• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Moderated]175 did NOT hit the South tower.

Status
Not open for further replies.
T.A.M. said:
Dentists also have a high suicide rate as well, so I guess Malcolm isnt going to go for a cleaning any time soon...lol

TAM:)
Click to expand...
I did a search of some statistic sites and found that most agree, that getting any acurate data regarding suicides is hard. Most are not reported as suicides to spare families, and some areas do not list occupation on Death Certificates. In a study of 30,000 known suicides from 1984-88 (http://www.mail-archive.com/tips@fre.fsu.umd.edu/msg12177.html) it was found that Food Preparers were #1 followed closely by Healthcare Professionals (the various diciplines were not seperated). I found one site that said among Caucasians in the US, Physicians had the highest rate, and among African-Americans Guard/Law Enforcement had the highest rate.

Interesting stuff.
 
malcolm,

If what crashed into the Twin Tower was a pair of military 757's, what happened to the passengers and planes, that took off from their respective departure points?
 
CptColumbo said:
I did a search of some statistic sites and found that most agree, that getting any acurate data regarding suicides is hard. Most are not reported as suicides to spare families, and some areas do not list occupation on Death Certificates. In a study of 30,000 known suicides from 1984-88 (http://www.mail-archive.com/tips@fre.fsu.umd.edu/msg12177.html) it was found that Food Preparers were #1 followed closely by Healthcare Professionals (the various diciplines were not seperated). I found one site that said among Caucasians in the US, Physicians had the highest rate, and among African-Americans Guard/Law Enforcement had the highest rate.

Interesting stuff.
Click to expand...

kitten_die.jpg
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
malcolm,

If what crashed into the Twin Tower was a pair of military 757's, what happened to the passengers and planes, that took off from their respective departure points?
Click to expand...
Who am I, the man with all the answers?
All that I say is that 175 didn't hit the south tower, which it didn't.
One thing at a time, if you don't mind.
Do you concur that 175 did not hit the south tower?
Do you agree that 175 was part of the cover up and not part of the real attack?
 
malcolm kirkman said:
Let's hear your plan.
Click to expand...
How quickly you forget, but I guess I could be nice and flesh it out a bit more...

  • Recruit me some jihadists
  • Have them trained as pilots
  • Have them acquire jobs as airline pilots in the US
  • Find a good day when I have pilots in the air in reasonable proximity to intended targets
  • Have them fly their planes into my targets

Advantages compared to your plan:
  • Involves far fewer people needing to know what is going on, so there is less chance of a leak beforehand
  • Excepting myself, all those in the know die, greatly reducing the chance of a leak afterward
  • What I want people to see and what actually will happen (planes flying into buildings) are the same thing. I need not worry about any discrepancies between the two.
  • Cheaper

Disadvantages compared to your plan:
  • Boring, with a distinct lack of kookiness

Please note that the above is not what I believe happened, merely a better plan than yours.

ETA: Oops, nearly forgot... What happened to the USS Columbia?
 
Last edited:
Redtail said:
kitten_die.jpg
Click to expand...
Take that gun away from that kat! Our cat could pull the trigger. She opens doors; I guess she could shoot the deer for me when they eat the roses, and wing the skunk when he visits every night. She could shoot the car that hit her, making her the 1000 dollar cat (not shooting, but the repairs to her legs made her the 1000 dollar cat).

You could stop letting your cat read the post from mr mensa.
 
Last edited:
malcolm kirkman said:
Who am I, the man with all the answers?
Click to expand...
I don't think anyone here would accuse you of that.
All that I say is that 175 didn't hit the south tower, which it didn't.
Click to expand...
If you make a statement like this however, we do require you to explain yourself and provide the evidence to support it, which you haven't.
One thing at a time, if you don't mind.
Do you concur that 175 did not hit the south tower?
Do you agree that 175 was part of the cover up and not part of the real attack?
Click to expand...
No, and no. Not from the evidence you've provided.
 
malcolm kirkman said:
My pleasure. A few bits for starters. Govt policy is, because there's a war on, that all hardwear is obsolete after two years. Irrespective of usage. So you can pick a (military) 757 up for peanuts.
The military 757,
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/e-767-awfwdc.jpg
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/e-767.htm
Click to expand...
Click to expand...


Uh, the problem, you may have noticed, is that these are actual Boeing airliners with sophisticated radar systems added. They are most definitely NOT super-strong, and no one thinks they are. So, it's back to the original question. Not that we think you don't have the slightest idea of what you're talking about, or anything...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom