• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jack McClellan - Legal Pedophile

Hey, if what NAMBLA does is legal, what's wrong with a NAMGLA? I'd bet it would have a bigger, more robust, member-ship.
 
Ahh, yes this has been a very hot local story around my parts. There are parents stalking him now, showing his picture at events and such. What I find frightening about this individual is that he is lacking the part of his brain that says "don't go public about your desires, and don't act on them".
 
Katana said:
It is no doubt disturbing, but of what crime is he guilty? Even the judge on Faux News admits that he has not done anything illegal.
Click to expand...
It seems like he's abetting (encouraging and assisting) felons.
 
casebro said:
Hey, if what NAMBLA does is legal, what's wrong with a NAMGLA? I'd bet it would have a bigger, more robust, member-ship.
Click to expand...
That's a good point. What exactly does NAMBLA do, anyway? Do they simply advocate changing the pedophilia law? There's nothing wrong with advocating that...though the whole concept is creepy.
 
No no no this is so wrong I dont care if its legal or not it is sick.We should be protecting our children not letting evil people prey on them.The though of my daughter's picture being on this web-site with perverts oggling her fills me with disgust.
 
EGarrett said:
That's a good point. What exactly does NAMBLA do, anyway? Do they simply advocate changing the pedophilia law? There's nothing wrong with advocating that...though the whole concept is creepy.
Click to expand...


They advocate abolishing age of consent laws completely. They also promote the "acceptance of intergenerational sexual relationships", meaning, they want to normalize having sex with very young boys.
 
petra10 said:
No no no this is so wrong I dont care if its legal or not it is sick.We should be protecting our children not letting evil people prey on them.The though of my daughter's picture being on this web-site with perverts oggling her fills me with disgust.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's been real fun having a beautiful young girl around these parts lately, let me tell you. This guy is lacking in all sense. He has no problem keeping up this website, even when his identity has been revealed. This makes me think the leap to offending outright is not very far for him. What really makes me sick is people are out there reading his "tips". How dangerous are these people?
 
NAMBLA is pretty wimpy. The sex-with-girls people have a much bigger web presence.

petra10, if you allow your daughter to go out in a public place, you have to acknowledge the possibility of perverts ogling her. And as for Jack, his site appears to be down, and people are following him around with cameras and then posting the pictures to their websites.

Myself, I'm a big advocate of only prosecuting people for actual crimes. The guy is clearly messed up in many ways. There are many people out there doing a much better job of preying on children. This guy will be lucky if he even gets within 10 feet of a child again.
 
The sites you had linked to are discussing illegal behaviour so should not be linked to from this site - it is a breach of Rule 1.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, I actually found the website on wayback. It's extremely lame. It would be a lame website about cooking if the guy were into cooking. There's almost no pictures, and those that are there have the faces obscured. There are lots of links to pictures of girls from newspapers, movies, etc., but mostly it's incoherent rants about such important topics as drugs and what the night sky looks like in rural areas.

I didn't find anything I'd call how-to information. Links to local roller rinks, yes. Oh, and a lot of links to laws. Links to Barney.

He's a creep and some sort of deranged narcissist, but I haven't seen evidence that he's been caught doing anything illegal.

Conker's sites, especially the first one, are far more disturbing.
 
Miss Anthrope said:
Yeah, it's been real fun having a beautiful young girl around these parts lately, let me tell you. This guy is lacking in all sense. He has no problem keeping up this website, even when his identity has been revealed. This makes me think the leap to offending outright is not very far for him. What really makes me sick is people are out there reading his "tips". How dangerous are these people?
Click to expand...

Probably less dangerous than some of those who are rather less open.
 
Miss Anthrope said:
Yeah, it's been real fun having a beautiful young girl around these parts lately, let me tell you. This guy is lacking in all sense. He has no problem keeping up this website, even when his identity has been revealed. This makes me think the leap to offending outright is not very far for him. What really makes me sick is people are out there reading his "tips". How dangerous are these people?
Click to expand...

Who's hosting his site? Shoot them an e-mail. They may not take too kindly to the content of his site if they get enough e-mails about it.
 
I remember the first time I ever heard of NAMBLA. I thought it was a joke. I thought these people could not really be serious. How could there possibly really be such an organization. With the advent of the internet you become exposed to tons of things you could not possibly have imagined. There are a number of things, when I first encountered them, I couldn't possibly believe they were real or true. The world is stranger even than we can imagine.
 
Judge Slaps Publicity-Seeking Pedophile With Restraining Order

Jack McClellan, the self-professed pedophile who has attracted international attention for his Web site with pictures of kids and tips for other pedophiles, is now barred from coming closer than 30 feet of any minor in California.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Melvin Sandvig on Friday placed a temporary restraining order against McClellan, who admits he is attracted to young girls but has never been arrested for any related crime.

Under the order, McClellan is also forbidden to contact any child under the age of 18 in any way, including e-mail and messaging; he may not loiter in areas where children congregate, such as parks and playgrounds; and he may not photograph or videotape any child without written parental consent, according to the Los Angeles courts public information office.

An Aug. 24 hearing is scheduled to examine the matter further.
Click to expand...

Very cool aritcle, featuring a kick[Rule8] judge.
 
Tsukasa Buddha said:
Very cool aritcle, featuring a kick[Rule8] judge.
Click to expand...

Cool article, yes. Cool judge?
However, many legal experts predict the order won't stand up in court.

<snip>

Whereas restraining orders generally bar someone from having contact with a particular person, this one "is tantamount to house arrest," Volokh said. "There is no way anyone can organize their life to make sure they stay 10 yards away from all minors at all times, and they certainly can't even go to court to challenge it."

The temporary restraining order was also given without McClellan's even being notified that there was a hearing, Volokh added.
Click to expand...

Slapped with a restraining order without being able to present his case? Indeed, without any law itself being broken?

I shudder to think of the world that could be created when a judge can sentence you, without requiring any crime, without hearing your case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom