• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

architects and engineers for truth, population 1

PhantomWolf said:
I'm sure you have already, but get him to explain the different audios.
Click to expand...

A CT'er in the thread made a good case that it was faked. Several accept it as a fake, but others do not.

I just can't understand how an educated professional like Gage could use it. It is either fake or it is the smoking gun of 911. Why put is so far into a presentation?

It explains his mindset. He's so convinced of inside job that he can't tell what is devastating evidence and what is just contributory evidence. It's all the same to him. Pathetic.
 
Gravy said:
A breathtaking collection of idiots had gathered there: Pdoherty, roxdog, Chucksheen, Ace Baker, 28th Kingdom.
Click to expand...

It will be interesting to see what they do about the 'so called debunkers'. They've hinted they will have an internal discussion. Wonder if they will be concerned about idiots like 28k?

Roxdog did snipe at Pdoherty in my thread there.
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
A breathtaking collection of idiots has gathered there: Pdoherty, roxdog, Chucksheen, Ace Baker, 28th Kingdom.
Click to expand...

Wow! I mean, freakin' dazzling!

Let's have a contest. We'll add Christophera, Swing Dumpster, Killclown, and Pagan to the mix and try to come up with the most colorful group noun along the lines of "an exhaltation of larks."

My submissions:

A drool of morons

A ward of psychos

A cupboard of crackpots

A density of ignoramuses

A flock of loons

A Uri of charlatans

This one doesn't count, but that whole group is the Gang with Kaleidoscope Eyes.
Click to expand...
 
A clutch of strawmen

Given how I got my username, I might be tempted to call them; "A brainache of Truthers".

But I do like "a siren of woos".
 
Why is it that all CT forums have the exact same format?

It's like the LC forums, but with basically no posters.
 
Horatius said:
I read that a a "snicker" of Truthers, like we're laughing at them, and thought it was great. But a "Snickers" of Truthers works just as well. So I vote for this, two burns for the price of one!

:)
Click to expand...

I wasn't sure if anyone would actually get it, so for those still scratching their heads, Snickers are sometimes tempting, but ultimately they are just a lot of nuts.
 
PhantomWolf said:
I wasn't sure if anyone would actually get it, so for those still scratching their heads, Snickers are sometimes tempting, but ultimately they are just a lot of nuts.
Click to expand...

I didn't get it. :blush: I like it, though. :D
 
pomeroo said:
Wow! I mean, freakin' dazzling!

Let's have a contest. We'll add Christophera, Swing Dumpster, Killclown, and Pagan to the mix and try to come up with the most colorful group noun along the lines of "an exhaltation of larks."

My submissions:

A drool of morons

A ward of psychos

A cupboard of crackpots

A density of ignoramuses

A flock of loons

A Uri of charlatans

This one doesn't count, but that whole group is the Gang with Kaleidoscope Eyes.
Click to expand...
A spandrel of paranoids

A holocaust of deniers


My favorites so far:
A drool of morons
A circle of jerks
A siren of woos
A clutch of strawmen
 
A fasces of fascists
A faggot (fagot) of homophobes
A sack of JAQs
A mass of free-fallers
A Hervé of no-planers
A sock of blockheads
A woo of conspiracists
A credulity of cultists
A dime bag of paranoiacs
A Hubbard of irrationalists
A Bolger of straw men
A vein of quote-miners
A burden of accusers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom