What more Microbes can effect?

[PixyMisa]

Science research in thier home as per its guidelines and base accordingly. Let homeopaths research in their home as per their guidelines and base accordingly.

The problem with that idea is that homeopaths are incompetent researchers. They will never come to an understanding of whether or how homeopathy works using their current methods.

For Truth, valid for everyone, both may need to present "absolute and final" outcome, alike universtal truth. Till that everything on both sides, can be "as yet or as per current understandings etc." Whether science is "absolute and final" in whatever it has yet understood?

When it comes to homeopathy, science is close enough to "absolute and final" for any practical purpose.

Homeopathy is fraud.

In practical observations and experiances, homeopaths find and say differently.

They are wrong.

Science has gone through a slow process of refinement over the past few centuries to solve the sort of problems that are derailing homeopathic research today. Scientists have found methods that allow them to produce accurate, reliable experimental results. Homeopaths entirely ignore all of this.

Better, let everyone to live in their home asnd don't throw stones on each other by living in glass houses. Things are under process, both sides. Few gone with unclarities, new one can come.

Homeopathy doesn't do anything, Kumar. No ifs, buts, or maybes. The only positive results come from incompetent researchers.

 

[Kumar]

Pixy,

You are right, whatever you have read, they may or may not be right for whatever they are experiancing. But one thing is quite clear that there is no mushrooming of any intentional fraud. In view of unclarities, serious and fatal cases are rarely taken so even if people are cured by placebo for regular disorders, they are still benefitting by lesser expences and avoiding unrequired side/adverse effects.

 

[Jeff Corey]

Pixy,
But one thing is quite clear that there is no mushrooming of any intentional fraud. .

Wrong. You might be naive enough to believe this load of sacred cow feces which mushrooms grow on, but other people from near your area aren't. Check out the Rationalist International, based in India.

 

[Kumar]

Wrong. You might be naive enough to believe this load of sacred cow feces which mushrooms grow on, but other people from near your area aren't. Check out the Rationalist International, based in India.

Personal choices based on liking disliking, theories and practicals, observations and experiances can be there. If emergencies and serious issues are not a concern, they are not looser even by placebo, saving money and not acquiring adversities.

 

[PixyMisa]

Personal choices based on liking disliking, theories and practicals, observations and experiances can be there. If emergencies and serious issues are not a concern, they are not looser even by placebo, saving money and not acquiring adversities.

Sure.

That's exactly what we are saying: Homeopathy doesn't do anything.

 

[Kumar]

Sure.

That's exactly what we are saying: Homeopathy doesn't do anything.

Right, as you or you type people feel/find.

 

[Zep]

Right, as you or you type people feel/find.

No, as the FACTS and EVIDENCE find.

It would not matter if everyone here was in complete agreement with you or not. It would not matter if everyone here thought homeopathy was wonderful. The FACTS and EVIDENCE are that homeopathy does not work.

 

[Kumar]

No, as the FACTS and EVIDENCE find.

It would not matter if everyone here was in complete agreement with you or not. It would not matter if everyone here thought homeopathy was wonderful. The FACTS and EVIDENCE are that homeopathy does not work.

Ok, as you feel/find, ought to be right here.

 

[Kumar]

About "Energy beings", I am imagining two types;

1. Energy Entities: Those who can be an association or concentration of energies, somewhat alike a spectrum, individually or specific to specific things or beings from which it is reflected or emitted. This may depend on, whether an association or/and concentration of energies can persist?

2. Energy Microbes: Those microbes which may be carrying our informations either by taking/interacting with our reflected or emitted spectrum/s or by ingesting our DNA, cells or dead skin particles, modifying, multiplying, colonising and somewhat expressing specifically to specific thing or being.

I am just imaginin, rest you can evaluate either from 1% knowledge or possibilty from 99% incoming knowledge. Best luck.

 

[cyborg]

I am imagining two types;

Yes you are. If only you would take sometime to think about what you are saying.

 

[PixyMisa]

About "Energy beings", I am imagining two types;

Kumar, this is utter nonsense, even by the your low standards.

 

[Mashuna]

I am just imaginin, rest you can evaluate either from 1% knowledge or possibilty from 99% incoming knowledge. Best luck.

Kumar, you know that '99%incoming knowledge' doesn't mean you can invent anything you like and it's 99% sure to be true, don't you?

 

[Kumar]

New sense can come from non-sense, You have to just delete "non"--negitivity.

99% is an prominient figure. Anything can be possible. One can try anything or everything to make para-normal as normal.

 

[MRC_Hans]

I somewhere had mentioned that "Dr Hahn. & Dr.Sch.(you can take other reputed scientists also Newtons etc.) thought differently and dynamically so got differently and dynamically". Look at my Sign. This can be the basis of new understandings. I know, I am wondering in jungles, but cities are already serched to maximum. We can't/may not get new knowledges/understandings in cities.

Dr. Hahnemann and Dr. Schuessler were not reputed scientists. They were quacks. They can be excused because the scientific method was not well developed in their era, but their dynamic thoughts letthem astray.

And, Kumar, I have told you this before: You are not wandering in the jungle looking for gems. It may look like a jungle to you because you understand so little, but you are in the city. You are not finding gems, you are picking up old newspapers and discarded gum wrappers and you are imagining that you are thinking dynamically. In fact, you are not thinking at all.

Hans

 

[cyborg]

New sense can come from non-sense, You have to just delete "non"--negitivity.

Nope. It doesn't work like that. Symbols don't magically attain more meaning if you cut bits off them.

99% is an prominient figure.

1 is a stick figure.

0 is a round figure.

100% is a stick round round round stick round figure.

And my sentence is just as meaningful as yours.

 

[Kumar]

Dr. Hahnemann and Dr. Schuessler were not reputed scientists. They were quacks. They can be excused because the scientific method was not well developed in their era, but their dynamic thoughts letthem astray.

And, Kumar, I have told you this before: You are not wandering in the jungle looking for gems. It may look like a jungle to you because you understand so little, but you are in the city. You are not finding gems, you are picking up old newspapers and discarded gum wrappers and you are imagining that you are thinking dynamically. In fact, you are not thinking at all.

Hans

Whatever. People in mass follow them since long back and experianced much positivites. To comment on such introducer, one may has to EQUAL them in other fields. One who can't do anything or don't want to do, may not be entitled to stop others done or doing. Quacks: they were well qualified MD.

 

[Kumar]

Kumar, you know that '99%incoming knowledge' doesn't mean you can invent anything you like and it's 99% sure to be true, don't you?

It may also not mean that investment on just 1% or on aspects which are not yet become "absolute and final" may land into wrong investment, ultimately.

 

[Kumar]

Nope. It doesn't work like that. Symbols don't magically attain more meaning if you cut bits off them.



1 is a stick figure.

0 is a round figure.

100% is a stick round round round stick round figure.

And my sentence is just as meaningful as yours.

0 is energetic. Remove two 00 and see the result. It is hundred because you used energy(zero mass, zero temp. even absolute zero, all still energetic) on right(positive) side, if on left(negative) side, it will still remain same 001.

 

[cyborg]

0 is energetic.

0 is fat and lazy.

Remove two 00 and see the result.

Remove and.

It is hundred because you used energy

It is stick round round. I don't understand this 'hundred' you speak of.

(zero mass, zero temp. even absolute zero, all still energetic)

No, lazy.

on right(positive) side, if on left(negative) side, it will still remain same 001.

On up (fat) side, if on down (lazy) side, it will remain round round stick.

 

[Kumar]

0 is fat and lazy.



Remove and.



It is stick round round. I don't understand this 'hundred' you speak of.



No, lazy.



On up (fat) side, if on down (lazy) side, it will remain round round stick.

No Fats and lazy are much bigger than 0. There is a hole in zero. You can go deep and deep into it.