• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bigfoot - The Patterson-Gimlin Film

Status
Not open for further replies.
TjW said:
I've read the thread, thanks. I'm a poster asking you a polite question.
Now, here

you say you made an audible identification. If this is the truth, then at some point you must have had a visual identification of a bigfoot making the same sounds. Without this correlation between an otherwise identified creature and the sound, you can't make an audible identification.

I notice here

you sidestep a very similar question. That is to say, you don't answer it.

So when was your visual and audible episode with a bigfoot?
Click to expand...

Your posts are nonsense.
 
RayG said:
How does that make bigfoot real?



There, I fixed it for you.



Yes, yes, it couldn't possibly be bear, deer, or elk, it HAD to be bigfoot because you got chased (though you saw no pursuer), because no other animal you were aware of behaved like that (though you saw no animal), and your friend believed it was bigfoot (though he saw no bigfoot).



Do you have fixation issues? Why are you so convinced bigfoot was the culprit?



I assume you mean pursued. How does one chase something without pursuring it?

It sounds like you found an indistinct imprint in the ground, claim it was caused by bigfoot, then use wild imagination to support your case.

How big were these trees? I don't call something a tree unless it's large enough for me to climb, and it will support my weight. Were these trees overturned before you arrived on site, and you just didn't realize it, or did you actually witness the trees being uprooted/broken?



In other words, there was no positive identification, so your imagination filled in the blanks.



How does one separate sense from nonsense?



Yet you're adamant in your belief that you had a bigfoot encounter. I too had an encounter that some have attributed to bigfoot, but I remain unconvinced that what happened to me that night was a sneaky bigfoot.

Sounds like you're convinced it was bigfoot and nothing will sway you from that belief.



And what part of 'you never confirmed what was chasing you' don't you get?

Well that settles it then, for we know how infallible your memory is.

Yes, and even though you didn't actually see anything, you're convinced it was bigfoot.

No, nor should you.



It's whether or not you got chased by bigfoot that's important.

RayG
Click to expand...

Do you consider yourself insightful or something?

You're not.
 
Never Tire of Pedants

Try to keep the questions non-caustic. You really just make yourselves seem rather pedantic.
 
AtomicMysteryMonster said:
Here's an interesting article about both Paul Freeman and the P/G footage. It notes how Roger Patterson made a lot of money off it and gives the alleged reason why he screwed Bob Gimlin out of his share of the profits.
Click to expand...


Yes, Gimlin sold all his rights to the film worth thousands and thousands of dollars to Dahinden for TEN BUCKS! Maybe Dahinden found something that could have indicted Gimlin in a hoax (like his friend and neighbor Heironimus) and this was Gimlins way of washing his hands of it??
 
I Have a Weak Spot for Presumptious Fools

I repair traffic signals here in Honolulu. Regularly, at work, we get phone calls from self declared smart people (I'm a doctor!, I'm a lawyer, I know the Mayor!) who can't figure out how to push a button to cross the street.
Editorials, special features, etc. all trying to seem smart about traffic signal operation. Sometimes I start to feel like a zoo manager, but then I turn compassionate.

(Honolulu Star Bulletin Oct. 15, 2007, At Work (section))
starbulletin.com Oct. 15 issue has my picture at work, I'm the Hawaiian, you can figure it out.
 
Encounter Woo if You Please

William Parcher said:
MOTS is our new Bigfoot troll.
Click to expand...

Actually, LTC is the only person who's asked pertinent questions.
CN: MOTS is dreaming
NW (KK): MOTS is loony
WP (The infant): blah, blah, har har
Mange: I know the area (we'll see)
AMM: ?
TJW: (see WP)
Drewbot (a ray wannabe): MOTS is a liar
Ray (Dark Shadow): 'Depends what the definition of 'is' is.

and over and over
 
Last edited:
manofthesea said:
Disingenuous. Did I state that I made an audio and visual confirmation?
Or are you just spouting nonsense?
Click to expand...
You cannot confirm a single data point with that same data point. Even hearing an identical sound without identifying the source in some other way does not provide confirmation. It would provide replication of that sound, but not confirmation as to the source.

