• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Same missile?

'zat you, Christophera?

WTC 7 ablaze! (Funny how WTC 7's fire alarm didn't go off until 10:00, and not a single person reported a fire there until after this photo was taken, isn't it?)
 
MaGZ said:
The last time I saw this footage was about two or three years ago on the anniversary coverage of 9/11 on the Arab news digest program Mosaic on Link TV. I think Sky News distributed this footage internationally. I hope with the upcoming anniversary they show it again. I think there is a good chance television coverage in the Middle East and Asia may show the footage.

It is apparently being suppressed in this country now, although it was shown often after 9/11.
Click to expand...

Video footage of a missile stirking WTC 7 is being suppressed in this country, but no one else around the world with the footage has come forward to point out this strange missile strike? Why would that be? Why, if anyone actually had footage of a MISSILE STRIKING WTC 7 not show it to anyone else?

The WTC 7 missile theory is based purely on assumptions. The "fires" you describe in pictures prior to the South Towers collapse aren't fires. Remember in one of the other threads you made about this "missiles at ground zero" theory where a firefighter with over 40 years of experience said they look NOTHING like fires?

"Permit a firefighter with 43 years experience including Chief of two departments and Training Officer of two others, and real live experience in hundreds of fires to answer that: NO, It does not look anything like fire."

Does he just not know what he's talking about?

A missile striking WTC 7 after the South Tower was struck wouldn't go unreported. Yet is has...wonder why that would be, was the news being suppressed by the time the South Tower was struck?
 
MaGZ said:
Blue Monk,
Thanks for providing the large clip. Clearly the object is in front of both towers. However, I am not convinced it is a bird. If the object did not travel in a straight line you might have a good argument. Also, I suspect the object you presented is not in real time: the explosion appears to be in slow-motion. If it is a missile, it appears to have missed WTC 7: the building that I am convinced was hit.
Click to expand...

You're missing the point.

The only way to determine the size and speed of an unknown object is to view it from a separate angle.

Since that event was captured from many angles that should be a snap except that it appears in no other view where it clearly should be if it were a missile or anything large.

The only possible explanation for why the object appears in one view yet not another from only a slightly different angle is that the object is small and passed near and in front off only one camera.

The key is not to focus on and analyze only that viewing, but rather to view the other angles and ask yourself why this object is not visible.
 
Blue Monk said:
You're missing the point.

The only way to determine the size and speed of an unknown object is to view it from a separate angle.

Since that event was captured from many angles that should be a snap except that it appears in no other view where it clearly should be if it were a missile or anything large.

The only possible explanation for why the object appears in one view yet not another from only a slightly different angle is that the object is small and passed near and in front off only one camera.

The key is not to focus on and analyze only that viewing, but rather to view the other angles and ask yourself why this object is not visible.
Click to expand...

The only explaination for something being in one video, and not another is that the government took all of the others and removed it, but they forgot about one. Oops. :)
 
Unfit4Command said:
The only explaination for something being in one video, and not another is that the government took all of the others and removed it, but they forgot about one. Oops. :)
Click to expand...


Yeah, someone really dropped the ball on that one, hehe.
 
Magz, could you tell us what kind of ATA missile it was? Maybe one I did not highlight in an above post? And explain what damage it would do to a building, other that chips of concrete and some broken windows? Or are you just going to continue to ignore anything that does not fit into your conspiracy theory? I mean now you imply media suppression of something that should be the video of the century (if it was true).

Care to answer any of these?
 
MaGZ said:
None of you seem to be very analytical. Obviously the object could not be a bird since it was moving too fast. But these little details don’t seem to bother anyone here.

Also, no helicopter flew over the plaza at the time of the second impact. To the best of my knowledge one helicopter was northwest and another one was southwest of the WTC complex.

Where are the critical thinkers?
Click to expand...
How fast is the object moving? Please state how you come to your estimate of its speed.

Hans
 
Magz, you have many questions here. Might I suggest you take the time to answer each to the best of your ability? Object size, speed, range to target, (supposed) aircraft type, (supposed) ordnance fired, etc.
 
MaGZ said:
Gravy,
Take a look at the Naudet video of the crowd of people at Vesey and Church and ask yourself why the video shows a cut a few seconds after the crash of the second plane into WTC 2 and then the cameraman is running north on Church. I believe if the film was not cut you would see the missile explosion into WTC 7. Late you see the white cloud of smoke from the missile strike.
Click to expand...

Do you plan on inventing MORE videos like this ?

Don't go down the christophera road.
 
Obviously, these are both dogs. But are they the SAME dog?

5146466805de96863.jpg
 
Hey MaGZ.... Whenever you get around to posting that image of WTC7 on fire before the collapse of WTC2, that'd be swell.
 
JC Fla said:
Magz, could you tell us what kind of ATA missile it was? Maybe one I did not highlight in an above post? And explain what damage it would do to a building, other that chips of concrete and some broken windows? Or are you just going to continue to ignore anything that does not fit into your conspiracy theory? I mean now you imply media suppression of something that should be the video of the century (if it was true).

Care to answer any of these?
Click to expand...


In the Fox footage, I saw the missile hit in the area of the 14th floor of WTC 7. What was caught on camera as the cameraman fell was not smoke from the impact but instead debris shooting away from the building at an incredible speed. It appeared as if steel beams were flying thru the air. Other than that, I have no idea what type of missile it was.

I should add that at the time–when I first saw the footage a few days after 9/11–I really did not make the connection of the blast being a missile impact. Later on with the Drudge link of the missile was I able to make the connection.

I think the ambiguity of the footage is the reason it was not censored in the early days after 9/11.
 
Last edited:
MaGZ said:
In the Fox footage, I saw the missile hit in the area of the 14th floor of WTC 7. What was caught on camera as the cameraman fell was not smoke from the impact but instead debris shooting away from the building at an incredible speed. It appeared as if steel beams were flying thru the air. Other than that, I have no idea what type of missile it was.

I should add that at the time–when I first saw the footage a few days after 9/11–I really did not make the connection of the blast being a missile impact. Later on with the Drudge link of the missile was I able to make the connection.

I think the ambiguity of the footage is the reason it was not censored in the early days after 9/11.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


Censored, that is, by the networks who love Bush and support the struggle against the jihadists so whole-heartedly. What a dunce you are.
 
JC Fla said:
Magz, you have many questions here. Might I suggest you take the time to answer each to the best of your ability? Object size, speed, range to target, (supposed) aircraft type, (supposed) ordnance fired, etc.
Click to expand...

The F-15s from Otis were the aircraft that fired the missiles.
 
Last edited:
If the light from those floors was indeed from fire.....where is the smoke?

I see none.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom