Bigfoot: The Invisible Variety

[Locknar]

Neil/Neal/Historian - I've read through this thread, asked questions which you've been kind enough to answer...I've concluded that Gen McAuliffe had it right when he wrote “Nuts!” (in reply to the German Commanders request for the US to surrender during the Battle of Bastogne).

Limiting discussion to this thread on the "invisible Bigfoot", every point you have tried to make is simply wrong or you have otherwise been unable to support with any proof other then “because I said it” (to paraphrase).

You don’t find it odd, for example, that only YOU remember Jimmy Carter talking about Bigfoot…no proof, no dates, nobody else remembers, only once news source (Vanderbilt, the world leader in presidential news I guess)? If someone where to ask Carter, and he denied it...would you accept that, or simply write it off as "the NSA agents got to him"?

You, and only you, remember Stephen Hawking making similar claims wrt Bigfoot…no proof, no dates, nobody else remember but you. Even when conclusively proven Hawking was never a student or Associate Professor (as you remember) at Berkely you refuse to recant.

You talk about Bigfoot researchers suddenly “disappearing”, yet offer no proof (names for example) when asked.

You claim to have a photograph, worth millions, that proves Bigfoot but you won’t show it anyone…people have tried to break into your house to get it, yet when later asked about it you say it does not show anything at all.

You claim to have a video that proves Bigfoot but you won’t show it to anyone…

The entire "NSA agent" discussion (from their "supermole" to microwave use to erase electronic data)...let alone claims of the "British NSA"....

And quite frankly, the list of insane claims goes on, and on, and on…and on.

All of which, you offer no proof. By definition, this behavior is labeled as “insanity”…please seek professional mental help as soon as you possibly can.

 

[Drewbot]

This may be the greatest quote I have ever read.

The evidence is already in front of you, you just don't see it as evidence. No bigfoot bones have never been found. That is evidence that no bigfoot bones exist.

No bigfeet have never been found either, wait is that a double negative?, now I don't know what to think. I think I know what it is supposed to mean, and I love it!

 

[historian]

Neil/Neal/Historian - I've read through this thread, asked questions which you've been kind enough to answer...I've concluded that Gen McAuliffe had it right when he wrote “Nuts!” (in reply to the German Commanders request for the US to surrender during the Battle of Bastogne).

Limiting discussion to this thread on the "invisible Bigfoot", every point you have tried to make is simply wrong or you have otherwise been unable to support with any proof other then “because I said it” (to paraphrase).

You don’t find it odd, for example, that only YOU remember Jimmy Carter talking about Bigfoot…no proof, no dates, nobody else remembers, only once news source (Vanderbilt, the world leader in presidential news I guess)? If someone where to ask Carter, and he denied it...would you accept that, or simply write it off as "the NSA agents got to him"?

You, and only you, remember Stephen Hawking making similar claims wrt Bigfoot…no proof, no dates, nobody else remember but you. Even when conclusively proven Hawking was never a student or Associate Professor (as you remember) at Berkely you refuse to recant.

You talk about Bigfoot researchers suddenly “disappearing”, yet offer no proof (names for example) when asked.

You claim to have a photograph, worth millions, that proves Bigfoot but you won’t show it anyone…people have tried to break into your house to get it, yet when later asked about it you say it does not show anything at all.

You claim to have a video that proves Bigfoot but you won’t show it to anyone…

The entire "NSA agent" discussion (from their "supermole" to microwave use to erase electronic data)...let alone claims of the "British NSA"....

And quite frankly, the list of insane claims goes on, and on, and on…and on.

All of which, you offer no proof. By definition, this behavior is labeled as “insanity”…please seek professional mental help as soon as you possibly can.

Looks like Locknar can't psychologically deal with the Bigfoot being invisible most of the time. So he chooses to attack me in order to vent his insecurity. Demanding proof after proof after proof, is early signs of a psychological breakdown. GET A SHRINK!

 

[historian]

Well, as you can probably tell from my two previous posts I have survived the night; though just barely.

Between 9pm – 12am, I went outside once an hour and yelled various Bigfoot taunts, insults, etc. “yo mama” jokes, and talking about the “How to Cook a Bigfoot” cookbook were popular.

I went to bed after the midnight “taunt”, and that is where this tale or horror begins. I laid awake in bed, unable to sleep, scared about what might happen…that lasted about a minute befor falling fast asleep, trying to dream of hurting (dare I say cooking) Bigfoot as was suggested.

I awoke to a horrible noise….could this be it? Could Bigfoot be attacking? Naw…just my alarm clock.

A quick look outside, worried the woods might have been destroyed…nope, trees and all still right where I left them last night.

I checked with Harvey and he confirmed, no signs of any Bigfoot activity last night.

Notice everyone, that Locknar didn't have the cahoanes to sleep outside in a relatively unprotected sleeping bag. This tends to show that he is now afraid for his life. Instead, he chose to seek shelter inside of a home with solid walls and a solid roof. So what he sees as some kind of genuine experiement, is tainted from the get go. Can Locknar PROVE that he shouted anything? Of course not. So using his reasoning, THEN LOCKNAR IS CALLING HIMSELF A LIAR.

Edited by prewitt81: 

Incivility removed

Historian, please remain civil and polite.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: prewitt81

 

[historian]

I think everyone in this thread can agree with you there; I'm glad that is now solved.

ETA - Stephen Hawkin was never an Associate Professor at Berkely, though has frequently been a guest lecturer there.

All professors of some importance take sabatical leave. Hawking does not list where he took sabatical leave, because he came to the United States to study Bigfoot, primarily by studying the then top secret DOD Bigfoot captivity report from Lawrence Livermore National Labs in the 60's. Maybe we should ask him a really stupid question, since stupidity oozes out of this thread, why pray tell did the world's smartest human being not put what I just described in his resume? Think about it. If you haven't come up with an answer, then you just flunked the Bigfoot I.Q. test, and should not be posting anywhere on the internet, much less on a Bigfoot invisibility thread.

HAWKING DOES NOT LIST WHERE HE TOOK HIS SABATICAL LEAVE BECAUSE HE HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE ABOUT THAT LEAVE! His full year studying the paranormal Bigfoot!

 

[historian]

Odd, I thought Hawking was always a professor at Cambridge. So yes historian, you are imagining things. Lots and lots of things.

So what you thought, you are now converting to FACT, and can then proclaim that someone else is imagining things instead of yourself? Gee, where to I find those same smart pills that you are taking? On a street corner, perhaps?

 

[madurobob]

Yes, you did imagine it. Stephen Hawking studied at Oxford as a student and has been at Cambridge University since he graduated. He may have been invited as a guest lecturer to U.C. Berkely, but he certainly never spent time sitting around on the sidewalk ranting at people. The only reasonable response to your post is in fact "I know you are, but what am I".

In all fairness, you did get one thing right. Hawking was in a wheelchair at least as far back as 1974, and possibly before that.

Hawking did work extensively with Jim Hartle, they wrote at least one book together. Hartle was (is?) at U. CAL Santa Barbara. So, I have to admit its possible that Hawking visited Berkeley as a side trip when working with Hartle.

I must admit, its a fun mental image: Hawking rolling up and down the sidewalks ranting like a street corner preacher about the nature of time and the paranormal bigfoot. Makes me smile every time!

 

[Locknar]

Hawking does not list where he took sabatical leave <SNIP> Maybe we should ask him a really stupid question, since stupidity oozes out of this thread, why pray tell did the world's smartest human being not put what I just described in his resume?

Umm...I'm thinking he did not put it on his resume because he didn't do it.

 

[Locknar]

Notice everyone, that Locknar didn't have the cahoanes to sleep outside in a relatively unprotected sleeping bag. This tends to show that he is now afraid for his life. Instead, he chose to seek shelter inside of a home with solid walls and a solid roof. So what he sees as some kind of genuine experiement, is tainted from the get go. Can Locknar PROVE that he shouted anything? Of course not. So using his reasoning, THEN LOCKNAR IS CALLING HIMSELF A LIAR. Bigfoot don't often hang around the backyards of morons. I am not saying that Locknar is a moron here. But the possibility certainly exists. After all, Locknar can't proof that he is NOT a moron. So we then must naturally assume that LOCNAR IS A MORON, using Locknar's logic as described above. In conclusion, in applying the Locknar method to Locknar's own posting, Locknar is calling himself both a LIAR AND A MORON. I can't argue with that.

