Time to kick Iran

So, maybe you were mistaken, when you spoke about this " Le Galois "?
Please, tell me..
No.

Just streamline.

There is nothing wrong with Poincare.
So, do we agree that, we have a reason why we do not find so many American mathematician in classical engineering books?
Yeah.

Low standards.
I did not know that " displaying obesity " had anything to do with being a good scientist ( or not )
It has to do with standards.

To be obese it to be unhygienic, stupid and obscene.
Virtually, started many, if not all, the hi-tech industries of today?
Not mathematics.
...
I do have the suspicion that Ion can be just a cunny troll..
But you are a troll and a brown noser to U.S..
 
Last edited:
Another important American mathematician..

Carl Pomerance

Carl Pomerance (born in 1944 in Joplin, Missouri) is a well known number theorist. He attended college at Brown University and later received his PhD from Harvard University in 1972 for his study that any odd perfect number N has at least 7 distinct prime factors. He immediately joined the faculty at the University of Georgia, becoming full professor in 1982. He subsequently worked at Lucent Technologies for a number of years, and then became a Distinguished Professor at Dartmouth College.

He has won many teaching and research awards, including the Chauvenet Prize in 1985, MAA's distinguished university teaching award in 1997, and the Conant Prize in 2001. He has over 120 publications to his credit, including co-authorship with R. Crandall of Prime numbers: a computational perspective, Springer-Verlag, 2001, 2005. He is the inventor of one of the most important factorisation methods, the quadratic sieve algorithm, which was used in 1994 for the factorisation of RSA-129. He is also one of the discoverers of the Adleman-Pomerance-Rumely primality test.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Pomerance
Good find.

But spring is not made with one flower.

The newspaper quotes I produced show a profound low level in education in U.S. compared to Europe.
 
Good find.

But spring is nat made with one flower.

If you have time, I can give you other examples..
BTW, how many flowers do you need to make a spring?

By the way..
Sorry to insist, but..
Who was that " Le Galois "??
 
Is that R. as in Richard? If so, I know the guy. Took a class by him once.

Do not know..
I came to know him, because he was quoted by a Canadian guy, who is trying to build the first world quantum computer..
I just found the quote in Wikipedia, where there is a list of 600+ Americanmathematicians, there..
 
If you have time, I can give you other examples..
BTW, how many flowers do you need to make a spring?
...
Millions.

Looks like the topics I brought up about mathematics (Group in Algebra, Topology, etc.) they are delicacies in U.S..

In France they are the norm.

Mathematiques Superieures, the first post secondary year, teaches them to thousands, as a standard, free of charge.

Evolution is accepted by less than 70% in U.S., but is accepted by more than 80% in Western Europe.

U.S. has long ways to go, to play catch up.
...
By the way..
Sorry to insist, but..
Who was that " Le Galois "??
What's wrong with Poincare?
 
Last edited:
So, I need to give you the name of millions of American mathematicians?
...
Absolutely.

Not just geniuses like Poincare (France) and Pomerance (U.S.), but U.S. people who know off the top of their head what's cos(a+b), what's a Dirac function, how to solve Ricatti differential equations,

as opposed to cows who babble on cell phones developed in U.S. by educated, exploited immigrants.

That would show more enlightenment and education in U.S. than the usual broken record of stale Capitalism, wars (Iraq, Iran in waiting), and religion.
 
Last edited:
Then how come you don't know mathematics?

Your presumptions of my ignorance aside, you're still the one who can't even figure out what topology is, and why the metric of a manifold is part of its geometry and not its topology. Don't blame me for your stupidity.
 
Suuure.

Spoken like a U.S. lawyer.

In other words, you have no substantive response to being proven wrong. And since your only attempt at demonstrating that Poincare's contribution to special relativity was through topology turned out to be a paper which actually disproved your claim, you're afraid to try again for fear of looking like an even bigger idiot. Well, have no fear on that front, Ion. You look as dumb as it is possible to look.
 
Speak mathematics, will you?

I have, and you never responded. Do you know what a manifold is? Do you know what a metric is? Do you know why a metric is part of the geometry of a manifold, and not a part of its topology? Those are all math questions, and they have gone unanswered by you. Because you don't actually know the answers to them, and you're hoping that nobody will notice that your ignorance demonstrates that you aren't nearly as math-savy as you like to pretend. And unlike some of your math questions, they aren't random either: they go to the heart of claims you made, and the answers to them demonstrate why you were completely wrong.
 
Matteo Martini said:
So, I need to give you the name of millions of American mathematicians?

Absolutely.

Not just geniuses like Poincare (France) and Pomerance (U.S.), but U.S. people who know off the top of their head what's cos(a+b), what's a Dirac function, how to solve Ricatti differential equations,

Would you give me the names of millions of French and Romanians, who know off the top of their head what's cos(a+b), what's a Dirac function, how to solve Ricatti differential equations?

BTW, for the last time, waiting for an answer about " Le Galois "..
 
Would you give me the names of millions of French and Romanians, who know off the top of their head what's cos(a+b), what's a Dirac function, how to solve Ricatti differential equations?

The funny thing is, I doubt Ion really even understands Dirac functions (ie, delta functions) on anything deeper than a superficial level. He probably doesn't understand that they are not in fact actually functions at all.

BTW, for the last time, waiting for an answer about " Le Galois "..

Why would he answer now? He might have to admit that "Le Galois" is really Evariste Galois. And that would make him feel bad. And we can't have that, can we?
 
Would you give me the names of millions of French and Romanians, who know off the top of their head what's cos(a+b), what's a Dirac function, how to solve Ricatti differential equations?

BTW, for the last time, waiting for an answer about " Le Galois "..
Sure.

Start with the telephone book.

When more than 80% of Europeans believe in evolution, and less than 70% of Americans believe in evolution, when most industrialized countries in the world beat U.S. in scientific tests (and I posted excerpts from the article), then:

pretty much anyone in the telephone book in foreign countries is better than the Americans.

Think this way:

for every immigrant U.S. uses in high-tech at 6 figures salary per year, an American didn't get educated.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom