Dustin Kesselberg
Illuminator
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2004
- Messages
- 4,669
From now on I won't reply to people who make vague assertions and who don't provide clear examples and quote exactly what they are referring to after the make the assertions.
From now on I won't reply to people who make vague assertions and who don't provide clear examples and quote exactly what they are referring to after the make the assertions.
So, I take it that you don't have any real evidence that your god exists, Dustin?
Read the OP.
Ok, so you don't have any real evidence that your god exists. Thanks.
Get your paper published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and get back to me about your OP. I got as far as your silly Descarte proved that the individual exists, and maybe a god-demon and realized that the rest of the post is probably just as silly. When you come up with real evidence that your god exists, feel free to show it.
There's nothing wrong with that. I assumed God existed to see if his non-existence was more or less consistent. Then I showed that he couldn't possibly not exist therefore he must exist.
Every part of it, from beginning to end, is nonsense of the first order.If anyone has anything specific to say regarding my post, quotes included, then I'd be more than happy to respond.
Do you honestly think that you have done this? I really can't tell if the whole OP is a complex wind-up, or if you genuinely believe in this statement.
Unfair to Sir Humphrey, you mean? An Oxford man would eschew such prolixity.
Depends on how one defines "faith". If faith is defined as belief without evidence, who would want that?![]()
You, apparently. Others are just honest with themselves about this.
Get your paper published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and get back to me about your OP. I got as far as your silly Descarte proved that the individual exists, and maybe a god-demon and realized that the rest of the post is probably just as silly. When you come up with real evidence that your god exists, feel free to show it.
I already have. If you're not intelligent enough to understand Cartesian philosophy then I doubt you're intelligent enough to understand some of the more complex aspects of my post. It's probably best you stopped reading, you wouldn't have understood it anyway.
No. I base my beliefs on established facts and evidence. See my OP. I've shown that God exists.
What established facts and evidence?No. I base my beliefs on established facts and evidence.
Well.... No. No, sorry to say, Dustin, that you have not done this after all. Your premises are unsupported and your logic is invalid, as has been explained to you by everyone here.See my OP. I've shown that God exists.