'News' International has no truck for quality journalism, as far as I can tell.
He owns The Times, The Sunday Times and The Australian among other papers.
Does Conspiraider actually read the Wall Street Journal?
'News' International has no truck for quality journalism, as far as I can tell.
I didn't know there was media democracy. I don't even know what that is.
Oliver,
Define Monopoly.
Monopoly in the Media-System:This concentration has been encouraged by government deregulation and neo-liberal trade policies. For example, the U.S. Telecommunications Act of 1996 discarded most media ownership rules that were previously in place, leading to massive consolidation in the telecommunications industry. Over 4,000 radio stations were bought out, and minority ownership of TV stations dropped to its lowest point since the federal government began tracking such data in 1990. [2] In its review of the Telecommunication Act in 2003, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) further reduced restrictions and allowed media corporations to grow and expand into other areas of media.
Source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_democracy#Media_ownership_concentration
A monopoly (from the Greek language monos, one + polein, to sell) is defined as a persistent market situation where there is only one provider of a product or service, in other words a firm that has no competitors in its industry. Monopolies are characterized by a lack of economic competition for the good or service that they provide and a lack of viable substitute goods. [1]
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly
Is Rupert Murdoch the only media owner in the US?
I tend to get all my news from the internet anyway.
I am fully aware of Rupert Murdoch's assets.
Why ask a question about Rupert Murdoch's monopoly if you know that there is no such thing.
Many of those assets you list are actually British, Australian or not even media assets.
I don't think there's too much of a threat of internet censorship. It's just not in any company's best interests. I mean for example if a local provider here started cutting off access or redirecting people from sites they actually wanted to visit, it wouldn't take long for that provider to find itself with a lot less customers.
I didn't know Dow Jones was a guy. Huh, go figure.The megalomaniac has succeeded:
http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=media&storyID=nWEN9896
Put this guy on the street. Drop all purchasing of the WSJ.
Are you on Myspace? Get off of there. He owns that too.
Or you can continue to funnel money to this out-of-control megalomaniac.
Folks - You just know that things are terribly wrong on this planet when this much power is handed over to one disgustingly putrid megalomaniac. That is undeniable.
The megalomaniac has succeeded:
http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=media&storyID=nWEN9896
Put this guy on the street. Drop all purchasing of the WSJ.
Are you on Myspace? Get off of there. He owns that too.
Or you can continue to funnel money to this out-of-control megalomaniac.
Folks - You just know that things are terribly wrong on this planet when this much power is handed over to one disgustingly putrid megalomaniac. That is undeniable.
ConspiRaider does not.He owns The Times, The Sunday Times and The Australian among other papers.
Does Conspiraider actually read the Wall Street Journal?
What makes you imply he isn't?What makes you say he's a megalomaniac, btw?