• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]Pentagon Struck By Tomahawk Missile 'AND' A PLANE

Do you guys have contests to see who can come up with the dumbest twists on the already dumb CTs?
 
buka001 said:
Now the fun and games begin!!

Can you clarify certain aspects in your theory:

1) How did the Tomahawk missile knock and buckle the lamp posts? Please provide valid scientific calculations proving this.

2) Account for the witness testimony that saw a jet liner strike the pentagon.

3) Account for the aircraft debris seen on the crash site.

4) Account for the human remains from the passengers in the aircraft, found on the crash site.

5) Prove that the fireman you see in the photograph are suppose to be fighting the fire (you annotate your photograph saying Nobody is fighting the fire - what are you implying here). Is it not plausible that their job is to provide logistical support outside the building? Could they be relief fireman? Im sure YCHTT will provide an insight to this.

Thank you.
Click to expand...

Allow me. Even though he's new here I have seen his nonsense elsewhere.

1. A "bow" shock wave from the missile knocked down the poles.

2. Thousands of people reportedly see Santa Claus every year, what's the difference? (He actually said this.)

3. WHAT debris??? I have repeatedly asked for proof that a 100 ton airliner crashed there! Your little scraps mean nothing! What's the matter with you people??? Wake up!!!

4. WHAT REMAINS? Prove they weren't planted.

5. NO, YOU PROVE they ARE fighting the fire. THIS is MY OP dammit! This is MY thesis!!! You prove what I ask you or leave MY THREAD!


Crazy people don't know they're crazy.
 
SpaceMonkeyZero said:
And the Moon? The hoax was SO full of Disinfo that they actually sent men to the moon to land, JUST IN CASE THE MOVIE SET IN ARIZONA FAILED!
Click to expand...

Yeah, but they didn't have time to invent spiffy slogans for the real Moon walkers. Good thing the movie set worked, else the sheeple would know what the first human to set foot on another astronomical entity really said: "Man, does this place suck or what?"
 
Awww... c'mon guys... don't do it to me. You know the drill....


Keep it civil.... attack the argument, not the arguer....
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
chillzero said:
Awww... c'mon guys... don't do it to me. You know the drill....


Keep it civil.... attack the argument, not the arguer....
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
Click to expand...

It's so very, very difficult though.
 
Can I play too?

Why is there not a single phone report of the "missile strike" documented in the five minute "window" before the plane struck?

Why would you hit a building with a missile AND an airplane? Isn't that just stupid? And I don't mean "leave the iron on when you go to work" stupid, I mean "leave your baby on top of the car and drive onto the interstate" stupid.
 
The Official DoD Frames Say This Flying Object Has A 20 Inch Diameter

Greetings to All:

Unsecured Coins >> quick!! show me tomahawk missile parts to validify your arguments!!

James B >> You do realize you are completely insane, right?
Click to expand...


Coin’s reply was made in two minutes, which clearly testifies that he made no attempt to even examine the OP evidence. JamesB’s reply is a typical JREF response from someone without a case for anything. Since the DoD has perpetuated this ‘self-inflicted’ wound, they are not going to hand you evidence to convict themselves. That is why of 88 security cameras positioned to watch every move anyone makes on the west side of the Pentagon, they only released two short video clips from two security cameras. The FBI also confiscated the security video footage from the nearby Citgo station and neighboring hotels. :0) Why if they have nothing to hide and want you to see the 911Truth? The DoD did not realize we could extrapolate the vital data from these ‘wide-angle’ security video images to convict them, so they released the video footage some 5 years later at the insistence of http://www.judicialwatch.org ( http://www.911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/dodvideos.html ). The fact is that we can gather the data from these video images to give us a geometric grid map where simple algebraic equations can be generated and solved to provide the approximate diameter of this flying object:

