FTA:
The official story we've been told about 9/11 is absolutely, physically impossible.
Those words are not just backed up with his qualifications because his presentation goes through the hard physics as well.
See, it doesn't give us the details of the presentation so what is he claiming?
The presentation moves on and goes through some of the just plain crazy theories of why the towers fell, such as space beams, holograms, missiles, orbs, pterodactyls, etc., and easily debunks them. Torin then adds, “There is evidence most of these are put out by the government as disinfo.” Then explains how the White House, in violation of the law, has bought 28 billion, “Billion with a B” in fake news.
Now any crazy theory couldn't have been thought up by "truthers," they are far too smart.
NIST never models what happens after the collapse initiation, and even what they do model before that is easily debunked.
This is how he dismisses NIST, "easily debunked." A 10,000 page paper is never "easily debunked."
Torin uses his expertise to explain to the audience how and why a real progressive collapse occurs and subsequently why the WTC was not a progressive collapse. “The biggest problem with the argument,” Torin explains. “Time.”
Once again, the article doesn't go into detail as to what Torin said just that he explained it well enough for the author to be swayed.
Referring to WTC 2:
How long did it take for the building to fall in reality? About 8.6 Seconds.
Very few "truthers" accept such a low number, most put it around 12-14.
For the towers to fall at so close to free fall speed, over 110,000 separate and independent structural support points had to fail simultaneously.
No source is cited for these 110,000 that have to fail.
Torin then gives his expert analysis on building 7 for about five minutes.
Once again, no explanation given on what his expert opinion was followed by the usual "truther" crap on WTC 7
He then brings up the EPA, not really central to a CT or OCT story. Also mentions the steel being shipped off before being tested, blatantly false search here if you want why.
All of this followed by the thermite/thermate/super quadruple therm(ate/ite) claim...
Then more common CT theory, FBI's most wanted list (once your most wanted you can't be most most wanted).
Here he repeats the motive for Bush and takes a shot at his fellow soldier:
An invasion of Afghanistan that was on Bush's desk two days before 9/11, over 655,000 admitted dead in the spreading war in the middle east, cheap heroin out of Afghanistan that the former Taliban government destroyed, soon to be full scale war in Iran, several thousand dead troops, and an oppressive police state at home being enforced by some of the returning aggravated felons that were doing the same in Iraq.
Followed by an argument that may or may not be true that 15000 - 17000 U.S. troops are dead. All wrapped up with a Q&A and the evils of law enforcement speech.
Nothing new or earth shattering presented (maybe there was but we didn't get to see the presentation or even get a synopsis of it), just the opinion of one man who claims to have great/impossible credentials.
