So who removed the blood between the time Flight 93 took off, and their body parts were found at the crash scene? After all, the body parts found were matched to passengers on flight 93 right?
Um, so how many airline crashes did the coroner investigate prior to 9/11?
And all of that debris was found in the direction in which the plane was travelling. Not spread for miles in the direction from which it came. Learn something about explosives and aircraft before you sit on a petard with a torch in your hand.
Do you realize what happened when you damage the fuselage of a pressurized aircraft? Or what happens to it when it rams into a solid surface? The skin comes of rather explosively sometimes. It doesn't even take a lot of damage for a pressurized fuselage to fail at speed.
Also, there was enough of the aircraft in tact at the scene to punch an airplane-shaped hole in the ground, complete with the tail print. And, considering that it hit up-side down, it is remarkable that EITHER engine was found in association with the wings.
Please explain the gag orders on Johnstown ATC & Westmoreland County 911.
And when you can positively identify the type of plane witnessed by Susan McElwain, Dale Browning, Susan Custer, Jim Brandt, Tom Spinelli, John Fleegle, plus some unpublished accounts who confirm a F20 Falcon was not the white plane and nowhere near then you can tell me what is capable of doing what to a plane.
I tell you what TC...I am willing to bet money that if they found body parts, they found blood. As to what he meant by his comments, only he can straighten out. I am a physician, and I can tell you where there are parts, there is blood. Even if all, I mean all, the skin and muscle and vessels was torn away, the marrow would contain some blood within the bone.
Sorry...where there are body parts, there is blood...EOS.
TAM![]()
SO please provide us with the evidence/parts/debris collection list from the FBi that you certainly MUST HAVE to make such a definitive statement.
oh wait, I am sure you don't have one, so you must be...wait for it...wait for it....speculating/exaggerating/tall tale telling when you say the above...right?
TAM![]()
Listen I believe they found blood. From my 11 months of traveling back and forth meeting published and unpublished witnesses I believe they found blood. I don't believe they found any blood anywhere near the Shanksville debris field though. Can't seem to find anyone out there that confirms that.
Please explain the gag orders on Johnstown ATC & Westmoreland County 911.
I'm getting really tired of JREF insulting the good people of Shanksville....seriously.
What precisely did you say to them and what precisely did they say to you?
1)What type of plane did they identify it as?
2)Did you show them pictures? 3)Did the pictures include the Falcon?
4)Did any of the pictures you showed to the witnesses accurately represent the craft at the altitude and distance they saw it?
5)Did you push a particular picture of a particular plane at the witnesses? 6)Did ya?
Why do you assume that all witnesses would be willing to talk to you? You're (as far as 911 and any investigation goes) a nobody. You don't have any accreditation with news media or law enforcement, so why do you think people should talk to you? I certainly wouldn't.
Charles Sturtz isn't willing to talk to me because of his agreement with Val McClatchey concerning her new 'book'. So not all witnesses are.
These people are good everyday people. As much as you hate to hear it, so am I. To date only 1 person wouldn't talk to me and I just named the individual and the reason why. I even plan on contacting Val herself.
I am honest. The people in Shanksville are honest. I don't "push" theories. I ask them questions. They're willing to share their stories. At first some aren't until I tell them about other people I spoken with. When I start talking about the stuff you people ridicule me for talking about it seems to help other eyewitnesses open right up to me. Odd...........
Your free to not believe me.
Please reproduce here the picture they identified1) Repeatedly "looks like the global hawk pic but the tail section is different."
Did you explore the possibility that the plane was higher and therefore could have been larger but with fewer features identifiable from their vantage point?2) Yes
3) Yes
4) Considering all witnesses put it at no higher than 40' before taking off I would say the pics of the planes are fair.
Anything other than the Falcon, huh?5) Absolutely not. I in fact was expecting to be told it was an A10 Warthog because of disinfo pushed by AFP.
6) Absoultey not, again........![]()
How do you think the residents of shanksville would feel if they knew that you were using their words to accuse innocent people of murder, accusing FBi agents of covering up this murder?
TAM![]()