• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why is homosexuality wrong?

Can we get some new tripe, I'm tired of the same old tripe.

Let's talk about the immorality of cotton/polyester blends. I think XenonII should be concerned about the way that Wal*Mart is spreading the cotton/polyester agenda around God's #1 favoritist nation.

I just had my hair cut yesterday. It was part of my homosexual agenda assignment for the day to help destroy the moral fabric of America. The nice homosexual fellow that was cutting the hair on the sides of my head (Leviticus 19:27) offered to trim my beard for me as well. But I wanted to commit that abomination myself (Leviticus 21:5) so I came home to the house I share with my HOMOSEXUAL partner, and I trimmed the corners of my beard deliberately.

I noticed at the time that there were no puny-assed Imaginary Bearded Sky Daddies that were powerful enough to do anything about it, even though I was wantonly trimming the corners of my beard on purpose to make the Baby Jesus cry. Ha Ha!

Soon I'll be attending an atheist wedding of my atheist daughter to her atheist fiancee. She wanted to be sure both of her queer daddies were there at the atheist ceremony conducted by an atheist Justice of the Peace. There will be absolutely no Jebus whatsoever. Great kid, great kid. I taught her how to recognize bovine fecal matter from the day she were just a wee lass.

I noticed that, since marriage is a CIVIL CONTRACT she did not need to ask any representative of any Imaginary Bearded Sky Daddy for a license. The marriage license was issued by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Marriage is a legal contract that has nothing to do with ancient superstitions that are desperately clung to like a sinking ship by pathetic and bigoted losers that are too dumb to realize it is all just a bunch of idiotic fairy tales made up by bitter old ancient social misfits.
 
My only comment ist he only phrase from the Bible that I actually admire.

"Let he who is without sin throw the first stone."

No one is throwing stones just being in agreement with the Bible and reiterating what God's Word says. We are commanded to preach the Gosepl to the unsaved. It is our duty for their souls are in grave danger of eternal judgement.
 
Well, it could have been worse. You could have discovered that your best friend was racist or sexist, rather than just homophobic.

Always look on the "bright" side of life.

Linda

I am not "homophobic". Homophobia is a made up term by homosexual activists to describe anyone that disagrees with their choice of lifestyle and their radical agenda. It is used to silence opposition. A phobia is a fear. I do not fear the "gays", I mearly oppose what they do for religious reasons. It is an abomination.
 
My favorite is "Judge not, that ye be not judged."

It most certainly is our place to judge, the Biblical admonition you are attempting to employ is meant in the context that if (for example), you judge someone to be a thief, but if you are yourself a thief, you are not qualified
or justified in judging the thievery of the accused.

Likewise, if one does not engage in the sin of homosexuality as defined in God's Word, they are most certainly qualified to judge those who do.

We do not judge however, where any person will spend eternity for that is indeed, God's Role as the Almighty and the Creator. We can however, stand firmly upon God's Word as revealed in the Bible, and judge that which is holy, and that which is depraved.
 
Is it true that most of the most virulent anti-homesexuals are actually closet gays themselves? When was the last time you had a homosexual thought, XenonII?
 
Is it true that most of the most virulent anti-homesexuals are actually closet gays themselves? When was the last time you had a homosexual thought, XenonII?

Yeah, XenonII,

And are you an elected republican official by chance? http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/...g-republican-caught-in-sting-ends-senate-bid/

Or just a bible thumping Ted Haggard type?


(Doubting Stephen, you make the gay agenda sound so damn fun... it's a pity I have no facial hair to trim-- what's next on the agenda? And can I play too?)
 
The proof is in their words and actions. "You will know them by their fruits" - Matthew 7:20 (and there are plenty of "fruits" amongst the liberal crowd). :D

Oooohh... :rolleyes:

Hm, I wonder why fruits are a label for homosexuals.
 
Yup. I'm heterosexual because I freely chose it. One day I just decided that I'd go through life preferring to have sex with women. A purely rational choice on my part.

I also decided that I'd have brown hair and blue eyes. And that I'd be right handed. These I chose at the age of 9.

When I was 10, I decided that I'd forgo acne, and try autism instead.

Of course, I reserve the right to change my mind. Next week I might want to have sex with men, and be left handed and blond. It's purely by choice, after all.
 
It's more than just believing He exists (God and Jesus being the same individual briefly splitting into two seperate, but connected through the Holy Spirit, beings during Jesus' time on Earth), it's believing what He stands for and living accordingly.

Satan is not saved technically or otherwise, Satan is DOOMED! After the thousand years of imprisonment, Satan will be released for a short while. During his parole, he will again unite some of the nations and take them to war against God's people (sounds a bit like Osama bin Laden doesn't it?!). But this rebellion will be summarily ended when God sends fire out of heaven to destroy them. Because he is spirit and cannot die, the Devil will then be sentenced to eternal torment in the Lake of Fire. Finally, God and man will be rid of their chief enemy, and peace will flourish for all eternity! - Revelation 20:7-10.

Wow, I'm glad we don't have many people like you in Australia
 
I am not "homophobic". Homophobia is a made up term by homosexual activists to describe anyone that disagrees with their choice of lifestyle and their radical agenda. It is used to silence opposition. A phobia is a fear. I do not fear the "gays", I mearly oppose what they do for religious reasons. It is an abomination.

The word "phobia" (in non medical terms) simply refers to a strong or irrational fear or dislike or something, the word abomination has three main meanings, usually given as something that you find horrible, something you find shameful or an intense dislike.

So unless you want to change the common meaning of a word (something you apparently objected to when you thought male homosexuals had "hijacked" the word "gay") you are, by definition of the word, homophobic.
 
I am not "homophobic". Homophobia is a made up term by homosexual activists to describe anyone that disagrees with their choice of lifestyle and their radical agenda. It is used to silence opposition. A phobia is a fear. I do not fear the "gays", I mearly oppose what they do for religious reasons. It is an abomination.

You, sir, are an idiot.
 
You, sir, are an idiot.

well put.

Yes, but unfortunately not all that helpful. While I agree that ridicule is frequently the only weapon we can bring to bear against such people, since they will ignore everything else, I can't bring myself to believing that straightforward insults are the best way to deal with them. So while I agree with your sentiment in principle, I suggest that it does not serve any real purpose to post it.
 
Yes, but unfortunately not all that helpful. While I agree that ridicule is frequently the only weapon we can bring to bear against such people, since they will ignore everything else, I can't bring myself to believing that straightforward insults are the best way to deal with them. So while I agree with your sentiment in principle, I suggest that it does not serve any real purpose to post it.

maybe not, but it does release some frustration
 
Wow, I'm glad we don't have many people like you in Australia

Personally I'm glad that according to him I'm going to hell rather than heaven as an eternity spent with people like him would be far more hellish.
 
Yes, but unfortunately not all that helpful. While I agree that ridicule is frequently the only weapon we can bring to bear against such people, since they will ignore everything else, I can't bring myself to believing that straightforward insults are the best way to deal with them. So while I agree with your sentiment in principle, I suggest that it does not serve any real purpose to post it.

Yes, because XenonII has shown such a great response to well thought out, constructive posts.
 

Back
Top Bottom