How-do, y'all! It's The Stundies!
Righto, the rules are working well, but there are a few clarifications to be made, as well as basic rule regarding video entries.
I present, the new and improved rules ofFight Club Teh 28th Annual Stundie Awards:
To help clarify the new rules (two and six)...
If you have any questions regarding the eligibility of a nominations (or potential nomination), don't worry, just ask. After all, that's how the two new rules came about this month.
So what are you waiting for? Get to it! Nominate, yah!
Righto, the rules are working well, but there are a few clarifications to be made, as well as basic rule regarding video entries.
I present, the new and improved rules of
- Nominations should always be accompanied by a link or a screenshot, to confirm that the quote exists and has not been taken out of context. (It would be wise to always have a backup screenshot, as truth movement forums are well known for deleting entire threads.)
- For a nomination to be eligible, it must have a real and obvious link to conspiracy theories, but not exclusively 9/11 conspiracy theories.
- Stundie nominations should 'stand alone'. Do not over-embellish introductions, but do provide comments. Do not use any blatant ad hominem attacks.
- Please post the nomination under the real screenname of the nominee, and not under a slightly altered name (e.g. Killclown, Roxpup, Do-over).
- The best Stundie nominations are short and sweet. As a guideline, no more than 6 lines should be included from the post. If you are giving context, highlight the actual nomination.
- Entire videos are not eligible for nomination. Specific statements or claims from videos are eligible for nomination.
- No long rants. Cut them down to the funniest bit.
- No speeling mistikes. Everybody makes a mistake once in a while!
To help clarify the new rules (two and six)...
According to rule two, the following would be eligible:
Directly discussing a conspiracy theory.
dumguy1 said:If they hadn't blown up WTC7 then ppl would hav found teh explosives in there!!111eleventyoneness! SHILL1
Ironic, hypocritical, or other appropriate statements made by members or leaders of the truth movement.
Dylan Avery said:Buy my new video and find out how Mark Roberts is profiting off the deaths of thousands of innocent people! That'll be twenty pieces of eight, thanks.
The following would not be eligible:
Skeptical issue not involving a conspiracy theory.
dumguy2 said:Of course Sylvia Browne's a real psychic! Otherwise she wouldn't be so rich, would she?
According to rule six, the following would not be eligible:
noobnominator said:Hey guys, I nominate the following video for the Stundies: http://www.youtube.com/notarealurl/
The following would be eligible:
1337nominator said:Hey guys, I nominate the following:
It comes from this video - http://www.youtube.com/notarealurl/dumguy3 said:The twin towers had cheese cores, and they collapsed because of specially trained New World Order mice that ate them. My cat's breath smells like cat food.
If you have any questions regarding the eligibility of a nominations (or potential nomination), don't worry, just ask. After all, that's how the two new rules came about this month.
So what are you waiting for? Get to it! Nominate, yah!
Mobyseven
Democratically Elected Tyrant
Democratically Elected Tyrant
Last edited: