• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Merged]architects and engineers for 9/11 truth = SCAM!

This makes me wonder what he's going to do when he realizes the stupidity of his error- will he actually check credentials, or just remove people he believes to be "suspect"?

Someone should actually enter some real architects/engineers, with real credentials- and then call them and have them sue him. If he doesn't check credentials, he's responsible for the slander. Plus, it will just throw a wrench in any future attempts to allow the slush in.

As I suspected- he's just gone in and removed the obvious ones- instead of rethinking the admittance policy altogether. This means that there are still plenty of individuals on there that don't exist, or do not agree with the ae911truth site. They really do think they are more popular than they really are.

Are we allowed to scream censorship, though? Someone has to speak on behalf of McGruff the Crimefighting Dog...
 
Man that site is dumb. I'm not even a structual engineer (And hey, I guess they aint either) and I can point out obvious flaws in every single one of their points.

Fires not big
6.5 seconds claim
Explosionzz!!1
etc etc.

It is amusing how CTers take the FDNY's gospel truth on "molten steel" when they are quite happy to simply ignore mounds and mounds of eyewitness testimony to the contrary on WTC7 clearly not coming down in a controlled demolition.
 
"Sorry -- Temporarily disabled due to immature, asinine spammers."

sadly Kodos was the first to go, there will be retaliation to the humans no doubt
 
Anytime the "Twoofers" whine and complain about JREFers and other skeptics organizing (pointing out a way to show a flaw in a CT site) to spam a site, I just remember how they celebrated the shutting down of the United 93 forum, and don't feel bad at all.

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the internet... or plan your site better.
 
Anytime the "Twoofers" whine and complain about JREFers and other skeptics organizing (pointing out a way to show a flaw in a CT site) to spam a site, I just remember how they celebrated the shutting down of the United 93 forum, and don't feel bad at all.

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the internet... or plan your site better.

And there's no way "we" were generating enough traffic to cause problems- it's just that the ease with which one could claim credentials and never have them verified really showed the fundamental flaw of the whole conspiracy movement.

He was obviously embarrassed by that.

Hey, we organized for truth! Are they ashamed of the truth?
 
His web site tells lies, why not have fake people to go with the fake facts.

The Undersigned - a list of people unable to understand 9/11 and they are now all promoting lies. What a list.

Some of them are 50s, late 50s, they are BS kings and care less about facts, do not let fact mess with, or get in the way of my political goals you fools. These guys have losts their marbles and have no clue what they are doing. (mr skinny and beachnut are exempt)
 
Last edited:
Sorry -- Temporarily disabled due to immature, asinine spammers.

Sorry -- Temporarily disabled due to immature, asinine spammers. We apologize for them and the inconvenience.

They are now apologizing for those dumb spammers, Should read

Sorry -- We had some fake people register, it would not be right to have fake people and fake evidence. Would it?

Sorry -- Some people on the list, like Atta, know for sure we are telling lies; we can not have that.
 
Mark Iradian, Structural Engineer
Canada City, ONT

Still up there.
 
Damn them and their anti-spam measures.

Archibald "Harry" Tuttle seriously supports the 9/11 Truth movement. He's an HVAC Engineer, you know. :)
 
Note: Until further notice, your name will not be shown on the list of supporters until you have been verified as a valid identity. This is merely an anti-spamming measure.

Does this mean they will check the validity of all previous entries?
I doubt it.
 

Back
Top Bottom