June 2007 Stundie Nominations

I was tempted by that one, but was sure it would be debunked by william rea faster than a 'truther' can produce a film for mainstream cinema release with global distribution and a celebrity voiceover.
 
LUCUS said:
In person I am a force to be reckoned with now. I have so many facts about 911 there is not a person who can go up against me now.
Every single person who I have confronted about 911 in the past 2 months that gives me any "flack" has either been left speechless, eventually agrees, or just gives up.
I have become a wall of truth they can't break through.
I just want my one shot at Bill Oreilly. God just give me some miracle please that gets me the chance at his mangy carcass.
Give me one 1/2 hour debate with Oreilly and take mic control away from him and I will make him my personal bitch.
When you know so many facts and can say them in a bold assertive way there is no stopping it.
Bring it on Oreilly, Malken, or Hannity.
Click to expand...

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11105
 
While discussing the new Purdue University 3-D simulation regarding the fires at the WTC, Mark Dice comes up with this gem...

Mark Dice @ LCF said:
and what about tower two where the plane just knicked the corner of the building and all fuel blow out the side?
Click to expand...

Apparently the south tower experienced, what Mark believes is tantamount to, a mere "shaving accident" from the impact of flight 175.
 

Attachments

  • nicked.jpg
    nicked.jpg
    96 KB · Views: 14
Last edited:
Non Believer is going to have some issues with unit conversion in this problem:

Non Believer said:
... For the computation for the energy. You need to first add the estimates that NIST made for the damage done by the planes. then subtract that from the total amount of energy provided by the impact. At the point you no longer have enough energy to provide for the removal of the fireproofing. ...
Click to expand...
 
Foolmewunz said:
If I could figure out what this means, I might nominate it (except that it's not worthy of Roxdog's major works).

Does anyone know if there's some pet Anti-NWO concept out there that says that Ford was never Nixon's veep (see bolded part)?
Click to expand...
i think the idea is that the 25th amendment to the constitution is unconstitional (however that works) on the grounds that it allows a president to essentially be appointed rather than elected (the manner in which ford became president actually, spiro agnew resigned, and ford was appointed VP, then nixon resigned and ford became president)
 
MaGZ almost made me regurgitate my supper with that one:

MaGZ said:
Hyperviolet said:
Dont feel offended Jack. I questioned this not long ago and found out that there are lot of deniers like "Reich Stag Fire Deniers," "Pearl Harbour Deniers" and "JFK deniers" etc etc. Its a lot broader term than you think. Its not just given to Holocaust and 9/11.
Click to expand...
Add Missile Denier to the list.
Click to expand...
 
Ah friendly canuck has a problem.

I'm in a discussion on another board and I've been using the Danny Jowenko WTC7 vidoeclip to support the CD theory for WTC7. Now someone on this other board has thrown THIS video back in my face. So now I've got a problem... if I accept Danny's WTC7 theory, then I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't accept his WTC1 and 2 theories.

Basically I'm asking for help on this one!
Click to expand...

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11104

The double think that follows as truthers try and back flip around this is very special.
 
Dave Rogers said:
I like Einsteen's reply.



I think he'd be pretty certain it wasn't a Van Gogh.

Dave
Click to expand...



That's a pretty stupid analogy. Identifying the works of famous painters is pretty basic. Heck, in 5th form at High School we had to study different artists and then produce work that mimicked their style as part of the art curriculum.

I am confident I could easily distinguish between Baroque (Rembrandt) and Post-Impressionism (van Gogh). I have no doubt my mother (BFA) could easily identify works specific to those artists. An expert in any particular European art movement or artist could no doubt do it in their sleep.

This is not so for building collapses and demolitions. The fact is, a demolition is a building collapse. The basic elements in both cases are identical. Demolition simply uses various methodologies (such as explosives) to control the collapse. That's really the only distinction.

-Gumboot
 
This one needs no commentary

LUCAS @ LCF said:
I bet we can get over 1000 people to sue the US government for destroying our country, it's wages platform, and our standard of living.

I bet we can sue them for upwords of 50 billion dollars.

I am not kidding. I am going to do this.

It is provable that they are allowing the illegals in on purpose. All we need is about 1000 dedicated people and a good lawyer who wants to get rich.

I already have 3 people and I have not even started.

Hit them in the pocket...that's where I am going from now on.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • sue.jpg
    sue.jpg
    103.2 KB · Views: 5
Lucas by HyJinX said:
All we need is about 1000 dedicated people and a good lawyer who wants to get rich.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Who cares about being right. It's a cash thing.

Probably the same kind of person who wails against "big business".
 
Illegal immigration is destroying our country, but frivolous class action lawsuits? Why, that's just being a true, red-blooded American patriot!
 
gumboot said:
That's a pretty stupid analogy. Identifying the works of famous painters is pretty basic. Heck, in 5th form at High School we had to study different artists and then produce work that mimicked their style as part of the art curriculum.

I am confident I could easily distinguish between Baroque (Rembrandt) and Post-Impressionism (van Gogh). I have no doubt my mother (BFA) could easily identify works specific to those artists. An expert in any particular European art movement or artist could no doubt do it in their sleep.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...
Hell, pigeons can learn to distinguish between cubism and impressionism:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4225341.stm
http://www.answers.com/topic/discrimination-abilities-of-pigeons
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom