• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
How does Senator Jay Rockefeller fit into this NWO conspiracy? He has been one of the ones who wants to get at the bottom of all the false intelligence reports that led us to invade Iraq.
 
CptColumbo said:
Fair enough.

Bolding mine. Hopefully in the present. If your in the future, can you PM me some lotto numbers?
Click to expand...

23-16-45-12-18-33

2008 Rose Bowl: Illinois 55, USC 12
2008 Super Bowl: Chicago Bears 63, Indianapolis 3
 
CptColumbo said:
Sorry. I think 5th dimensionally sometimes.
Click to expand...
Ah, I'm going to take that break you mentioned earlier.

Chance to use the great kitty pic!

stubidz.jpg


Rolfe. :c1:
 
MaGZ said:
How does Senator Jay Rockefeller fit into this NWO conspiracy? He has been one of the ones who wants to get at the bottom of all the false intelligence reports that led us to invade Iraq.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


He isn't talking about a real human with the surname "Rockefeller." Come to think of it, he hasn't the slightest idea of what he's talking about.

Have you found any more missiles?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
I know what a verb transitive is.
Click to expand...
Emphasis mine.

I've been meaning to ask: Is that one of those curious British-isms, like the backwards "er" in "theatre" or driving on the left? Or did he mean something other than "transitive verb" like we have here on this side of the puddle?
 
I've never heard it. It's probably just another example of him managing to get even the slightest thing utterly wrong.
 
PhantomWolf said:
So then the Barracks, Embassies and Cole were real terrorists, or were they done by the Illuminati? Oh, oh oh, I know, they were done by the shape shifting reptiles that are in competition to the NWO. Let me guess the Reptiles do all the bombings outside the US, like the London Subway, the Midrid and Indian trains, the Bali Nightclubs, the Jordan Hotels, the Turkey Bank, and Marocco, where as the NWO is invloved in all the bombings in the US, such as Oklahoma, the '93 WTC, the Atlanta Oympics, and the Uni-Bomber.

It all makes sense now. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You're definately getting warmer. They use the MSM to manufacture an enemy, then they tell you that you need to lose your civil liberties, in order to protect your freedom.
Which is a play on words. I'm taking your freedom away, in order to protect it = No, you're just taking my freedom away. Better than that, they control both sides. There will never be war, until someone has the money for it, or the potential to pay for it on HP (loans).
Mimi Rothschilde said before the outbreak of WW1, "If my sons don't want war, then there'll be no war".
It's all to do with money lending. Lend both sides money to buy bullets, while the war is on. Then lend both sides money to buy bricks, when the war is over. Who gives a rat's corpse who wins?
Beginning to cotton on a bit, are we?
All this in Iraq etc, has nothing to do with oil and everything to do with money lending.
 
Civilized Worm said:
I've never heard it. It's probably just another example of him managing to get even the slightest thing utterly wrong.
Click to expand...


That's the advantage of summer when school's out. He just gets to sit at home up in his room and make stuff up.

I hope he remembers to lock his door so mom can't disturb him unexpectedly.


...or maybe that's someone's stinky :socks: I smell.
 
jsfisher said:
Emphasis mine.

I've been meaning to ask: Is that one of those curious British-isms, like the backwards "er" in "theatre" or driving on the left? Or did he mean something other than "transitive verb" like we have here on this side of the puddle?
Click to expand...
.
No such a thing as a transitive verb, although I'm confident you're gonna stick up some definition, as with stereotyping.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
You're definately getting warmer. They use the MSM to manufacture an enemy, then they tell you that you need to lose your civil liberties, in order to protect your freedom.
Which is a play on words. I'm taking your freedom away, in order to protect it = No, you're just taking my freedom away.
Click to expand...

So.... what freedoms have you lost lately? I know I haven't lost any, iin fact over here our Government keeps dishing them out like lollies.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
.
No such a thing as a transitive verb, although I'm confident you're gonna stick up some definition, as with stereotyping.
Click to expand...

Wrong.

Someone needs to smack this idiot with a rolled up newspaper every time he says stupid **** like this. It's the only way he'll learn.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
.
No such a thing as a transitive verb, although I'm confident you're gonna stick up some definition, as with stereotyping.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


Fascinating. So, we've established that all the grammarians in the English-speaking world are mistaken in their belief that verbs may be transitive or intransitive. I assume there is no such thing as a noun. What about an adjective?

Are elephants real, or are they as imaginary as your military "bad boys"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom