• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

An email from a Conspiracy theorist, and I have no idea how

no facts, just talk, this is so easy

Heiwa said:
This is your opinion (A) and also US policy. My opinion (B) is that the damages were caused by explosive device(s) in the pentagon E-wall.

It is a pity FBI didn't investigate (B). Shouldn't have been too difficult.
Click to expand...
Flight 77 did all the damage to the building, then the fires destroyed more. Sorry you have no facts.. I have all the facts. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon going over 473KIAS, you do not have a clue. Flight 77 going fast enough to create the damage of a 2000 pound bomb due to KE. Something you never studied. Your opinion is wrong, my facts are correct.

Facts vs. Opinion, oops you lost. Darn, nice try but next time come with facts. Learn physics, and stop posting opinions at a facts needed affair.
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
Flight 77 did all the damage to the building, then the fires destroyed more. Sorry you have no facts.. I have all the facts. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon going over 473KIAS, you do not have a clue. Flight 77 going fast enough to create the damage of a 2000 pound bomb due to KE. Something you never studied. Your opinion is wrong, my facts are correct.

Facts vs. Opinion, oops you lost. Darn, nice try but next time come with facts. Learn physics, and stop posting opinions at a facts needed affair.
Click to expand...

Where did you get your facts from? The tooth fairy? Father Christmas? You are a fantastic source of information.

BTW who taught you physics? A football coach?
 
no facts, a perfect record

Heiwa said:
Here are some 9/11 witnesses:
http://www.netsummary.dk/2007/05/americans-are-not-stupid.php?m=l
Click to expand...
So you are now officially an American, I decree you are as these people are, but your expertise of terminal stupidity is 9/11. Still no facts. Thanks for showing us your American cousins. I did not know you had so many relatives in the US. Ironic post, you have identified your problem with 9/11, you have no idea, no clue, and no facts.
 
Heiwa said:
Here are some 9/11 witnesses:
Click to expand...

Ah! Well. If you think this counts as evidence I can understand why you never fully understands why we continue to deny your fact -ridden, bullet-proof, well-supported theory.
Question:If the lawsuit you mentioned before clearly states that AA77 hit the Pentagon. FBI, Interpol and the Starfleet federation will bring up hard evidence that this realy was what happenend. You will do what?
1. Lay down you arms.
2. Claim that the evidence is fake, the witnesses are cross-.eyed and not to be trusted, and shout it was an inside job?
 
beachnut said:
So you are now officially an American, I decree you are as these people are, but your expertise of terminal stupidity is 9/11. Still no facts. Thanks for showing us your American cousins. I did not know you had so many relatives in the US. Ironic post, you have identified your problem with 9/11, you have no idea, no clue, and no facts.
Click to expand...

No, the American people shown are not stupid at all. They are all very nice, social and friendly and some young girls are quite qute too, etc. They are good people. But they lack some basic knowledges in various fields. And they are also very easy to deceive. What upsets me is not the good people being interviewed. It is the media guy announcing the report.
 
Last edited:
Zorglub said:
Ah! Well. If you think this counts as evidence I can understand why you never fully understands why we continue to deny your fact -ridden, bullet-proof, well-supported theory.
Question:If the lawsuit you mentioned before clearly states that AA77 hit the Pentagon. FBI, Interpol and the Starfleet federation will bring up hard evidence that this realy was what happenend. You will do what?
1. Lay down you arms.
2. Claim that the evidence is fake, the witnesses are cross-.eyed and not to be trusted, and shout it was an inside job?
Click to expand...

Good questions. If I were the airline companies or plane manufacturers in this case, I would of course deny everything (as they do)! I am innocent until proven otherwise. So the accusing/accused party, FBI and its boss, must prove all their findings that I am a criminal or whatever. Imagine I am the owner of AA77 and it has disappeared. FBI announces it has crashed into pentagon due to my fault, e.g. checking the passengers or not having a crew that can stop some gangsters with carpet cutters. Before even discussing my negligence - checking the passengers/weak crew - FBI must of course show that AA77 crashed into pentagon. Let them do that. So far I haven't seen anything that gives me reason to believe that.

So FBI presents some proof that AA77 actually crashed into pentagon. What do I do? I evidently present some other proof that it was not (because I have plenty). I do not start screaming inside job or other obtusites or lay down my arms (that I do not carry).
 
Heiwa said:
No, the American people shown are not stupid at all. They are all very nice, social and friendly and some young girls are quite qute too, etc. They are good people. But they lack some basic knowledges in various fields. And they are also very easy to deceive. What upsets me is not the good people being interviewed. It is the media guy announcing the report.
Click to expand...
I had a few physics teachers, and when I finished my engineering degree I went to UPT. Then I was invited to get my Masters in Electrical Engineering.

The media guy is making a funny video, you are making errors in judgment about 9/11. You must not be very educated in physics or math. You believe in CT on 9/11. It is not a very intelligent endeavor, and making up lies about 9/11 like you have been is low down, despicable.
 
Heiwa said:
No, the American people shown are not stupid at all. They are all very nice, social and friendly and some young girls are quite qute too, etc. They are good people. But they lack some basic knowledges in various fields. And they are also very easy to deceive. What upsets me is not the good people being interviewed. It is the media guy announcing the report.
Click to expand...

But not you eh?

By the way any chance of a comment in this thread?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89666

For some reason no truther has made a comment yet, maybe you will be the first, you being so smart and not so easily deceived.
 
beachnut said:
I had a few physics teachers, and when I finished my engineering degree I went to UPT. Then I was invited to get my Masters in Electrical Engineering.

The media guy is making a funny video, you are making errors in judgment about 9/11. You must not be very educated in physics or math. You believe in CT on 9/11. It is not a very intelligent endeavor, and making up lies about 9/11 like you have been is low down, despicable.
Click to expand...

Yes, I believe in CD of 9/11 ... of pentagon of all places. And WTC too of course. These gangsters used the same methods in all four places. Kept it simple. And the longer I attend these fora, the more I am convinced. Cannot any clever person prove me wrong?
 
Heiwa said:
No, I got upset about the media announcer. They are very few. And they deceived you, too. The media is the message.:p
Click to expand...

You are saying that the "media announcer" lacked some basic knowledge and was easy to decieve?

That doesn't make sense.
 
Heiwa said:
Good questions. If I were the airline companies or plane manufacturers in this case, I would of course deny everything (as they do)! I am innocent until proven otherwise. So the accusing/accused party, FBI and its boss, must prove all their findings that I am a criminal or whatever. Imagine I am the owner of AA77 and it has disappeared. FBI announces it has crashed into pentagon due to my fault, e.g. checking the passengers or not having a crew that can stop some gangsters with carpet cutters. Before even discussing my negligence - checking the passengers/weak crew - FBI must of course show that AA77 crashed into pentagon. Let them do that. So far I haven't seen anything that gives me reason to believe that.

So FBI presents some proof that AA77 actually crashed into pentagon. What do I do? I evidently present some other proof that it was not (because I have plenty). I do not start screaming inside job or other obtusites or lay down my arms (that I do not carry).
Click to expand...
Basically, what you say is that you will only accept an outcome of this hypotethical trial if it judges in your favour? If it doesn´t it´s even stronger proof that truth are muted by the man? Nice. How come you are the only one that doesn´t see that you are reasoning in tunnel vision. Your rethoric isn´t even rethorical. It´s just blindfolded tunnel vision with one aim in sight.
 
pathetic lies

Heiwa said:
Yes, I believe in CD of 9/11 ... of pentagon of all places. And WTC too of course. These gangsters used the same methods in all four places. Kept it simple. And the longer I attend these fora, the more I am convinced. Cannot any clever person prove me wrong?
Click to expand...
No, you are the one making up stories and since you can not prove them to persist in telling these false statements with no proof makes your statements lies. You have to prove it happened, and since there is no evidence you are wrong. Only uneducated fools believe the statement you make. Why are you making up lies? I see your talk is all you have. Every single piece of evidence is against your ideas. Why make up lies, what is your purpose for telling lies about 9/11? Why?
 
stateofgrace said:
But not you eh?

By the way any chance of a comment in this thread?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89666

For some reason no truther has made a comment yet, maybe you will be the first, you being so smart and not so easily deceived.
Click to expand...

When I opened the thread you had plenty of replies. BTW nobody in Germany or elsewhere in Europe have been sentenced for anything to do with 9/11 as per US policy. Reason? FBI cannot provide any evidence.
 
beachnut said:
No, you are the one making up stories and since you can not prove them to persist in telling these false statements with no proof makes your statements lies. You have to prove it happened, and since there is no evidence you are wrong. Only uneducated fools believe the statement you make. Why are you making up lies? I see your talk is all you have. Every single piece of evidence is against your ideas. Why make up lies, what is your purpose for telling lies about 9/11? Why?
Click to expand...

Calm down. I am not making up anything. We just happen to have different opinions based on the info available. I consider the FBI evidence - all single pieces of it - rubbish because they cannot produce one little bit of AA77 at pentagon. I don't know why you swallow the FBI fairy tale? Policy? And why do you become rude? Uneducated fools? You discuss with those?:eye-poppi
 
Zorglub said:
Basically, what you say is that you will only accept an outcome of this hypotethical trial if it judges in your favour? If it doesn´t it´s even stronger proof that truth are muted by the man? Nice. How come you are the only one that doesn´t see that you are reasoning in tunnel vision. Your rethoric isn´t even rethorical. It´s just blindfolded tunnel vision with one aim in sight.
Click to expand...

Of course I like to have the case heard in court. That's were it belongs. But I always recommend a proper criminal investigation beforehand to establish the facts. And we have not arrived there yet. :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom