Other than the main one, which is his continued employment by them, which you refuse to confront honestly
Good thinking Baldrick. And he takes his claims about 911 to the authorities who were so good in their investigation into 911 already, that would be a great idea! And moreover, the case would be brouhgt against him, not vice versa
I would, but this is completely irrelevant.
There is no denial to be found anyway, by the millions of people looking into this on either side. So we can say that there is no known rebuttal, which is my point
i dont even remember that, but you would almost certainly have misunderstood
no, just that your comments smack of it, which again is something very differnt
Substantially, no
Lol, the power down happened to them. They have not come out and refuted any allegations that have been made against them which imply that they were thus party to anything nefarious happening that weekend. Millions of peple are aware of this, but tFT choose not to comment, and try to hush up Forbes
#
such as?
oh please, how the hell is this deflection it was used to show a point
a lot from what I have seen
What? what do the surveys tell you? Is this hard to understand?
There are 70-100 who come, which isnt bad for minimal publicity
maybe they do not know about his claims, it is only your word for it that they do, how honest is that? should i email them and ask them if they are aware of his claims, not his apparent implications that you read into his statements but his initial claims? if i do and they are aware of them then he has nothing to fear?
snideness and rudeness again, the fact that he is in the uk would mean that he would be going to the uk authorities not the us ones, not the people who had already investigated it, and a lawsuit against them if they sacked him would not happen because it would be a uk industrial tribunal, you know very well this is different than the us system, how could they bring a case against him if he is telling the truth, he just needs to tell the police he has proof that FT are covering something up
as irrelevant as his real name remark you made, you are a coward for not answering about your actions if it was you
there is no denial by FT but you have said there was?
so from my comments you are inferring i am facist or have facist beliefs? back this up? do you know the leanings of the political parties in the UK? try and guess which one i vote for?
waffle, they have changed and you said they had not, the amount of time, the fact that he does not know for certain that it was all floors after claiming he did, these are changes whether you like it or not
has his story changed, yes it has, he has made conflicting statements regarding this weekend, some of which we now know are false
no, the power down apparently happened to all floors from the 50th up, this did not only affect FT, so they quite conceviably not be the only ones implicated? were they the only business on these floors?
he has never at any point implicated FT, if you continue to say he has show it or stop claiming it, see previous posts regarding proof
if you want to read between the lines like you seem to like to do you would see that it seems more like he is implicating the PA
a point that was irrelevant to what we were discussing, it adds nothing or detracts zero from his story
a lot, is that hundreds or thousands or millions?
surveys? millions of people worldwide believe bush and his administration carried out these murders to go to war in afghanistan do they?
more than believe it was 19 hijackers?
70 to 100 out of a population of what? are you saying internet is little or poor advertising for these meetings?
