• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why is homosexuality wrong?

Bestiality has victims? What if the animal wants it and the person manhandling the beast is gentle? ;)

Incest doesn't quite have victims if both partners are willing. The problem comes when you have kids.
 
Last edited:
Having proper morals and faith in God's Holy Word does not make one a troll. Neither does disagreeing with the abomination that is the homosexual lifestyle, so called same-sex "marriage" or the radical "gay" agenda.

If someone has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey his father and mother, who does not heed them when they discipline him, then his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his town. ... Then all the men of the town shall stone him to death. (Deuteronomy 21:18,19;21)

Are you offering this law as a Christ given law or as an Antichrist given law?

Strange that in genesis even a murderer could not be touched and here we have parents killing their children. Stange.

Regards
DL
 
Sex is not supposed to be a recreational hobby that one engages in "just for the fun of it". Birth control is highly immoral. It perverts God's intended function for sexual activity. It closes the door on procreation. Using any form of birth control is a grave SIN!


Is this why the Vatican finally sold off it's prophylactic stock.

Regards
DL
 
Religion doesn't follow any rule that all crimes must have victims. What about the prohibitions in the Old Testament against eating owls, eagles, and bats? Or keeping the Sabbath holy?

I think it comes down to this: some people find some behaviors so repugnant that they would prefer that nobody acts that way. They then seek to impose their beliefs on others to prevent them from performing that offensive behavior.

"Why can't they just mind their own business?" you may ask. Yes, very good question.
 
I vote we all butt out and let the two religious fundies argue it out for amusement value.
 
I vote we all butt out and let the two religious fundies argue it out for amusement value.
I agree. This deep probing into their anal retentive psyche is a bit too personal. I'd rather withdraw now before someone erupts in frustration.
 

It appears to go against His usual justice.

Your mistake here is that you're trying to assign reasonable thinking to an irrational belief. The biblical god is absurd, and as such, has many contradictory positions and many silly, arbitrary rules that make no sense.
 
If others can speak for God then so can I.

Hey, that's actually quite a cool principle!

God just told me to tell you this:

God said:
Dear Creation. I know I haven't been around much lately, but I'd like you to know that all this business with the wars you've got going on now is really quite amusing. It almost makes up for the general lack of brutal stonings of disobedient children these days. Almost.

Also, all you people who claim that morals only derive from my Divine Word, as of today the Divine Word is that murder and idol-worship is now moral, but only on tuesdays in odd-numbered months. Needless to say, the reverse is also true: On the aforementioned days, failure to commit murder and idolatry will be considered a grave sin, so get moving. There's bonus heavenly cookie points for effort.

If any of this is distasteful to you, well, tough luck. You can try filing a complaint (three copies, notarized) through the usual channels, but don't expect any miracles.

...

And quit groveling!

Trust me. God and me are like this.
 
I do not read the Bible literally and can find God within it's pages.

Of course, a true believer can find his god in the toilet as well.

There is no doubt that the Bible is now our tree of knowledge of good and evil.

There is plenty of doubt. Maybe not in your mind, but I'm 100% certain that morality existed long before the Hebrews even came up with monotheism.

We just need to dither out who is saying what.

Since this is true, it means that it is not "god" that is determining morality, but the person doing the "dithering."
 
If others can speak for God then so can I.
I am closer to Him than most.
Trust me.

Regards
DL

Ask your god why he's such a pathetic wrestler that he lost to a mere mortal, according to the bible.

I can tap your god out, I'm calling him out. Bring it.
 
The homosexual lifestyle is so damaging to the individual's health who practices it that it has found to be more deadly even than smoking! The homosexual lifestyle knocks decades off of a persons lifespan. The median age of death of homosexual males is 42 (only 9% live past age 65). This drops to 39 if the cause of death is AIDS. The median age of death of a married heterosexual man is 75. The median age of death of "lesbians" is 45 (only 24% live past age 65). The median age of death of a married heterosexual woman is 79.

This is all BS. These "statistics" come from Paul Cameron, who was expelled from the American Psychological Association for misrepresenting the work of others and repeatedly using unsound methods in his own studies. These figures were obtained by recording and comparing obituaries from regular newspapers and homosexual newspapers. These homosexual newspapers do not record all deaths of homosexuals within the community. Unlike a typical newspaper obituary which is meant as a record of deaths in the population as a whole, the obituaries in the gay newspapers are used by friends and peers to mourn the loss of individuals in the gay community, particularly those who have died young from illness or accident. The result is a laughably invalid survey.
 
Same difference, they are both sins and I don't condemn anyone I just repeat what God has said through the Bible. Jesus may have not condemned her but he didn't accept her sin either. He told her to go and sin no more. If she repented before death she would have been saved but if she died in her sins then she is in hell amongst the many millions that are already there.


There is a big difference. You stated that female prostitution is a sin according to the bible, and brought this up as an example. You are wrong, this woman was not a prostitute, but an adulterer. You are again making things up as to what is and is not in the bible.
 
XenonII said:
However, Dr. Daniel Capron, a practicing psychiatrist, says, "Homosexuality by definition is not healthy and wholesome. The homosexual person, at best, will be unhappier and more unfulfilled than the sexually normal person".
By definition?
Well he's got a point. Unless you want to dispute the fact that a married couple who engages in sexual activity purely for their own pleasure will, at best, be unhappier and more unfulfilled than a married couple who only engage in sex with the intent of having a child.
 
Well he's got a point. Unless you want to dispute the fact that a married couple who engages in sexual activity purely for their own pleasure will, at best, be unhappier and more unfulfilled than a married couple who only engage in sex with the intent of having a child.
Oh, I see my mistake. I thought he was using the english language. Instead, he was speaking in crazy.
 
I vote we all butt out and let the two religious fundies argue it out for amusement value.

It could be one of the biggest rumbles ever. Right up there with Tyson vs. Secretariat and Griffin vs. Giant Chicken.
 

Attachments

  • 24401FamilyGuyPetervChickenPosters.jpg
    24401FamilyGuyPetervChickenPosters.jpg
    84.1 KB · Views: 4
Nothing is wrong with people loving people, no matter what the 'sex' is.

That's easy for you to say ..

nannydvd3.jpg


I would guess, this lady has never asked you for a date ...
 

Back
Top Bottom