Flyover Witnesses

Lyte Trip said:
Hey guys, so when exactly were you guys going to tell Lagasse and Brooks, oh and Robert, that they are wrong?

I was just curious?
Click to expand...

did you have the "grapes" to tell laggasse he was wrong about the impact? if so what was his response? did you explain to him your crass flyover "alternative"? did you explain to father mcgraw and lloyd england about your slanderous opinion of their stories?

BV
 
JimBenArm said:
So, just out of curiosity, did you tell them they were wrong about the plane hitting the Pentagon?
Since you were behind your Dell, and not there on 9/11, either.
Click to expand...

Yeah we did. And we REALLY told them they were wrong about the light poles.

Brooks called our film an eye-opener. Imagine that.

Did you want to be the one to explain to them how they didn't see the plane on the North side? Did you want to tell them how it came on the South side and clipped the 5 light poles wrecking the wings and impeding a successful impact, and leaving Lloyd's cab hood unscratched and Lloyd with an impressive stopping distance?

So what did it impact the building from the North side of the Citgo? Are you sure about that?
 
Lyte Trip said:
You guys are the best. It's like watching a circus.

Hey guys, so when exactly were you guys going to tell Lagasse and Brooks, oh and Robert, that they are wrong?

I was just curious?

Anybody have the grapes to correct Lagasse...on camera, on the phone?

Because clearly, you all, who are behind your dells and were not there on 9/11 know better of course. For sure. Most definitely.
Click to expand...

Arrange the meeting and I'll sit on camera with the three of you. I wouldn't tell them anything, I would simply sit down with them and discuss all the evidence with them from that day and see where it goes. I would prefer someplace indoors versus the side of the road so we could actually hear though.
 
We had the grapes to tell Lagasse, Brooks, and Turcios that they did not witness an impact. And that the plane did not hit any light poles.

Have you guys decided when you were going to tell them that they are wrong about what they saw?
 
CurtC said:
Just to close the loop, if the plane had gone from Paik, to the North of the Citgo, then it could not have made the turn to the right and to the impact point of the Pentagon, unless it was flying very slowly and making a drastic bank.
Click to expand...

so, summarising the CIT "evidence":-
a few discredited drawings.
hazy contradictory recollections from interviewees.
errr that's it.............

the other side if the coin:-
NO witnesses to a flyover.
many who witnessed an impact.
many who witnessed the aftermath of the plane crash.
many who witnessed plane wreckage/victims/damage consistent with the above.
and, the kick in the teeth, DNA evidence of those on board.

case closed m'lud

BV
 
roger said:
I'm really, really confused as to why I didn't see the flyover, insomuch as

1) I was on the 6th floor balcony of my office building when it happened.
2) This balcony faces the pentagon and reagen national airport.
3) As I sit here I'm watching a plane take off from national airport.
4) While I cannot see the pentagon from here, as it is obscured by trees, I could see the results (smoke)
5) During that day, we watched aircraft be escorted into national by military jets.
6) Any flight path that could have resulted in the plane being totally hidden from view from me the entire time from its movement from the pentagon to DCA or IAD would result in such a low flight path that thousands of people in dozens of neighborhoods would have seen and reported it.

I'm also really, really confused by the statements of my coworkers, who were in the Pentagon at the time of impact, walked out past the airplane debris, and walked here to our offices here. How did they see plane debris when no plane was there.

Not to mention the dozens of other tall office buildings and apartment buildings in the area that provide views of DCA and the Pentagon. It's just so confusing to understand how we watched all the other flight traffic in the area, but somehow missed the flyover. But there must be some explanation. Think, roger, think!!!!
Click to expand...

Hi Roger,

Here let me help you.

You couldn't see the Pentagon as it is obscured by trees, you only saw the aftermath-smoke. You didn't even see the fireball.

To sum it up, you missed it and could not see it happen by your own admission.

Your friends saw what we believe to be the debris that was blown out from the "storage" and/or "office" tailers in front of the "impact hole".

Were ALL the people in "the dozens of other tall office buildings and apartment buildings in the area that provide views of DCA and the Pentagon" ALL staring out their windows at the final 3-4 seconds of the planes flight path? The exact moment the plane went by?

Did you, any of your friends, or all those people in the dozens of other tall buildings see the plane on the South side? Are you or your friends going to tell Lagasse and Brooks, and Robert Turcios and the men in the swat truck and all the other genuine people who saw it on the North side of the Citgo that they are wrong?
 
Hey Lyte...since I don't have their contact information, please pass this message along to Lagasse, Brooks and Turcios...

YOU'RE WRONG

Thanks Lyte!
 
Lyte Trip said:
We had the grapes to tell Lagasse, Brooks, and Turcios that they did not witness an impact. And that the plane did not hit any light poles.

Have you guys decided when you were going to tell them that they are wrong about what they saw?
Click to expand...
All you have is the lies you have made up about a north of the Citgo station. You have been wrong and proven so on 9/11. You lost this one Lyte, but at least had the grapes to ask.

Your flight path is impossible and yet you persist and will try to sell the lies anyone can see wrong with all your falsified testimony. There are too many witnesses who will not talk to you because you are a flaming fraud. Someone needs to follow up with your witnesses and tell them how bad you have messed up 9/11 and the fraud you are doing.

You have lost this one Lyte too. You witnesses testimony in 2001 makes your whole story fraud no matter what they say now. Do you understand, they impeached themselves. Your witnesses are now worthless due to what they said in 2001. If you need help ask a lawyer the problems you now have with your pile of lies, or not lies. When a witness changes a story they are not credible. This makes your whole show fraud. Your drawing lines for witnesses is also stupid and makes their testimony worthless.

Con is the key to you and your fraud to sell misinformation a first grader could see through.
 
bonavada said:
so, summarising the CIT "evidence":-
a few discredited drawings.
hazy contradictory recollections from interviewees.
errr that's it.............

the other side if the coin:-
NO witnesses to a flyover.
many who witnessed an impact.
many who witnessed the aftermath of the plane crash.
many who witnessed plane wreckage/victims/damage consistent with the above.
and, the kick in the teeth, DNA evidence of those on board.

case closed m'lud

BV
Click to expand...

Yeah totally.:D
 
This is a very simple question and requires the simplist of answers, yes or no.

Is there a single witness anywhere that says Flight 77 flew low and at high speed over the Pentagon yes or no?

YES or NO.
 
Wartrac said:
Arrange the meeting and I'll sit on camera with the three of you. I wouldn't tell them anything, I would simply sit down with them and discuss all the evidence with them from that day and see where it goes. I would prefer someplace indoors versus the side of the road so we could actually hear though.
Click to expand...

Oh no. That is for you to do.

And BTW, they are well aware of "all the evidence".

What is there to discuss other than them making you understand where the plane was at?

Please, by all means. Do it. Call the pentagon police and set up a meeting with them.

Make sure you set up a meeting with Robert and Edward too. Oh and all the other people who saw it on the North side. You have to "discuss it" with them too, you know?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Yeah totally.:D
Click to expand...
Good, at least you know you are selling misinformation to fools. It is better that you admit you are selling lies instead of defending them as the truth. Thanks for telling the truth and being honest about your foul attempt to make money.
 
lapman said:
Why isn't the flyover shown in the DoubleTree Hotel video?
Click to expand...

What if it was?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eSkvV_r6DE

I know, I know. The object everybody thought was the plane is just a truck. Right? It is isn't it? Isn't it?

And of course, clearly you can trust video released by the perps after being withheld for 5 yrs after we discovered the North side/pull up flight path and actual description of the plane.
 
Lyte...why did you abandon the other Pentagon Witness Thread? Are you planning on going back to defend your position?
 
Lyte Trip said:
What if it was?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eSkvV_r6DE

I know, I know. The object everybody thought was the plane is just a truck. Right? It is isn't it? Isn't it?
Click to expand...
Yeah, we all know that gets fly along at 70mph. Ok. Yet, with it "flying" that slow, nobody saw it. Hmmm I'd say it was a truck.
And of course, clearly you can trust video released by the perps after being withheld for 5 yrs after we discovered the North side/pull up flight path and actual description of the plane.
Click to expand...
Ahh, the ol' altered video excuse. Yet we are supposed to believe your incredibly biased "investigation" of 6 year old memories. So, show the editing on the video.
 
lapman said:
Yet we are supposed to believe your incredibly biased "investigation" of 6 year old memories. So, show the editing on the video.
Click to expand...

Oh Ok. So what's your first and last name? So we can publish on our site how you are going to go tell Lagasse and Brooks that their memory of which side of the gas station they saw the plane on is wrong.

Because clearly you were there and you know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom