[Merged]architects and engineers for 9/11 truth = SCAM!

The list of architects is getting smaller by the hour, Norman Foster and Gordon Freeman have both left the house, in disgust.
Did I hear that the bannings have already begun?
 
scissorhands said:
The list of architects is getting smaller by the hour, Norman Foster and Gordon Freeman have both left the house, in disgust.
Did I hear that the bannings have already begun?
Click to expand...

Ah the purges... Nothing says "I'm trying to find the truth" like banning polite dissent.
 
Mr. Skinny said:
So don't call me old........
Click to expand...

I ain't sayin' nothin', cause in a few years I'll look at those newfangled kids with their newfangled holographic reality simulators that I can't stand and I'm going to feel old. ;)


JamesB said:
I was walking through Srebrenica once, which is still pretty much trashed from the war. Bombed out buildings and such. Only about 10% of the population had returned at the time. Anyway... I came across this little Internet cafe, one of the few businesses in town, and looked inside to see a bunch of teenagers blowing each other way in Half Life. Kinda sureal.
Click to expand...

That is incredibly surreal.


Tbone said:
Needed more Ravenholme.


But with less of those poison headcrab throwing zombies and more circular saw blades.
Click to expand...

If by "less of" you mean "none" then I totally agree with you. I hated those stupid things.


Corsair 115 said:
Did the G-Man finally get Gordon Freeman off of the list?
Click to expand...

Yes, he appears to have finally been removed. He should've been listed a physicist though, not an architect. :)
 
This is classic. And they wonder why noone takes them seriously.

TAM:)
 
Hi I'm new here but I have to share these emails to Richard Gage,


From: xxxxxxxxx [xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:03 AM
To: Richard Gage
Subject: {Spam?} Re: RE: WTC 7

Hi Richard;
Thanks for the response. The point I'm trying to make is why not show the complete collapse (WTC 7) on the home page (upper right corner). This seems deceptive because you only show part of the collapse then ask the question CD? The building didn't fall in 6.6 seconds right?



xxxxx- you are the only one I have ever heard so far who disagrees with the 6.5 second fall. Not even the debunkers challenge this. Richard


From: xxxxxxxxxx [xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:25 AM
To: Richard Gage
Subject: {Spam?} Re: RE: WTC 7


Richard;
This is the only fire picture of WTC 7 you have? Do you need me to send more? Glad to help. xxxxx



Yes, please send them xxxxxx. Thanks, Richard
 
it falls in approximately 6.5 to 8 seconds IF, IF you do not include any of the Penthouse collapse in your timing of it...

TAM:)

Edit: Welcome to the forum DGM.
 
T.A.M. said:
it falls in approximately 6.5 to 8 seconds IF, IF you do not include any of the Penthouse collapse in your timing of it...

TAM:)

Edit: Welcome to the forum DGM.
Click to expand...
[Emperor Palpatine voice]
Come to the Dork Side TAM. Replace your pathetic 'IF, IF' with 'IFF'.
[/Emperor Palpatine voice]
 
Well I would, would if I could, could if I should master palpatine.

TAM:)
 
DGM said:
Just a visit to his site and wanted to see if he would answer. I can't get over that I'm the first to question the time of collapse. Me and my 9 year old that is.
Click to expand...
I know, that's nuts. The fact that you're the "only one [he has] ever heard so far" question it simply means that he had no curiosity about any of the counter-arguments before embarking on "the warrior's path."
 
Welcome, DGM.

I was going to start a thread at aetruth about the WTC 7 collapse time issue, directed to Richard Gage, but I've been banned.

Gage is ignorant. I've never seen a "debunker" who didn't challenge the nonsensical 6.5-second collapse time claim. Feel free to shoot Gage the link to my paper about how the conspiracists make crap up about WTC 7:
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/introduction
 
Gravy said:
Welcome, DGM.

I was going to start a thread at aetruth about the WTC 7 collapse time issue, directed to Richard Gage, but I've been banned.

Gage is ignorant. I've never seen a "debunker" who didn't challenge the nonsensical 6.5-second collapse time claim. Feel free to shoot Gage the link to my paper about how the conspiracists make crap up about WTC 7:
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/introduction
Click to expand...

You've been banned already?! I'm impressed - it either means your reputation is more fearsome than I'd thought or the new site (and subsequent forum) will be more worthless than I'd anticipated.
 
AZCat said:
You've been banned already?! I'm impressed - it either means your reputation is more fearsome than I'd thought or the new site (and subsequent forum) will be more worthless than I'd anticipated.
Click to expand...
False dichotomy. :D

edit: The justification is hilarious. I think I'll nominate it for a Stundie:
Banned for unsuccessful attempts at skepticism and trolling
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
AZCat said:
You've been banned already?! I'm impressed - it either means your reputation is more fearsome than I'd thought or the new site (and subsequent forum) will be more worthless than I'd anticipated.
Click to expand...

They jumped on "Mark Roberts" in a heartbeat. Next to go was someone imitating PDOH. I can't believe that the person who hijacked "Roxdog" hasn't yet been banned (forcing Rox to use a zero, i.e. r0xdog in his name to fight for his inalienable rights to be an asshat)..... I'm not going to be there for long - challenging the mod idiots is not going to guarantee you a future, there.
(Never mind - regulars here will recognize my style - I'm socking it 'cuz "Foolmewunz" is a little too blatant.)

The blush is off the rose, by the way. No one visits, much less posts.... It's like a ghost town... the tumbleweeds are just rolling through....
 
Foolmewunz said:
The blush is off the rose, by the way. No one visits, much less posts.... It's like a ghost town... the tumbleweeds are just rolling through....
Click to expand...
But they have a name! And a website! That means architects and engineers are on their side...it does!
 
Gravy said:
Welcome, DGM.

I was going to start a thread at aetruth about the WTC 7 collapse time issue, directed to Richard Gage, but I've been banned.

Gage is ignorant. I've never seen a "debunker" who didn't challenge the nonsensical 6.5-second collapse time claim. Feel free to shoot Gage the link to my paper about how the conspiracists make crap up about WTC 7:
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/introduction
Click to expand...
I sent him your links plus a few others and about 27 8x10 color glossy photos. I also asked him if he heard of NIST(there seems to be a chart). Can't wait for the reply
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom