niveus purgamentum ?

Hardly reductio and absurdum. The refuting of a proposition by the disclosure of the absurdity of the conclusion if taken to it's logical end.

Please keep your Latin to yourself . . . unless you are serious. :p
 
I've never kissed a girl but I'm on the 13th level of Mutants and Masterminds.

Check mate.

You're making me crave the San Diego Comic Con and it's only a couple of miles away. It's just a nerd prom though.
 
Thanks, but I know what it means, although I don't have a clue why you think I am arguing it.

P.S. ad !

I just don't know that Latin term. Technichally, I only have 5 units of Spanish . . . even though I learned a lot in Honduras and talking to people here in California.

I said your response wasn't reductio and absurdum because the discussion had stopped at that point, basically!!! Lol!!!
 
I just don't know that Latin term. Technichally, I only have 5 units of Spanish . . . even though I learned a lot in Honduras and talking to people here in California.

I said your response wasn't reductio and absurdum because the discussion had stopped at that point, basically!!! Lol!!!
AD ! AD! Reductio AD absurdum. It is latin !

The term means 'White trash'. You were looking for a primitive group of people.
 
AD ! AD! Reductio AD absurdum. It is latin !

The term means 'White trash'. You were looking for a primitive group of people.

I suppose. We're all "trash" since we're cavemen. Our brains haven't changed since we've been in the caves, and our brain waves are exactly the same when we are spacing out watching telivision as when we are watching a fire . .. which our primitive ancestors had.

They had plenty of fire, music, and stories. They had it all.

EDIT: And, of course, burned meat.
 
Of course there will be Pierce-bashing from the members on this forum, but you are not the only ones who read the threads here. Dr. William L. Pierce will be well remembered years after we are all gone. If just one person becomes racially aware by posting this thread then it will all have been worth it.

Could you explain what you actually mean by this?

What do you think about racial mixing? If my friend had one dark-skinned parent and one white parent, but otherwise shares the same culture and upbringing as me, does she qualify as white enough to live in Whiteyville?

Is it just the gangster/rapper style blacks we want to keep out?


No?
 
Take a biology class. You'll then learn what happenes when parents with different blood types have kids.

They each donate one of their two ABO alleles to the child, determining the child’s blood type which will be different from at least one of the parents, possibly both. This does not result in “poisoning”, although it may mean that one or other of the parents would not be a suitable blood donor for their child.

What do you think happens?

Do you know what a placenta is?

Can you guess why I ask?
 
They each donate one of their two ABO alleles to the child, determining the child’s blood type which will be different from at least one of the parents, possibly both. This does not result in “poisoning”, although it may mean that one or other of the parents would not be a suitable blood donor for their child.

What do you think happens?

Do you know what a placenta is?

Can you guess why I ask?

It has to do with the mother making anti-bodies in the womb against the father's (and the fetus's) blood type. It's been some time, but I was taught that the first time it might actually be okay with some blood types, but the second time the fetus might be attacked by the leukocites (white blood cells) and destroyed.

I could be partially incorrect, but that's what I remember. Learned it some time ago, and my memory is good, but not photographic.

I was taught that blood type (as well as certain diseases) has to be tested before marriage is a good idea. Of course it also has to be determined if both parents are homozygous or heterozygous for certain diseases, and if the children will be born with the disease (homozygous).
 
It has to do with the mother making anti-bodies in the womb against the father's (and the fetus's) blood type. It's been some time, but I was taught that the first time it might actually be okay with some blood types, but the second time the fetus might be attacked by the leukocites (white blood cells) and destroyed.

I could be partially incorrect, but that's what I remember. Learned it some time ago, and my memory is good, but not photographic.

I was taught that blood type (as well as certain diseases) has to be tested before marriage is a good idea. Of course it also has to be determined if both parents are homozygous or heterozygous for certain diseases, and if the children will be born with the disease (homozygous).

.I understand about genetic diseases, but this is the first time I have ever heard about incompatible blood types, the only sources I can find are from naturopathic websites promoting “blood type diets”.

A reliable source for the dangers of blood group mixing would be appreciated, especially as man of the reliable sites I found about parents blood group and babies blood group give the expected blood type of a child conceived with all of eth possible combinations of parents blood groups, in no cases do these sites indicate that there may be a danger to the foetus/ child of parents of the “wrong” blood types.
 
.I understand about genetic diseases, but this is the first time I have ever heard about incompatible blood types, the only sources I can find are from naturopathic websites promoting “blood type diets”.

A reliable source for the dangers of blood group mixing would be appreciated, especially as man of the reliable sites I found about parents blood group and babies blood group give the expected blood type of a child conceived with all of eth possible combinations of parents blood groups, in no cases do these sites indicate that there may be a danger to the foetus/ child of parents of the “wrong” blood types.

Well, I could always scan some pages from my brother's wife's old books and put 'em on a Geoshitties free web site. I'll look into it. That's not a promise that it will be soon, though so if anyone wants to jump in with a good source feel free.
 
There is a tiny difference between testing for rare conditons and establishing a government program to enforce, uhm, racial balance, though, isn't there?

A small one?
 
There is a tiny difference between testing for rare conditons and establishing a government program to enforce, uhm, racial balance, though, isn't there?

A small one?

Racial balance isn't the correct term since all the races should mix. It's the ammounts that I disagree with. Liberals want everyone to just mix without thinking . . . while I, being 1/32 Black, hold a different oppinion. The original S.S. thought that if you are 1/32 of any race, including Jewish or Black, you are to be considered White and be able to be a citizen and marry a German girl. Since I am this exact mix, naturally I find this belief to be acceptable.

We care more about the breeding practices of our horses and dogs than we do about how our sons and daughters breed. Or, we say we care nothing about intelligence, deny the existance of a human nature rooted in biology in everyday life . . . but secretly are obsessed with intelligence when it comes to who our daughter marries.

No good can come of this hypocracy. Good breeding is a good idea. I mean, can you just think about whom you breed with once? Can you . . . for a nannosecond consider that evolution sometimes needs a little help?

I said a little help . . . no one wants to re-create the German experience of the 1930's. Someone who is . . . obsessed with breeding properly and hates "bad strains" most likely has forgotten that it's all about sex.

We have a cure for that.
 
No good can come of this hypocracy. Good breeding is a good idea. I mean, can you just think about whom you breed with once? Can you . . . for a nannosecond consider that evolution sometimes needs a little help?


Well yes, but just because it makes sense from a biological or evolutionary perspective, doesn't mean it's necessarily morally acceptable.

The gold old days when mother nature was free to do as she pleases are over. We can't even agree if people with severe disabilities or fatal disorders should be filtered out, that's how far it has gone.
 
Well yes, but just because it makes sense from a biological or evolutionary perspective, doesn't mean it's necessarily morally acceptable.

The gold old days when mother nature was free to do as she pleases are over. We can't even agree if people with severe disabilities or fatal disorders should be filtered out, that's how far it has gone.

And Nature won't put up with that, so before she does something stupid we need a nice easy philosophical sollution that doesn't re-creacte the German experience of the 30s. We have that . . . many philosophical goodies actually.

I've come to appreciate the thought that has gone into this recently. Sollutions, jokes . . . ways to tickle people into the sensible way of doing things. Many of my tribe have strained to find ways to adapt to every environment in America, including the South. The Bible Belt Heartland. They have found ways to survive and coexist with the most religious folks . . . upholding THEIR traditions while keeping their own ideas about breeding and child rearing and philosophy.

It's another world in the South complete with large billboards that say, "Unless you accept Jesus you will spend eternety in HELL!!!". Mennanites, Amish, Mormons, and Catholics. We bend over backwards for them, and have succeeded in making it clear that we all just want to mind our own business. It's great.

I went to a bluegrass festival recently in the South. I had a great time, and afterwards while watching all of these old men in charge of the country on the telivision (I'm under 40) back at the hotel I couldn't help thinking, "Has a President ever done what I just did?" I'm not saying it was a Klan rally, but the concert was open to everyone and I'm sure some of those folks were there. No one said anything about me other than maybe implying that I'm a bit of a nerd (Mamma's boy) and really should thrash my father for being such a prick. I couldn't agree more so really . .. I had no problems with anyone. I was very happy in fact.

Seriously . . . are the old men running the country loosing the ability to go to foreign peoples and be a good diplomat . . . like is in their job description? I can see objecting if a Prez is selling out like some kind of David Duke retard (I say he needs to be pantsed. Pull down the pants and laugh while drinking beer. He's in Russia right now so it would be a fun tour.) but seriously . . . people are people and fear is an obstacle to overcome if you want to lead people in the right direction.

I'm not trying to brag since I was humbled as I reflected. I was exhillerated that I did it, but I also thought of my country and all the people living here that might feel afraid sometimes, need to be protected, and need hope and strength. It made me feel good. :)

We WILL evolve at a comfortable rate. We WILL let the wave of weirdness glide around us and not flinch. Our ideas about freedom and liberty and peace will survive. We all will get what we want . . . without the headache that all the old methods left us with.

Get into it. Learn what has been achieved by hardworking men in the field . . . if you have the courage to evolve, that is.
 
Get into it. Learn what has been achieved by hardworking men in the field . . . if you have the courage to evolve, that is.


Personally, I think I'll pass. I'm pretty much for letting people breed with anyone they want, for any reason they want.

It's not an issue that is high up on my list of concerns.
 

Back
Top Bottom