And no, it's not me spouting nonsense.
 
manofthesea said:
A bunch of jibberish. You're LYING. My father's nickname was Buddy.
I really don't appreciate the LIES about my father.
Click to expand...
?? Actually, I made an error there that I didn't catch. I meant to say 'buddy's dad' instead of 'buddy's uncle', meaning your friend's Dad. Doesn't take too much thinking to figure that out, though. But don't let that stop a good dodge.
 
I'm gonna go ahead and say that it's obviously futile to get MOTS to engage in any coherent exchange or to clarify any points of his anecdotes. As I said before, he simply can't. Basic questions only result in goofy one-liners and side-steps.
 
How Thick Are You?

TjW said:
You cannot confirm a single data point with that same data point. Even hearing an identical sound without identifying the source in some other way does not provide confirmation. It would provide replication of that sound, but not confirmation as to the source.

And no, it's not me spouting nonsense.
Click to expand...

If there was any single confirmed sighting, do you think we would be discussing this?

You guys bleev that I'm lying. So, you tell me, what has you so captivated with somebody's encounter that you believe is bs?
 
I Don't Do Links

kitakaze said:
I'm gonna go ahead and say that it's obviously futile to get MOTS to engage in any coherent exchange or to clarify any points of his anecdotes. As I said before, he simply can't. Basic questions only result in goofy one-liners and side-steps.
Click to expand...

I stated my encounter(s). I'll answer pertinent questions with the simplest answer possible.

I am not a bigfoot researcher. I have no links for you to pass the time with. Just my two encounters. The facts have been stated. I don't engage in pedanticism.

ETA: bakatare
 
Last edited:
Please Do

kitakaze said:
I'm gonna go ahead and say that it's obviously futile to get MOTS to engage in any coherent exchange or to clarify any points of his anecdotes. As I said before, he simply can't. Basic questions only result in goofy one-liners and side-steps.
Click to expand...

Yes, crawl back into your little cubicle and surrender (like CN).
Then repeat, "There is no bigfoot (please), there is no bigfoot (please)..."

ETA: monkutare
 
I repair traffic signals here in Honolulu. Regularly, at work, we get phone calls from self declared smart people (I'm a doctor!, I'm a lawyer, I know the Mayor!) who can't figure out how to push a button to cross the street.
Click to expand...

Bigfoot never gets hit by vehicles...
 
mots, :bike:


In regards to post 8259 your sidestepping is typical of a bigfoot story put under scrutiny. This one kind of started real slow then fizzled out all together.

I left you an easy out, you could have simply said you didn’t remember where the cabin was and I would have let it go, or, you could have just marked where you thought it was.

Did you not notice the fire/logging/spur roads to the east and west of the Olympic Pipeline? Since you live on a Rock I’ll try to explain what those roads indicate. The majority of the area has been logged, and it will in the future be logged again. It’s what is called Commercial Forestry; the only people that live in an area zoned for Commercial Forestry live out of tents or trailers, some people call it camping. If my recollection of the area is correct there are some 5 -10 acre plots on the NW side of the knoll/hill that continue down to the vicinity of I-5, (I’m not sure what they’re zoned for) but that’s pretty much it. Around the base of the knoll/hill there are many private residences, on the knoll/hill itself, no. I could probably dig-up a zoning map if I have not made myself crystal clear.

Do you have another story for us, or is this pretty much it?


It’s supposed to blow here tomorrow night, I need to find some dead batteries to put into my cameras and recording devices so I have an excuse for not obtaining any audio or visual proof of bigfoot as he pounds on the house. I’m certain it wasn’t the ladder I heard the other night. I can’t really run anywhere when it happens so I’ll put a blanket over my head and turn the TV up real loud. My god, I hope the power doesn’t go out, and what about lightning, crap, possible bigfoot shadows. I’m starting to freak myself out, gotta go.


m
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom