peer review.

~enigma~ said:
Damn, that hit so hard it even hurt me :)
Click to expand...

Oops. Sorry about that - it happens sometimes if you don't stand away from the uncontrolled loons swinging in the breeze in time... I should have warned you ;)
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
All money, little or a lot, should be justified with evidence of a need. I don't see it, nor do others here...but it is not us you have to convince, despite the truth movement spending so much time trying to do so.

TAM;)
Click to expand...

The calls for a new investigation are almost always insincere and unspecific. If the government is the perpetrator, how can a government investigation be trusted?

The parameters for such an investigation are never clear or explicit. That's inevitable. If an investigation were to be put together, it would be rejected immediately by some conspiracists, and it would be rejected by all of them when its conclusions were published.

There have been numerous independent investigations into 911, and all of the serious ones have demolished the conspiracy theories. That only serves to discredit the investigations in the eyes of those wedded to their pet theories.

Personally I'd favour a detailed investigation into the important issues which the conspiracists have clouded over.
 
westprog said:
The calls for a new investigation are almost always insincere and unspecific. If the government is the perpetrator, how can a government investigation be trusted?

The parameters for such an investigation are never clear or explicit. That's inevitable. If an investigation were to be put together, it would be rejected immediately by some conspiracists, and it would be rejected by all of them when its conclusions were published.

There have been numerous independent investigations into 911, and all of the serious ones have demolished the conspiracy theories. That only serves to discredit the investigations in the eyes of those wedded to their pet theories.

Personally I'd favour a detailed investigation into the important issues which the conspiracists have clouded over.
Click to expand...

Can you elaborate on what those issues might be.
 
Gravy said:
Except that when the video is slowed down and stabilized, JFK's head clearly moves forward at impact, before rebounding to the rear.

Is there anything you do know about?
Click to expand...

Are the witnesses who saw bullet holes in the limousine windshield lying? Yes or no?

"The presidential limousine, which had a bullet hole in the windshield, witnessed by two Dallas police officers, Sergeant Stavis Ellis and Patrolman H.R. Freeman, who saw it in the parking lot of the emergency room at Parkland, and by journalist Richard Dudman--made by a bullet from the front...noted the hole 'just left of center' in the windshield" According to Ellis, it was not chipped glass at Parkland he saw. 'You could put a pencil through it.'"
Click to expand...


Killzone, by Craig Roberts
 
realcddeal said:
And you haven't shown us any calculations so how can you say I don't understand gravity.

I just have a suspicion that I understand what F=ma means, what impulsive loads are, what buckling is, and mechanics in general, a whole lot better than you. However, you are welcome to show me that hunch is wrong.

I was talking to TAM concerning agreeing to disagree. You might have thought it was you due to your similar handles.
Click to expand...

You just have a suspicion I have knowledge.

You are talking on an open forum so anyone can reply.

Do not show the pearls to the swine.
 
uk_dave said:
I wonder how the insurance companies view buildings which have pre-planted explosives?

Oh wait, sorry, the Insurance companies are in on it too!! Silly me.

As were the original builders, in fact every contractor in the NYC area who might at some point be asked to carry out alterations or undertake repairs must also be part of the conspiracy.

That would apply to the NYC utility companies also

Then, of course, the companies renting space within the building. They'd have to be tipped the wink about not letting their people get too....excited close to the positions of the preplanted charges...you know, just in case of premature explosion.

I'm beginning to wonder: Apart from a handful of 'truthers', is there anyone in the world who is NOT in on the conspiracy?
Click to expand...

Everybody is in on it but us.

I'm feeling left out.

How do we get into it?
 
Last edited:
Revolutionary91 said:
Right. So two policemen, a journalist and a doctor in another account are all lying because what they say doesnt fit what you believe. Your a great skeptic!
Click to expand...

Yes I am a great skeptic. Thanks for the recognition.

They are not lying you are just not trying to understand.

How many uniforms does it take to make it true?
 
Revolutionary91 said:
Make your mind up. Are they lying or not?
Click to expand...

False dilemma. Are they mistaken? There was certainly a crack in the windshield - did they check for themselves whether it was a bullet hole? Did they hear about it from someone else who may have mistakenly embellished their account? Have they been misreported?

The world isn't as black-and-white as conspiracy theorists want it to be.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
False dilemma. Are they mistaken? There was certainly a crack in the windshield - did they check for themselves whether it was a bullet hole? Did they hear about it from someone else who may have mistakenly embellished their account? Have they been misreported?

The world isn't as black-and-white as conspiracy theorists want it to be.

Dave
Click to expand...

What part of According to Ellis, it was not chipped glass at Parkland he saw. 'You could put a pencil through it.'" didnt you understand?

Why do you never ask those questions of witnesses that support the official story?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom