Susan McElwein Interview

[GregoryUrich]

The GPWS is radar-based and I'll bet it point down when the plane isn't doing acrobatics and since the plane was inverted, the radar was pointing up to the sky.

Good point!

 

[TC329]

Have you ever, once, just once, just one time, gotten anything right?

1) She was looking at the spot where the fireball rose.

Correctly, at the intersection of Bridge St & Buckstown Rd in Stoystown, PA. Roughly 1.2 miles SouthWest of the fireball.

2) That's exactly where the plane she says she saw was headed.

Correct. It was flying NORTHEAST towards the explosion.

3) That's exactly when the plane she says she saw was there.

Agreed.

4) Several people were looking at that exact spot at that exact time.

Not before the explosion but after it, that is correct.

5) There was only one explosion and fireball.

Correct.

6) There was only one airliner.

Incorrect. There were 4 planes in the immediate vacinity.

1) "UA93"
2) "Fighter Jet 1"
3) "Fighter Jet 2"
4) "UAV"

7) No one saw a different plane there at that time.

Incorrect. There are many eyewitness accounts in the printed media of the "little white plane". The fighter jet accounts come from people like me going there and interviewing eyewitnesses.

And why is Johnstown Air Traffic Control under a gag order?

And West Moreland Country 911 Operators?

And who has all the 911 calls from the Indian Lake residents calling about the plane that flew over "breaking apart on their homes"?

8) Your see-saw analogy does not render calculations moot.

My eyewitness accounts render fairy tales to rest.

9) Grow up. Your behavior is despicable.

The next couple months are really going to suck for you.....

 

[WildCat]

Incorrect. There were 4 planes in the immediate vacinity.

1) "UA93"
2) "Fighter Jet 1"
3) "Fighter Jet 2"
4) "UAV"

 

[TC329]

So you're saying Lee Purbaugh is lying about the "little white plane" and telling the truth about "UA93"?

 

[WildCat]

So you're saying Lee Purbaugh is lying about the "little white plane" and telling the truth about "UA93"?

No, I think it's hilarious that you somehow derive 2 fighter jets and a UAV from that.

 

[TC329]

No, I think it's hilarious that you somehow derive 2 fighter jets and a UAV from that.

So Susan McElwain and other locals like the 3 Seniors interviewed who all describe 2 fighters jets are the liars?

Susan also saw the same 'UAV' Purbaugh saw after the crash. And there are also other published accounts of it like Dale Browning who said "Everybody has seen this thing but no one can tell us what it is." Indian Lake employees saw it before (flying NORTH towards Stoystown) and also saw it afterwards. Quite a few published and unpublished accounts.

 

[WildCat]

So Susan McElwain and other locals like the 3 Seniors interviewed who all describe 2 fighters jets are the liars?

They did?

Susan also saw the same 'UAV' Purbaugh saw after the crash. And there are also other published accounts of it like Dale Browning who said "Everybody has seen this thing but no one can tell us what it is."

It was a Dassault Falcon 20 business jet owned by the VF Corp.

 

[Lyte Trip]

It was a Dassault Falcon 20 business jet owned by the VF Corp.

No, unless the Falcon looked like a brand new mini van sized UAV hybrid that flew low enough that it was below phone lines.

The mystery is solved.

 

[WildCat]

No, unless the Falcon looked like a brand new mini van sized UAV hybrid that flew low enough that it was below phone lines.

And who makes this "UAV hybrid"? Toyota?



And why would a UAV need to fly below phone lines?

 

[TC329]

They did?


It was a Dassault Falcon 20 business jet owned by the VF Corp.

So then in the video when I show Susan a picture of a Dassault Falcon 20 business jet owned by the VF Corp and ask her if that was the plane and she says "NO" you're saying she's lying?

 

[Arus808]

tc - everyone to lYTE is a liar, unless they make a statement that supports his ideology.

 

[WildCat]

So then in the video when I show Susan a picture of a Dassault Falcon 20 business jet owned by the VF Corp and ask her if that was the plane and she says "NO" you're saying she's lying?

Or mistaken, doesn't really matter. But a "UAV hybrid" flying below phone lines? What the hell for? Bring it on home terrorcell!

 

[Reheat]

No, unless the Falcon looked like a brand new mini van sized UAV hybrid that flew low enough that it was below phone lines.

The mystery is solved.

You're really good! I'll bet that was the same thing that knocked down the light poles at the Pentagon. Now that mystery is solved too.

That's not a "hole in one", that's "two in one". Wow!

 

[TC329]

And who makes this "UAV hybrid"? Toyota?



And why would a UAV need to fly below phone lines?

I thought this was the home of "critical thinking"?

Now why would the military fly a UAV close to the ground below treelines? The most logical answer which requites very little "critical thinking" would be to attempt to keep the number of eyewitnesses to said craft at a minimum.

 

[TC329]

Or mistaken, doesn't really matter. But a "UAV hybrid" flying below phone lines? What the hell for? Bring it on home terrorcell!

"or mistaken"?

Pick one.

 

[TC329]

You're really good! I'll bet that was the same thing that knocked down the light poles at the Pentagon. Now that mystery is solved too.

That's not a "hole in one", that's "two in one". Wow!

I don't understand why the moderators tolerate this type of garbage.

 

[WildCat]

I thought this was the home of "critical thinking"?

Now why would the military fly a UAV close to the ground below treelines? The most logical answer which requites very little "critical thinking" would be to attempt to keep the number of eyewitnesses to said craft at a minimum.

Funny, because actual military UAV's fly at very high altitudes to avoid detection. Your "UAV hybrid" is flying 20 feet above the ground on a highway! No one will ever notice that!



I really need to go to bed, but this is just too funny!

 

[Reheat]

I don't understand why the moderators tolerate this type of garbage.

Yep, it is...just like what you're posting.......

 

[TC329]

Funny, because actual military UAV's fly at very high altitudes to avoid detection. Your "UAV hybrid" is flying 20 feet above the ground on a highway! No one will ever notice that!



I really need to go to bed, but this is just too funny!

North on Bridge St in Stoystown = Highway



Seems appropriate. No wonder I don't waste my time on this board. I see why someone else said Lyte calls everyone here a liar. You're either one of the most ignorant human beings I have ever encountered on a message board or a paid hack. You make things up like "highways" to support a story that is a fabrication and to further insure more Americans will die in the middle east to line the elite of this country's pockets with more gold. If you're not ignorant of the topic you're attempting to discredit then you're a traitor.

 

[Reheat]

One would think that these guys would use their resources. There are several at PFT that proclaim themselves Aircraft Accident Investigation "EXPERTS".

These amateur investigators obvious need training and one of the very first things the "EXPERTS" will tell them is that unqualified witnesses are notoriously unreliable for these types of incidents.

Nah, there has to be a brain for learning first!