• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]Pentagon Struck By Tomahawk Missile 'AND' A PLANE

So, let me get this straight. A government, that has no remorse about killing 3000 of its own people, cares so much about the lives of Flight 77's 80-ish passengers that instead of simply crashing the plane into the Pentagon, they land it in some secret base, then shoot a missile (which no eyewitnesses saw or heard and for which there is no physical evidence) at the Pentagon. Then, to cover up the fact that they shot a missile into the Pentagon, they took ANOTHER plane, which they actually DID crash into the Pentagon, which wasn't an airliner even though every eyewitness at the scene thought it was and the plane parts at the Pentagon are that of an airliner.

So, uh, please enlighten us as to the point of sending a missile and a plane into the exact same spot.
 
And I just realized that someone needs to pre-empt another common woo-woo theory concerning what the fire fighters are doing standing around with their nozzles in their hands, but not spraying anything down or approaching the foam blanket.

The nozzles in question are attached to airfield fire fighting apparatus, self contained units with an enormous, but not inexhaustable water tank and foam reservoirs. They had done the work of putting out any class B fires outside the building, and were doing over-watch against re-ignition of the class B fuels. They would have mostly been in the way of the crews of any structural fire fighting rigs, such as the red one off to the left of the yellow crash rigs. Stepping on the foam blanket would raise the possibility of a flashback if the fuel was still hot enough under it.

The idle fire fighters are often pointed out in arguments such as those presented by the French criminal Bunel as evidence that there was no great deal of class B fuel on the site, which is also vital to supporting the A-3 theory. Bunel ignores the fact that most of the jet fuel had been eitther flared off on impact or shoved inside the building with the majority of the aircraft parts. Inside a building, as I have been informed when working as a fire guard for a local fishing company, water fog is considered the best fire fighting tactic for class B fuels, in as much as there are irregular surfaces to cover and places where fuel can accumulate out of reach of foam.
 
I'm still trying to understand the "why" of it. It is like claiming that someone was stabbed 7 times with an icepick, and then 30 minutes later the killer came back and shot the person 7 times, hitting an icepick wound each time, to "cover up" the stabbing.

The whole thing is completely deranged.


I like this analogy. It clearly shows the stupidity in the original idea.
 
the OP is the definition of spam and devoid of facts, nice job

Hi Nim:

Thank you for writing.

Yes! You win the award for using 14 words to convey an opinion apart from supporting anything with credible evidence. Just show us your pictures of Flight 77 crashed ANYWHERE and you win the prize. :0) GL, because none exist anywhere. A quick look up the thread show you guys chatting and all the pictures are posted by me. Here is a nice Page 1 Picture taken after the attacks and before the E-Ring wall collapsed:

Someone please point to your 100-Ton Jetliner or even a piece of paper on the lawn. Show us one of these ( http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/wtcnorthhole.jpg ) entry holes where the Jetliner crashed through.

GL,

Terral
Fantasy devoid of facts, devoid of reason, devoid of rational thought. How can you manufacture so much junk and avoid evidence and facts?

When will 9/11 truth find facts?
When will 9/11 truth stop making up lies about 9/11?

Never
 
A problem with this theory is that Tomahawk missiles don't work that way. To get it to do what you suppose it would take a total reworking of the programming for impact and guidence and changing of the warhead as well. There isn't a missile in the US inventory, or any other that I'm aware, that would make that kind of impact on that trajectory at the same time.
 
Hi Nim:

Yes! You win the award for using 14 words to convey an opinion apart from supporting anything with credible evidence. Just show us your pictures of Flight 77 crashed ANYWHERE and you win the prize. :0) GL, because none exist anywhere.
GL,

Terral

hullpiece.jpg


enginerotor.jpg


P200030_1.jpg


diffuser.jpg


landinggear.jpg
 
. . . I put too much effort in my work to have you just throw it away by people without a case for anything . . .

Terral

The people who made "Revenge of the Sith" put a lot of effort into it, but it still sucks.
 
A member of this forum was at the Pentagon that day and laid his hands on pieces of the plane. I will take his word over any fourth-rate preschool level photo-analysis...
 
It occurs to me that with most warheads delivered by the Tomahawk missle there would be alot less Pentagon left after it hit.

Well, they didn't actualy ARM the warheads...gosh...that would make it way too obvious :P
 

I'd just like to point out for the 10 trillionth time that, despite what you see in Jerry Bruckheimer films, high explosives do not create billowing orange fireballs.

In fact, you know what substance special effects crews frequently use to create those visuals in the aforementioned movies? Kerosene.

Guess what kerosene is also used in?

Hint: it rhymes with "Fet Jewel".
 
Last edited:
tripe, tripe left over from junk rejected by 9/11 truth

tripe, just tripe left over from junk rejected by 9/11 truth

could the OP poster, or anyone, please pm me when there are some facts to support his tripe
 
I like this analogy. It clearly shows the stupidity in the original idea.

That's the thing: this whole nonsense isn't about evidence, it is about a fundamental (possibly intentional) misunderstanding about the way the world works. So, instead of debating evidence, which is completely beside the point, we need to get at the basic flawed thinking at the heart of the CT BS.

So, look at the OP. Why even pretend that evidence matters? What we need to get through to people is that their fundamental view of the situation is wrong and outrageously illogical.
 
We ‘do’ have documented evidence that the ‘initial’ attack on the Pentagon took place at exactly 9:31:39, because the Pentagon had battery operated Navy clocks very near this location that stopped suddenly from the electromagnetic pulse emitted by the missile at the moment of detonation.

...
Terral




So now it's a nuclear tipped Tomahawk?


That is so going in a comic!


Thanks!
 

Back
Top Bottom