", neither his evidence for it- how he pulled a troll disappearing act from the thread (instead of evidence).

See also little Pardalis wishing to ally himself with skeptigirl to single out and attack "...the loon..." after he singled out and attacked skeptigirl two weeks earlier, sign of hypocrisy.
I posted earlier Pardalis two posts contradicting each other, sign of his double face.


Now, little Pardalis retreated in his Montreal swamp, lurking here, waiting for the next opportunity to troll again.
 
Last edited:
JEROME DA GNOME said:
I know not the facts of this circumstance.

It is squirmy if the edit was done after others responded.
Click to expand...
What I edited is the form, not the content.

English is not my native tongue, I post quickly under time pressure, and when I have more time I revisit my writing and change the form but not the meaning within the time frame allowed.

Even when English is a foreign language to me, I still master English better than the U.S. President Bush, though.

Better than jsfisher's English too, a poor native speaker.

If you have a problem with the time frame allowed for editing posts in this forum, contact the administrators.

They allow editing within a time frame, exactly for purposes like mine.
JEROME DA GNOME said:
Also, Chickenhawks do not have teeth.

[qimg]http://www.petcaretips.net/foghorn_henery.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...
Chickenhawks do have teeth, and I am the dentist who pulls them out.
 
Last edited:
JEROME DA GNOME said:
Do you think she is correct in her consideration?

I will bet less than 2 view the talk.
Click to expand...


Quite frankly - I don't think she's correct since Hitler was
more drastic than the whiny Bushies. But I understand that
people draw similarities here.

And from what I've learned about the broad education in
the US about the World outside their own borders and
concerning politics, I wouldn't wonder if America would
turn into a Dictatorship and not enough people would notice
it to prevent this happening.

The Patriot Act was a perfect example of that. Theoretically
the Act could have disabled congress and those Idiots would
have voted for it anyway without reading it... :boggled::rolleyes:
 
JEROME DA GNOME said:
Do you think she is correct in her consideration?



I will bet less than 2 view the talk.
Click to expand...


I viewed it. I didn't find her convincing; too much confirmation bias.

I wonder what dictators before Mussolini did to gain control? For that matter, how many of the 10 evil things did the US have under Roosevelt during WWII?
 
jsfisher said:
I viewed it. I didn't find her convincing; too much confirmation bias.

I wonder what dictators before Mussolini did to gain control? For that matter, how many of the 10 evil things did the US have under Roosevelt during WWII?
Click to expand...

She is showing how democracies advance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom