SpaceMonkeyZero
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2007
- Messages
- 1,284
Vampires![]()
Shadowy Government Reverse Vampires (They did their work in daylight after all)
Vampires![]()
I have been having a discussion about flight 93 on another forum. As ever the out of context quote was made about no blood and no plane. I explained that they couldn't see plane bodies or blood because the plane had buried itself into the ground.
They have now come back and said i am contradicting the 911 report because it doesnt say that. Was i wrong?
TC:
So which is it...a passenger plane shot down, or no passenger plane at all, make up your mind already.
Warner:
Disregard most of what TC has to say unless he backs it up with links to reputable sources.
TAM![]()
amazing that he could find BODY PARTS from the victims in the adjacent area, but not see any blood...I guess these body parts had ALL THE BLOOD REMOVED FROM THEM!!
OMG, what ridiculousness
TAM![]()
Naturally I don't believe anything this Administration (much like the previous 3) has to say.
So....Flight 93 crashed then? Or no plane crashed and the gov scattered body parts all over the place? What exactly is your theory?
What kind of debris? And who'd you talk to?
Only
paper and light metal were found at Shanksville? Don't recall making that point.
Obviously a shoot-down that selectively removed the blood from the passengers...
If it hadn't taken place in full daylight, I'd be forced to accept the vampire theory as superior to yours, ErrorCell. That puts you in, let's see... ah, here it is: Last Place.
1) I disagree, and I'm not lying. Two engines were found. One in the crater, one in a pond a few hundred meters away. Both heavily damaged.
2)So who shot it down? 3)With what ordnance? 4)Why does the FDR indicate no damage up to the point of impact? 5)Why are there no secondary debris fields? 6)Why are you still here?
Yes one engine was recovered about 5 feet deep in the ground because it was still attached at impact. A 2nd engine was recovered over a thousand feet away. It did not 'bounce'.
2)USAF
3) Don't know
4) Why does AA77 FDR indicate it didn't hit the street poles?
5) There are 3 debris fields - Shanksville, Indian Lake, & New Baltimore
6) I don't break the TOS and I get a kick out of randomly slapping Bush Nazi's around.
![]()
Call Wally Miller and tell him how ridiculous that is. Mark will give his number.
![]()
...
If it hadn't taken place in full daylight, I'd be forced to accept the vampire theory as superior to yours, ErrorCell. That puts you in, let's see... ah, here it is: Last Place.
"UA93" was completely destroyed. It was shot down.
The same kind of debris found adjacent to the crater in the wooded area spread out for 4 miles.
And 1 engine. If you disagree then you're lying.
P.S. only paper and slight scraps of metal were found at Shanksville. Whats your point?
1) Didn't have to. It continued in the original direction of travel. The aircraft's roll angle suggests that one engine hit ground first and plowed, while the other was raised above the fuselage. Gee, how suspicious. I also like how "almost a mile" has become "a thousand feet." Want to try for even more accuracy, liar?
2) Sure they did.
3) They only way for an AAM to take out a large aircraft is either through (a) destroying control surfaces, (b) destroying an engine, (c) killing the pilots, or (d) gross structural breakup. (a) through (c) are precluded by FDR records of correct function and pilot inputs up until impact. (d) is precluded by the non-existence of secondary debris fields and the continued function of the FDR at all. You lose.
You deny Indian Lake & New Baltimore debris fields and call me a liar???4) It does no such thing. Stop lying, if you even know how.
5) There are not. Blowing paper post-impact is not a separate debris field.
6) If I see any, I'll give you a call, tough guy.
7) Why even bring up the "no blood" comment, if you have no explanation for it? Doesn't that suggest you have a problem?
Sheesh.
Come on TC, the vampire theory was MINE.