• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change Final Cut premiering in.. Norway?

ref said:
Based on the review on LCF, this movie doesn't offer much new and has already been debunked. 11 signs of CD, Pentagon stuff, flight 93, WTC7, Steven Jones, Gordon Ross, old TV clips.

Only new material seems to be new animations and some new NORAD tapes analysis, maybe something more on Able Danger.
Click to expand...
Note the absence of Kevin Ryan and William Rodriguez.
 
ref said:
Only new material seems to be new animations and some new NORAD tapes analysis, maybe something more on Able Danger.
Click to expand...
Dylan did say that the new film would be undebunkable, but if it's the same old recycled arguments, what a load of <rule 8>, or was it <10>?
 
The same reviewer later adds,

"There were many people in the movie theatre that didnt belive that 9/11 was an inside job. They didnt change their mind after the movie. Final Cut is a movie that proofs that the official story we are given is a lie, not that it was an inside job."

(bolding mine)
 
Calcas said:
The same reviewer later adds,

"There were many people in the movie theatre that didnt belive that 9/11 was an inside job. They didnt change their mind after the movie. Final Cut is a movie that proofs that the official story we are given is a lie, not that it was an inside job."

(bolding mine)
Click to expand...
LIHOP at best?
 
And that is the rub of it. Dylan has realized that the MIHOP is a dead duck, and that the only way to hang on to any sense of longevity, and any hopes of attracting a larger audience, is the path of "press for truth". He just like to flirt a little more with the MIHOP arguements than the Jersey Girls do.

TAM:)
 
It can not be a LIHOP, if they are talking about the controlled demolition. And they are.
 
~enigma~ said:
DId you see this post?
Click to expand...

So ok. They have Steven Jones talking about 11 signs of controlled demolition, but the movie does not take a stand. They have people talking about explosions on the towers, but the movie does not take a stand nor explain these explosions.

It sounds like a MIHOP movie in disguise then, they are saying people say this, but they don't take a stand themselves. Because I really doubt they are offering a counter argument to Steven Jones and his 11 sign hypothesis.
 
I think my opinion on 9/11, is that we have not been given the entire truth, and likely never will, but that the overall jist of the story, including who did it, why they did it, and how they did it...is essentially as we have been told.

TAM:)
 
ref said:
So ok. They have Steven Jones talking about 11 signs of controlled demolition, but the movie does not take a stand. They have people talking about explosions on WTC7, but the movie does not take a stand.

It sounds like a MIHOP movie in disguise then, they are saying people say this, but they don't take a stand themselves. Because I really doubt they are offering a counter argument to Steven Jones and his 11 sign hypothesis.
Click to expand...

Dylan is hedging his bets. I think he loves the MIHOP arguements, but I do not think he really believes them. He also knows, after a few years in this thing, that they are not going to fly with a wider audience...but LIHOP/LIHOI might.

TAM:)
 
ref said:
So ok. They have Steven Jones talking about 11 signs of controlled demolition, but the movie does not take a stand. They have people talking about explosions on the towers, but the movie does not take a stand nor explain these explosions.

It sounds like a MIHOP movie in disguise then, they are saying people say this, but they don't take a stand themselves. Because I really doubt they are offering a counter argument to Steven Jones and his 11 sign hypothesis.
Click to expand...
Ok...whatever although with two differing thoughts I figured some people would be inclined to wait before jumping to conclusions that may be wrng.
 
Does it have Norwegian subtitles?

(Like the opening credits of Monty Python & The Holy Grail?)

((okay, I realize that was Swedish, but I understand they have moose in Norway too!))
 
~enigma~ said:
Ok...whatever although with two differing thoughts I figured some people would be inclined to wait before jumping to conclusions that may be wrng.
Click to expand...

Of course I wait for the movie. These conclusions are based on the info we have thus far. He has said he will include CD in the movie. That to me is MIHOP no matter how you put it. But I will wait and see before the final judgment.
 
ref said:
Of course I wait for the movie. These conclusions are based on the info we have thus far. He has said he will include CD in the movie. That to me is MIHOP no matter how you put it. But I will wait and see before the final judgment.
Click to expand...
There are two entirely different statements about LC:FC made by someone who has seen the movie. So the info you have is conflicting and a conclusion can't be based off that. Why don't you look at the rest of the review? Do you want LC:FC to be MIHOP? If you prefer to go on and make an assumption based on two different thoughts, you are free to do so but don't complain if you end up wiping egg off your face. What is it they say about assumptions?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom