PixyMisa
Persnickety Insect
And the World Ice Theory and other strangeness.
Not even remotely true.
Unfettered capitalism certainly has its problems, because remote externalities are hard to factor into the calcations of local optima. However, it still produces wealth, whereas communism consumes it.
Communism reduces the total wealth in the system, and spreads the poverty equally among the populace except for the party favoured. Unfettered capitalism increases the total wealth of the system, but generates huge income disparities. It also, however, brings about a moderately affluent middle class, and allows for class mobility.
We've learned that it's best to moderate capitalism, to smooth out the boom/bust cycles a little and provide a social safety net. But to equate the effects of communism and those of capitalism is pure baloney.
Only so long as you can convince everyone that the State's word is the word of God. The problem with keeping this going with Christianity is that religion's deep tradition of personal revelation. As soon as enough nutters (or even one sufficiently influential nutter) hear God say something in a dream contrary to official State doctrine, the system weakens, and eventually collapses. History gives no reason to think such dreams rare enough to sustain the situation for very long at all.There is no reason why the Chruch and Stae could not merge, allowing one feilty to both. See the ofical NAZI religion, or the Christianity of Fascist type regemes.
If there were a Hell, Mother Theresa would no doubt be burning in its deepest depths right now. Apparently you form your opinion about things and people by watching television and listening to the propaganda from the Catholic Church. She was an evil woman who imposed untold suffering on the people she "helped" by refusing to spend money to cure them or spare them more suffering. She supported the Duvalier family in Haiti. If she is an example of a good Christian, other Christians should be ashamed.
Wikipedia says:Well, originally it was this- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestant_Reich_Church
The only "official" element herein is Hitler worship. Nazism regarded religions under the exclusive aspect of being beneficial or detrimental to the Nazi leadership. The Nazi ideology per se is non-religious, at least atheist. Except to Hitler himself, of course. Hitler worship served as pseudo-religious offer to the masses. The usual homely Herrgottswinkel (there is no english word for that I think; it is a corner of a room devoted to worship, provided with a crucifix, Jesus picture, Madonna figure or so) was replaced by an image of the Führer, decorated with fresh flowers. The Nazis even made up prayers replacing Jesus/God by and equating them to Hitler.Later there was that strange mixture of neo-paganism, Christianity and Hitler worship.
![]()
You got any proof for any of that?
Again, not even remotely true. The middle class grows even under unfettered capitalism. I'll clarify one thing - the middle class arose much earlier than did capitalism. However, the point that the middle class grows under all forms of capitalism is established historical fact.Wrong. Sorry.Common mistake, of course, since we DO moderate capitalism. You were doing OK until you mentioned the middle class, something that exists ONLY because of restrictions on capitalism.
I'll be honest with you... although I don't seem able to explain it, I think we're really talking about the same thing.Again, not even remotely true. The middle class grows even under unfettered capitalism. I'll clarify one thing - the middle class arose much earlier than did capitalism. However, the point that the middle class grows under all forms of capitalism is established historical fact.
Now, one particular aspect of historical capitalism that is worth examining is extreme vertical integration - where the car maker owns the steel mills, and the houses the workers live in, and the stores they buy their food and clothing at. Such a system is clearly internally communist - it's a tightly centrally-planned economy. Haldane was actually wrong on this subject, but 1928 was too soon to know; such a system even on the scale of the early Ford company is actually less efficient than breaking the company up and having the independent units compete for business with one another. The reason companies don't often do this any more is that the ones that try it tend to lose out. (Where we do find large-scale vertical integration, we also find heavy government involvement.)
But that's capitalism for you.
No. Communism requires absolute fealty to the state. There can be no competition. Christianity requires absolute fealty to God. There can be no competition. Choose ye this day whom ye will serve, DOC.
It takes a particularly naive idealism to believe communism could be carried out without a central authority.According to Wiki one of the goals of Communism is to achieve a "stateless" society. Wiki also has a article on Christian Communism.
It takes a particularly naive idealism to believe communism could be carried out without a central authority.
But, if you like, replace "State" with "Community". The point stands. God, or the community. You cannot serve two masters.
Okay then.I'll be honest with you... although I don't seem able to explain it, I think we're really talking about the same thing.
Yes. Are you about to equivocate on serve? Because that will be fun to watch.Isn't it generally accepted that the Christian God wants you to serve the community.
Well, Mother Theresa and Pope John Paul II might be considered true Christians. I have a feeling the world would be a pretty nice place to live if everyone were like them.
One could ask would the world be better off if everyone was like Mother Theresa and John Paul II or would the world be better off if everyone was an atheist?
I heard a rumor that a guy known as Martin Luther nailed 99 feces onto a church door as a protest against corruption in the Christian church, Doc.I have to feel a big part of the collapse of the Soviet Union had to do with corruption, and also a lack of enthusiasm, spirit, and direction amongst its people. If the official state doctrine of the former Soviet Union had been Christianity instead of Atheism is it possible it could have been successful?
Maybe not for the state, but for life in general. And that's where the Atheistic doctrine comes in.
I mean why does Atheism have to be tied into Communism. Couldn't Christianity be just as easily tied into Communism as Atheism.
You mean like the so-called "free market capitalism" with zero government control that the idiot right-wingers claim will solve all of our problems? THAT sort of government system?
Global Warming, solved.Joobz said:Both of them were celibate. If we were all to be like them, we would last only one generation.
Maybe it was shakerism that killed off the dinosaurs?Global Warming, solved.
DR