• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Over Unity is No Longer Disputable

Lots of harping on about the supposed credentials (ooh look, real scientists! Cool-looking turbines!) and general obfuscation. Brace of loonies stands by in the comments section to pull Leonardo gambits. Do not want :(

What? What are you in denial about?

Tell us what facts you dispute in a clear scientific manner.

I stated no laws have been broken. The energy is not created it is harnessed.
 
Well, let's see. Have you ever heard the old expression "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence?"

The only evidence I see in that video is the video producers' say-so.

"No longer disputable?" My patooty!
 
Please try to escape scientific dogma and be a leader.

"Just like a boat in calm waters and good sunshine. If a scientist did not know how to use solar panels, he might have ignored the light energy and applied the Law of Conservation of Energy in what he thought was a CLOSED system. He might advocate rowing using muscle energy."

We are immersed in electromagnetic waves (and gravitational pulls) and exchange such energies constantly. Electromagnetic waves come from the orbiting electrons of atoms. Unless these electrons stop rotating and fall into the nucleus, there will be Electromagnetic Wave Exchanges. (Some call this a form of Zero Point Energy.)

The Law of Conservation of Energy has been misapplied by scientist and patent offices for centuries as demonstrated by “the boat in calm water and good sunshine” example.
 
Well, let's see. Have you ever heard the old expression "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence?"

The only evidence I see in that video is the video producers' say-so.

"No longer disputable?" My patooty!

This is not an acceptable answer.

What specific claims do you dispute? Just because you don't understand something does not automatically make it incorrect.:boggled:

If you want to dispute something, please feel free to do so, but replies like that show only ignorance.
 
What specific claims do you dispute?

Well I for one dispute the "free energy" claim. They claim to have turned thermodynamics on its ear. Where is the evidence? A verbal claim in a video obviously designed to entice investors doesn't cut it.
 
Mac d please sell everything you have and invest heavily in this! We won't be sorry!! Be sure to send us updates on your dividends and new lifestyle!!!!! Best, Me :)
 
Mac d please sell everything you have and invest heavily in this! We won't be sorry!! Be sure to send us updates on your dividends and new lifestyle!!!!! Best, Me :)

Thats the best you can do? Did you try looking up this technology?

You are trying to hide your ignorance behind skepticism. Let's say you have succeeded, we can't tell you're stupid even though you are. Now what?

http://www.gammamanager.com/question.html

BTW I don't need a new lifestyle, my current one is just fine, thank God for all my blessings. I am currently looking into buying this.

http://www.polarisindustries.com/en-us/Ranger/RangerRZR/Experience/
 
Last edited:
Thats the best you can do? Did you try looking up this technology?

You are trying to hide your ignorance behind skepticism. Let's say you have succeeded, we can't tell you're stupid even though you are. Now what?

http://www.gammamanager.com/question.html

If it's a certain, proven thing, why not put all your money into it?

What claims have they made in enough detail to rebut? I have an invisible pink unicorn in my garage. Care to rebut that, scientifically?
 
If it's a certain, proven thing, why not put all your money into it?

What claims have they made in enough detail to rebut? I have an invisible pink unicorn in my garage. Care to rebut that, scientifically?

Nope.:cool:

Hey look my mistake. Go back to your pathetic lives please. You seem to enjoy them just the way they are.

I guess it won't bother me any.
 
Last edited:
My opinions can best be summarized by a MST3K style annotation of the video. Feel free to read this while watching it.

Video: "EBM Technology"
me: "It's one vowel better than IBM!"
Video: "Similar to large motors and generators"
me: And Here's one of those standard motors right now!
Video: "when one measures the Combined electrical and heat output..."
me:Because heat generation is what you want when you are trying to beat thermodynamics!
Video:"new source of energy is extracted and utilized due to its unusual geometry and high iron loss!"
me:umm, what's an iron loss.. is the device anemic?

that's as far as I got before the stupid started to hurt.
 
Last edited:
Thats the best you can do? Did you try looking up this technology?

You are trying to hide your ignorance behind skepticism. Let's say you have succeeded, we can't tell you're stupid even though you are. Now what?

http://www.gammamanager.com/question.html

It feels like there have been lots of people trying to obliquely advertise their junk lately. Why is this? Is there some sort of thieves den for shady advertisers that lists accessible forums with reasonably high web impact?

Not that this necessarily applies to you, g4macdad. I'm entirely willing to assume you were honestly impressed by the techno-babble on that website. You've referenced it, but reading through it tells me nothing other than someone is asserting they can generate power in a fundamentally new way that turns all our current knowledge on its ears. Oh, and of course you can find out more if you sign an NDA and arrange for a demonstration, all for a small fee. What did you find particularly compelling on this website?
 
Last edited:
I, for one, believe that this machine works. It does not create "free" energy; it harnesses energy from a parallel universe increasing the total available energy in our universe but also increasing entropy across the entire multiverse (like a solar cell harnesses the sun's energy to increase available energy on earth but offset by draining energy from the sun). The single problem with this technology is that it may destroy a parallel universe in which other copies of ourselves are fighting to survive including, but not limited to, Dr. Rodney McCay who might need the help of his own sister to reverse the damage. And that's not the amazing part. The amazing part is that his sister is played by David Hewlett's ACTUAL FRICKIN' SISTER!

Oh brave, new world ...
 
Why were so many of the scientific sentences in the video such nonsense? I've seen more realistic conversation about computers on an episode of 24.

Loss Leader, if what you say it true, we are actually taking energy from other parallel universes. Sign me up for the universe wars!
 

Back
Top Bottom