Ahmadinejad to visit GZ?

Kryptos

Critical Thinker
Kryptos
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
409
Saw some buzz about this on LCF. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is coming to NYC for the UN General Assembly, has asked and been denied a request to visit GZ. He says "9/11 attacks were an inside job, carried out with help of intelligence agents."

http://tinyurl.com/2h7gkw
 
He's been denied, as I understand it, because he wants to go into the area where construction is going on, and they can't guarantee his safety.

That's me speaking rationally. Were I to speak IRrationally, I would say this gigantic b****** should never be allowed anywhere near the site, and if I were around, I'd want to rip his [rule10]ing head off for daring to appear sympathetic toward the victims while in the same breath blaming the US government for that event.
 
Kryptos said:
He says "9/11 attacks were an inside job, carried out with help of intelligence agents."

http://tinyurl.com/2h7gkw
Click to expand...

The supreme commander of his Revolutionary Guard seems to agree with him:

http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=8512

Tehran, Iran, Sep. 06 – The Supreme Commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps accused the Bush Administration and the Israeli security service Mossad of ordering the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and Washington, DC.
Click to expand...
Castro, Chavez and Ahmadinejad, the Axis of Woo.
 
That guy is just pissing on everybody.
He's manufacturing nuclear weapons while the international community demands him to stop and he wants the destruction of the state of Israel.

I say don't let him into the U.S. and make his flight movie be The Spice Girls.

Regards,
Yair
 
Latest AM local news (today, 20th) is that he and his entourage are arranging the GZ visit with the Secret Service, and in fact doesn't need the permission of the NYPD, though presumably he wouldn't be allowed in the actual construction site. You know, that's the great thing about living and working here; there is never a dull moment. (I work in midtown, though perhaps the cavalcade of limos will race down 5th Ave, banners flying.)
 
Let him come. Make sure that victims' family members and NYPD and FDNY are on hand. Make sure that after he gives some little speech that someone follows up and points out how the US gives him rights that US citizens have. Point out that in his country, someone speaking with a dissenting voice would be jailed or killed. Point out that women have little or no voice.

Don't stoop to his level, because you play into his hand. Give him some courtesies and show the world that we aren't afraid of his stupidity.
 
Disbelief said:
Let him come. Make sure that victims' family members and NYPD and FDNY are on hand. Make sure that after he gives some little speech that someone follows up and points out how the US gives him rights that US citizens have. Point out that in his country, someone speaking with a dissenting voice would be jailed or killed. Point out that women have little or no voice.

Don't stoop to his level, because you play into his hand. Give him some courtesies and show the world that we aren't afraid of his stupidity.
Click to expand...

Only problem with this is that pretty much everyone in the world already realizes this (however dimly), and secondly nobody in Iran would be allowed to see it anyway. And somehow, I don't think he would be likely to be personally moved by platitudes.
 
At least he isn't visiting to get re-elected.

Here is a nice link to the laws of Iran, including people's rights, located here.
 
Last edited:
negativ said:
Only problem with this is that pretty much everyone in the world already realizes this (however dimly), and secondly nobody in Iran would be allowed to see it anyway. And somehow, I don't think he would be likely to be personally moved by platitudes.
Click to expand...

But we so often go out of our way to be confrnotational that it is used against us. If we make sure that we let him do his thing and point out the inconsistencies, we come off looking better than if we try and ban him.

Swing, what does that link have to do with anything? Can you tell me how they protect women's rights "in accordance with Islamic law?"
 
Let him only go from JFK to the UN, and back to JFK and back on his plane. He should not be allowed in the United States. But he has the right to go to the UN.
 
Swing Dangler said:
At least he isn't visiting to get re-elected.

Here is a nice link to the laws of Iran, including people's rights, located here.
Click to expand...

Quite interesting. I noticed that "...not detrimental to the fundamental principles of Islam" pretty much qualified every right in the constitution. It means that one merely has to define what the 'fundamental principles of Islam' is to give or deny anyone's rights for just about anything.

Hey. It worked for the Taliban...
 
Last edited:
negativ said:
Only problem with this is that pretty much everyone in the world already realizes this (however dimly), and secondly nobody in Iran would be allowed to see it anyway. And somehow, I don't think he would be likely to be personally moved by platitudes.
Click to expand...

I disagree with everybody in the world knowing what a jackass the President of Iran is,consideirng the amount of whitewashing and justification he seems to get on the Internet.
 
Swing Dangler said:
At least he isn't visiting to get re-elected.

Here is a nice link to the laws of Iran, including people's rights, located here.
Click to expand...


Peoples' rights were "guaranteed" in the laws of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union too.
Please note that the first guy defending the President of Iran is a Truther.
 
This link says that women have rights in Iran IN SPITE OF, not because of, Islamic law. Strict Sharia law would limit these women further.
 
Sabrina said:
This link says that women have rights in Iran IN SPITE OF, not because of, Islamic law. Strict Sharia law would limit these women further.
Click to expand...
That's the one law I would adopt from Iran....Just kidding...keep your shirt on...;)

Regards,
Yair
 
dudalb said:
Peoples' rights were "guaranteed" in the laws of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union too.
Please note that the first guy defending the President of Iran is a Truther.
Click to expand...

It's kind of amazing. I have yet to hear a truther bash Kim Jong Il, Osama, Ahmadinnajacket, or others...
 
SpaceMonkeyZero said:
It's kind of amazing. I have yet to hear a truther bash Kim Jong Il, Osama, Ahmadinnajacket, or others...
Click to expand...

I think it is the "Anybody who opposes Bush and the NWO is on our side" mentality.
The most common example of not seeing a dictator as a dictator for ideological reasons seems to be the Hugo CHavez fan club,though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom