• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bigfoot - The Patterson-Gimlin Film

Status
Not open for further replies.
What's hiding your foot Patty? Why you lookin' down??
 

Attachments

  • PDVD_213.jpg
    PDVD_213.jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 0
Still lookin' down? Now where did BOTH your feet go???
 

Attachments

  • PDVD_234.jpg
    PDVD_234.jpg
    82.7 KB · Views: 0
Foreground only? Doubtful. This debris engulfs her feet. Only way through--Patty's shock absorber legs to the rescue! What's that!! Could it be??? Why yes, it's the shadow of her knee!
 

Attachments

  • PDVD_322.jpg
    PDVD_322.jpg
    86.9 KB · Views: 3
Patty is on her way to do some THUMPING IN WHITEHALL.

Preach on Kerry! Brother Anderholm is on a roll!
 
Oops! Is she stuck between these trees? Nope. Glides right on through. No problem if you're built like a Squatch. Bob Heironimus? He'd have fainted from heat exhaustion already!

:D
 

Attachments

  • PDVD_372.jpg
    PDVD_372.jpg
    86.4 KB · Views: 0
tube said:
Patty is on her way to do some THUMPING IN WHITEHALL.

Preach on Kerry! Brother Anderholm is on a roll!
Click to expand...

She'd better watch out down there. Champ may get jealous about all the attention.

I should add, if you don't know the area, Whitehall is a rough tough little town, pretty down at heels. Once the hub of canal, railroad ahd highway for the area, now half-abandoned and the other half....well, let's just say that although the town apparently passed an ordinance protecting bigfoot, it was probably not so much to prevent patty from being hunted as being mugged. Of course there's also a possibility that Patty is living in an apartment somewhere along the canal and nobody noticed.
 
Last edited:
My point stands. I could keep going. I've got hundreds of them. I know you're gonna fight tooth and nail to say what's in the pictures is only a depth perception issue. That's wishful thinking.

You HAVE to argue that or all your wishes about a man in a suit will come tumbling down.

The fact is that the subject you are viewing is not a man.

Mock me and make fun of me all you want, this ain't going away.
 
Luminous,

WTF DUDE??? I'm not sure why I give a sh!#, maybe it's that I have a soft spot in my heart for the underdog? You're so far behind that you think you're in first. Go to this link find small.avi, right-click and save as. Then let me know what frame or frames you think this thing is stepping over anything, I'll pull the stills and show you why you are wrong. When we are finished with that I'll draw you a F-ing picture and show you the sand pathway that it walks, also, look at Murphys 3-D of the area and try to grasp his interpretation of the events.

http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/browse/mangler/18111


m
 
Well, at last I saw the "Best Evidence" bigfoot episode.

I must say it made me proud of us, given the fact that most of the arguments used there were also discussed here.

Feet with the mid-tarsal breaks but human-like toes; incoherent footprint shapes; primate eyes not being adapted to nocturnal lifestyle; humans can walk like Patty; FX expert of PGF time say Patty can be a costume; lack of fossil register to back the bigfoot-gigantopithecus connection; lack of hairs, poop and DNA; lack of a specimen; unreliability of eyewitnesses reports; lack of reliable photographic evidence; doubts if (non-human) large primates can be sustained by the forests where bigfeet are supposed to live; how bigfeet cope with winter,etc. Pick the subject and it has been discussed here before. Actually we discussed a larger number of issues, including Skookum cast, alleged dermals and PGF minutiae, among some.

I think they should have dumped the traditional "we're loking at blahblahblah" review after each commercial break and focus other issues such as Skookum cast and "dermals". Our memory does not flows down with the commercial-break pee (well at least mine does not).

Something else that caught my attention- the similarities between the experiences reproted by Meldrum and Kitakaze.

Despite some "maybe who knows" comments in the end, I would say proponents were not very happy with it...
 
I will never try to download a file from you again. It just crashed my whole computer. Luckily, I was able to reboot it. There better not be any viruses in that file.

Chris Murphy is a nice guy. But the film itself shows large amounts of debris that are not represented in the sandbox picture. The pictures of the debris I posted are not even represented on the model. I don't think Murphy was even considering the debris laden area that Patty walked through. His main point was to show the direction Patty walked. He wasn't thinking much about the minor obstacles such as the miscellaneous logs, boulders and trees that Patty was navigating. Yes, I see he placed a few logs and rocks there as a general reference of location, but the P/G film shows a whole lot more.

In fact, I'll try to contact Chris and see what he says about it.

Don't be too sure of youself...
 
Last edited:
Case Closed.

In fact, forget it. I have made my case. The film speaks for itself.

There are really only three things a skeptic can do when faced with solid photographic evidence such as this, 1) pretend it's not there (ignore it), 2) make personal attacks against the poster or, 3) run away with no explaination whatsoever. All are admissions of defeat.

These pictures are damning evidence that the P/G creature is real and that Bob Hironimas in a suit could not have traversed the area without fumbling, tripping and falling.

Patty, yes. Hironimas, no. Case closed.

And I bid you all a fond farewell...

:D
 
Luminous said:
I will never try to download a file from you again. It just crashed my whole computer. Luckily, I was able to reboot it. There better not be any viruses in that file.
Click to expand...

Luminous:
I was able to download Manglers file without any problems and without any signs of viruses. It was actually a very small download (5MB), and it opened right up.

Mangler:
Thats a great clip I didnt have one with frame numbers included

Thanks
Rick
 
Looooomy, ( I really like that nick-name WP, it just kind of rolls off the tongue.)


15 years of transferring data and you're my first kill, maybe there is justice in the world. Thou it does seem kind of convenient that you couldn't download.

You know Loomy, I have lots and lots of stills with numbers and arrows and stuff, where you can follow Pattersons motion and see how the whole perspective thing works, get a feeling for the lay of the land, it's kinda like bein there. Come on, don't be mad.

BTW next time you are out with LAL ask her about Nolls Tule elk speculation, I never did get a reply from her. :jaw-dropp


m
 
I had no problems downloading the file either. Like rgann said, it was a small file at 5 megs. It's a shame Luminous didn't download it. It gave a good indication of the sort of debris (or lack thereof in this case) in the pathway.
 
Loomy,


I know you're lurking. I was hoping to pop this diagram on you later, but what the hell. See if you can figure out what it's about. Come on, tell us what it means.

m

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom