Ron Paul has become the perennial candidate, which is synonymous with loser. Except of course, the perennial candidate's ideas may well show up in the winning candidate's platform. Anyway, most of Paul's support seems to come from people who envision themselves as sturdy, self-sufficient pioneer types or from single-issue voters who have an ax to grind with some federal agency. They are in most respects as dependent on government services as anyone but choose to overlook it.
And didn't our profusion of government-run services evolve out of the needs of our expanding society for unity and direction in our increasingly sophisticated infrastructure. I mean, aside from some mountain men, who of us wants to see no surcease from having to dig his own wells, cut his own firewood, gouge out his own roads, round up and shoot them rustlers, ride his horse wherever to communicate with a doctor or perhaps anybody? How well would all this work in the midst of a city, anyway?
That's why we've established public agencies providing uniform utilitarian services, we hope under the supervision of specialists who can do it a lot better than we can. And this, we also hope, will free us to use our heads for less mundane, more innovative things, which is where the unique strength of human beings lies.