Oh, I'll do the outside bit tonight...after leveling similar taunts. Though of course, another way to look at it...after being so humiliated by my evil taunts, Bigfoot was simply to afraid to show up and do anything...didn't tip over any flower pots, destroy any woods, etc.

Though for what its worth I slept with the sliding glass door open on the first floor...only a weak, mesh screen between me and a royally ticked off Bigfoot, a mear 10ft from me to the woods...certianly this mesh screen would be no match for the mighty one?

 

[Locknar]

So what you thought, you are now converting to FACT, and can then proclaim that someone else is imagining things instead of yourself? Gee, where to I find those same smart pills that you are taking? On a street corner, perhaps?

Speaking of converting thought to FACT...how is the date, location, etc. for the Jimmy Carter press conference you've imagined coming along?

 

[Locknar]

Looks like Locknar can't psychologically deal with the Bigfoot being invisible most of the time. So he chooses to attack me in order to vent his insecurity. Demanding proof after proof after proof, is early signs of a psychological breakdown. GET A SHRINK!

Your saying it's so does not make it such; even Harvey agrees with me on this one. Fact is, you can not provide even the most basic proof or evidence to support any of your various insane claims.

Of course, I/we (others in this thread) could adopt your logic and simply proclaim "there is no such thing as invisiable Bigfoot" - thus since I've just said it, it must be so. Prove me wrong....or course you can't since you have no proof and otherwise make up "facts" to fit your fantasy (such as Carter, Hawking, "NSA agents", and your other insane claims).

 

[bruto]

All professors of some importance take sabatical leave. Hawking does not list where he took sabatical leave, because he came to the United States to study Bigfoot, primarily by studying the then top secret DOD Bigfoot captivity report from Lawrence Livermore National Labs in the 60's. Maybe we should ask him a really stupid question, since stupidity oozes out of this thread, why pray tell did the world's smartest human being not put what I just described in his resume? Think about it. If you haven't come up with an answer, then you just flunked the Bigfoot I.Q. test, and should not be posting anywhere on the internet, much less on a Bigfoot invisibility thread.

HAWKING DOES NOT LIST WHERE HE TOOK HIS SABATICAL LEAVE BECAUSE HE HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE ABOUT THAT LEAVE! His full year studying the paranormal Bigfoot!

I see that as usual you've covered your bases, since you are now prepared to call Dr. Hawking, any associate of his, or any biographer of his, a liar if his version disagrees with yours.

If this was something to hide, was it not rather careless of Dr. Hawking to trundle around the campus in his wheelchair discoursing in public about paranormal bigfoots? A whole year chopped out of the resumé of an already famous and conspicuous scientist, and nobody on earth but you has caught on? You claim, in part as corroboration for your story, that Hawking is one of the smartest people on earth, but that's got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.

Stupidity does not ooze from this thread, it gushes.

 

[Locknar]

<snip> Dr. Hawking to trundle around the campus in his wheelchair discoursing in public about paranormal bigfoots?

I can see it now....

"Hey...I'm on a secret sabatical, studying invisiable Bigfoot...who wants to hear about it!!" as he trundles about campus....

I can't stop laughing.

 

[Drewbot]

I emailed Dr. Hawking and asked him what the results of his Bigfoot Study were. We shall see, he usually get's back to me within 6 hours or so.

 

[Locknar]

I emailed Dr. Hawking and asked him what the results of his Bigfoot Study were. We shall see, he usually get's back to me within 6 hours or so.

You may need to allow for an extra hour, as I'm sure he'll spend at least that long laughing.....that is, unless he is trundleing about some college campus rambeling about his Bigfoot study to anyone that will listen.

 

[kitakaze]

I guess I'm not a very good NSA created bigfoot invisibility disinformation AI, having allowed our hated maverick researcher Burgstahler to divulge so much information concerning us and our involvment with The Unseen Ones, Twice Removed.

Here's Stephen Hawking at Berkeley in March of this year giving extensive lectures to sold out crowds. No mentions of The Unseen Ones:

http://ls.berkeley.edu/hawking.html

We have succeeded in altering his voice synthesizing software so that whenever he tries to speak of The Unseen Ones it comes out as some witty joke concerning the accent of the synthesizer.

Here is Burgstahler being berated by Beckjord for his inferior research capabilities. Scroll near the bottom of the page. Neal is 'bignlittlefoot'.

http://www.network54.com/Forum/161117/viewall-page-91

Here Burgstahler gives us the science of The Unseen Ones:

silvereagle responds:
March 2nd, 2007 at 1:36 pm
MBFH, The theory that you are referring to has to do entirely with attributes of the spatial dimensions. Some mistakenly believe that the 4th dimension is a spatial dimension, which it is not. Nor does the 4th dimension exist at right angles to any 3 dimensional vectors. That is a BS theory they came up with in about 1967, and failed to take it off the books. The theory that I am referring to has only 3 spatial dimensions with the attached 4th dimension being a vibrational dimension. More specifically, the 4th dimension is a sub-atomic vibrational measure of quanta strings as I recall, that has both a direction and a magnitude associated with the 4th dimension theoretical vector that represents that vibration. The x, y and z vectors that depict a 3 dimensional world, all have a specific direction and magnitude as well. Light has frequency and thus vibration. So by changing frequency of vibration, you change the reflected light. When you change frequency of vibration, you then likely also change the sub-atomic force fields that make that object solid to other objects that exist in the same dimension. Objects of a different 4th dimensional vibration from each other, could then likely pass through one another, or even pass through a 3 dimensional object as well.

Bigfoot does not just exist in the 4th dimension, they just have the capability to exist in the 4th dimension as well as in our 3 dimensions.

Want The Burg to give you an encounter with The Unseen?

http://www.bigfootondemand.net

http://www.bigfootondemand.com/

Want to see The Burg spreading The Word? Just search 'Lawrence Livermore National Labs bigfoot'.

Want to see The Burg?

http://www.sunset70.com/2005 Reunion pics/100-0069_img.htm

Any NSA spooks there?

 

[Cuddles]

Notice everyone, that Locknar didn't have the cahoanes to sleep outside in a relatively unprotected sleeping bag. This tends to show that he is now afraid for his life. Instead, he chose to seek shelter inside of a home with solid walls and a solid roof.

A casual viewing of the documentary "Abominable" shows that visible bigfoots are quite capable of breaking into solid houses and eating everyone inside. Bits of them at least. Are invisible bigfeet not as strong or something? If they can knock down trees, why can't they get in a house?

 

[Locknar]

A casual viewing of the documentary "Abominable" shows that visible bigfoots are quite capable of breaking into solid houses and eating everyone inside. Bits of them at least. Are invisible bigfeet not as strong or something? If they can knock down trees, why can't they get in a house?

Apparently the mesh screen in my sliding glass door was to formidable for them to over come last night. I'll be outside tonight, I sure hope my sleeping bag does not pose a similar impenetrable barrier.

 

[Alan G]

If Bigfoot is invisible why does he only go dimension jumping in the middle of nowhere? Surely he can mingle in the crowds of christmas shopping in any city centre anywhere in the world? Why would Hawking have to go to the US to study him, surely he could just find a spare room at his own university and blow on his Bigfoot whistle.

 

[RayG]

Neal is 'bignlittlefoot'.

That's hilarious. He rants at Beckjump thus:

Mr. Bonk, you make claim after claim on this message board that bigfoot can do this and bigfoot can do that, yet you provide absolutely no proof for your claims. While simultaneously you demand that other contributors prove their observations or conclusions. You should change your name to MR. DOUBLE STANDARD.

Speaking of double standards Neal... aren't you doing exactly the same thing here on this forum?

RayG