WTC 7 Question - why blow it up?

Reasons to blow it up:

Case for good reasons:
1. To prevent further loss of life and property from another global collapse into other buildings and people.

In which case there would be absolutly no reason to cover up any controlled demolition of WTC 7. However, I daresay that no CD expert in the world would dare attempt it given that the buildinbg was already damaged, was on fire, was at least twice the size of the largest CD ever previously attempted, and was to be done within several hours of the collapse of the towers.

Case for bad reasons:
1. To hamper, stall, or eliminate corporate cases involving Enron and World Com among others.

Hell of a lot easier to simply have a fire rip through the offices.

2. Some think the entire operation may have been run out of the building, so there would be a need to destroy it.

Anything that was in the offices could have been easily removed rather than risk some grunt doing the clean up coming across papers or equipment.


3. Who knows what the CIA had in the building that may have needed a good cleansing probably the lizard overlords in the basement.;)

pesky lizards

4. Cost: Anticipated repairs may have been more than insurance and rebuilding cost.

CD could then have waited and been done months later. It would not affect the insurance claim at all.

5. That pesky command bunker.

What about it? Everyone knew it was there. It was evac'd prior to the collapse of WTC 2

6. A plane that should have hit it did not.???

What?? the CD was on a seven hour timer that could not be stopped? That's worse than "Die Hard II".
 
OK Swing, now that you've had your laugh, do you really believe any of these speculations ?

Believe? You mean as in religious belief? Nope.

I have a hard time accepting as fact the speculations on possible motivations for the CD of WTC 7.

Would I accept some of those as possible motivation, sure. Why not? Human motivation is a powerful thing.
 
If the reason was to cause max effect on the American people then it need not have been WTC 7, it need not have been only WTC complex buildings. Why not wire up the Post Office or Verizon or Banker's Trust, or the Winter Gardens?
 
Believe? You mean as in religious belief?

No, I mean believe as in think it is valid.

I have a hard time accepting as fact the speculations on possible motivations for the CD of WTC 7.
Fair enough. But if you think WTC7 was a CD, you got to have some idea why they decided to blow it up.

Would I accept some of those as possible motivation, sure. Why not? Human motivation is a powerful thing.
Which one is the most probable in your opinion?
 
So they decided to CD the building to avoid further loss of life, but they hid it because they didn't want to get sued?
Sued? I'm not aware of that. I'm not privy to the claim, but if a building is demolished on purpose would the insurance policy pay up? I have no idea.

I would like to see the details behind the court case and the expert testimony involved in those proceedings.
 
If the reason was to cause max effect on the American people then it need not have been WTC 7, it need not have been only WTC complex buildings. Why not wire up the Post Office or Verizon or Banker's Trust, or the Winter Gardens?

Or the Statue of Liberty or even the Empire State.
 
Swing, do you want to be serious about it? Conspiracy or not, is 9/11 just a big joke to you?
 
No, I mean believe as in think it is valid.

Fair enough. But if you think WTC7 was a CD, you got to have some idea why they decided to blow it up.

Now your setting me up! LoL!

Which one is the most probable in your opinion?

Well for the sake of conversation on this boring Monday:

Lets break it down first:

1. Who has the capability to rig the building without interference from local police and local security all without tipping the public off?

2. What tenets within the building would have access to the resources to plan the rigging and to carry out the rigging of the building?

3. Is there a historical record of similar tenets destroying their own residence so to speak or with a record of terrorism?

4. Which tenets would have access to the entire building?

5. Which tenet would most likely hire foreign operatives to maintain "plausible denialbility" if the fire excuse doesn't pan out?

6. Which tenet could have the investigation limited to certain floors and areas?

I'm going to go with the Lizard Overlords from Planet Xenia's NWO.

You?

Please don't alter quotations of other posters.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Katana
 
Last edited by a moderator:
your suggested reasons for blowing up WTC7 are not very compelling, and lack any evidence what so ever...this would not even make it to court, let alone have a chance of winning.

TAM:)
 
Swing, do you want to be serious about it? Conspiracy or not, is 9/11 just a big joke to you?

Of course it is not one big joke. But I'm wondering if you are just setting me up for attack after attack or do you want to discuss it logically?

One, I think you can write it off as a "mass attack on the American psyche" for WTC 7.
 
Find one CD EXPERT who will agree with you that in a busy, well used, always open building like WTC7, that the rigging of it for CD could have been done without someone noticing...come on...

TAM:)
 
Hi TAM!

your suggested reasons for blowing up WTC7 are not very compelling, and lack any evidence what so ever...this would not even make it to court, let alone have a chance of winning.

TAM:)

Hi Tam! See my post below in great big black letters.
 
Find one CD EXPERT who will agree with you that in a busy, well used, always open building like WTC7, that the rigging of it for CD could have been done without someone noticing...come on...

TAM:)

Day or night?

I'm not aware of the inside layout of the building of course and I don't think you are.

Off topic but...
Hey, did you happen to trace the route of that jet fuel to B-4 in the North Tower?
 
2. What tenets within the building would have access to the resources to plan the rigging and to carry out the rigging of the building?

3. Is there a historical record of similar tenets ...

4. Which tenets would have access...

5. Which tenet would most likely hire foreign operatives...

6. Which tenet could have the investigation limited...

Is this meant to be a not-so-subtle reference to the ex-director of the CIA, or do you have a rogue spellchecker? Perhaps one that checks the text for conspiracy references and adds them when needed.
 
Swing, please learn to use the quote function properly.OK, so you are not being serious about it and 9/11 is a big freaking joke to you.

Now wait just a minute. The Lizard issue is things I've seen in response to truthers who post here. Excuse me for thinking you are a debunker 'just asking questions'.
 
I am constantly amused by the truthers mentioning the CIA had an office there. As if they would be so motivated to blow up their own building. What, they didn't like the break room or something and couldn't get out of the lease?
 
Is this meant to be a not-so-subtle reference to the ex-director of the CIA, or do you have a rogue spellchecker? Perhaps one that checks the text for conspiracy references and adds them when needed.

I will let the conspirator inside of you answer that one.
 
Heck, who says it had to be in New York at all? Coulda been the Sears Tower, or Mount Rushmore, or any other monument or tall building. Why WTC7?
 

Back
Top Bottom