a1-Frame1a.jpg


Every wide-angle lens has a "true" Horizontal X-Axis Plane and a Vertical X-Axis Plane creating a crosshair ( http://www.themcdonalds.net/richard/astro/writings/images/castleFarCrosshair.jpg ) like we see through a builder’s transit level ( http://www.bobvila.com/HowTo_Library/The_Transit_Level--A2060.html ). The size of all objects in any wide-angle lens is skewed in direct proportion to their distance ‘away’ from the 'true' X and Y-Axis planes. We have a series of ‘imaginary’ vertical Y-Axis planes running along the Horizontal X-Axis plane, as if many sheets of glass are standing side-by-side at each horizontal pixel intersection point location. My “Horizontal X-Axis Plane” is located at 5 feet representing the same elevation shared by the Security Camera (we are looking through), the top of the right-hand column, a reference point just above the horizon AND (most importantly) the very nose of our flying object. :0) The math students here know all points on a straight horizontal line have the ‘same’ X value, while all points on the same vertical line have the same Y value. My Y-Axis plane has been moved from the center of this picture to the edge of the right-hand column to locate our new “X-Y Intersection” Point. While the objects this far away from the ‘true Y-Axis Plane’ (center of image) are distorted, we are ONLY using the imaginary X-Y Axis Intersection Point as our reference to identify ‘all’ objects behind that “Magic Spot :0)” (see blow up) as having the ‘same’ 5-feet elevation. The next phase of our information extraction process is to identify the correct ‘ratio’ of the object diameter to the ‘clearance’ underneath.

LloydsShock.jpg


From this image we can determine more accurately that the ‘ratio’ of the clearance underneath this object is between twice and three times the diameter. With this data we can create the algebraic equation:

½X + 2½X = 5 feet. We use ½X, because the 5 feet dimension was taken from the ‘nose’ or the center of the flying object. Solving the equation will give us an approximate diameter size of the flying object like this:

X + 5X = 10 feet
6X = 10 feet
X = 1.666667 feet or 20 inches. :0)

The published diameter of a 109-A Tomahawk Missile is 20.9 inches ( http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-109.html#_SLCM ), which means my theory has a good probability of being somewhere in the ballpark. Someone please check my math. :0)

GL,

Terral
 
Last edited:
BenBurch said:
Sorry its hard when his intent is so clearly not honest.
Click to expand...

Some people just outright lie for whatever reasons. Some are bat guano loony (Killtown.) Some are out to make a buck (Lyte, balsamo.)

It's hard to place intent. But, it's safe to say a bigger ego and more obnoxious posting style would be hard to find.
 
Calcas said:
Some people just outright lie for whatever reasons. Some are bat guano loony (Killtown.) Some are out to make a buck (Lyte, balsamo.)

It's hard to place intent. But, it's safe to say a bigger ego and more obnoxious posting style would be hard to find.
Click to expand...

There are a couple here that would vie for the title.

So Terral, if the government is so good at hiding all the evidence, how is it that you have been able to incover all this? Are all the crash investigators, scientists, etc. the world over unable to figure this out?
 
Hmmmm. I assume that people saw the airliner, because either the missile or the smaller aircraft you claim hit the pentagon were protected by a vast hologram projector.

Still doesn't explain why a person can see the outline of the wing impact by the airliner on the facade of the pentagon. I'll have to think up a good conspiracty for that one.

Wait.. Maybe the firemen standing around outside painted it on!
 
I really don't get it. It seems so obvious to me that people would see two impacts 5 minutes apart, but there is no witnesses that say this. Am I missing something? Can someone explain it to me?
 
Please Support Your Statements With Evidence. TY

Hi Nim:

Thank you for writing.

Nim >> uuhhmmm, Flight 77, an American Airlines jet, hit the pentagon. Do I win something?
Click to expand...


Yes! You win the award for using 14 words to convey an opinion apart from supporting anything with credible evidence. Just show us your pictures of Flight 77 crashed ANYWHERE and you win the prize. :0) GL, because none exist anywhere. A quick look up the thread show you guys chatting and all the pictures are posted by me. Here is a nice Page 1 Picture taken after the attacks and before the E-Ring wall collapsed:

pentfacadebig.jpg


Someone please point to your 100-Ton Jetliner or even a piece of paper on the lawn. Show us one of these ( http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/wtcnorthhole.jpg ) entry holes where the Jetliner crashed through.

GL,

Terral
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom