I prefer to tell them straight out that they have nothing. If they did, they'd publish it. They have zip, and they never will. No need to wait. They're full of it. Why mince words? If they want to prove me wrong, all they have to do is pony up. Til then, I stand by my word -- they're full of stuff and nonsense, no bones about it. They're liars and fools. Straight up, no chaser.
Well , that's really just a slightly more direct way of doing exactly what I said.
Basically it would go something like this;
Wayne and Garth say doodliliddle , doodiliddle.......
Twoofer: What about the
anonymous person who was supposedly on the scene? they said
this paraphrased quote! We videoed them saying it!
Intelligent person: When you show me the video, all the video not just the edited version, I will be able to comment on this. Until then I have nothing other than your own paraphrase or slant of what that person said. When will that be forthcoming?
Twoofer: We are working on the video.
Intelligent person: Go ahead, but I want to see the unedited interview from start to finish.
Twoofer: No, the raw footage will not be released.
Intelligent person: I cannot see any reason why not if you truly want me to render an opinion. However, your intransience at releaseing it is noted, along with all that might imply.
So when will we be able to see even the edited version of this interview?
Twoofer: I told you we are working on it. Probably in a month it'll be ready.
Intelligent person: Then I will have nothing to render an opinion on until that time when it is released.
Twoofer: I told you what he said.
Intelligent person: That is irrellevent to me wanting to hear it first hand. If you are going to discuss it then you will have to let people see it. If the whole video is not ready yet AND you want to discuss this one interview then post an ftp link to just that interview and we can discuus it.
Twoofer: You are twisting things and attempting to derail the discussion.
Intelligent person: On the contrary, you wish to discuss something that you will not let anyone else see. Therefore there is actually nothing to discuss and therefore no discussion to derail. When you are prepared to offer something concrete to discuss then we will do so.
__________________________________________________________________
Lyte did this with Robert T's statement. In the run up to the release of Pentacon he stated that Robert T. had given them rock solid evidence that the plane had not hit the Pentagon.
Even now Lyte states that Robert's statement about the plane rising to clear the traffic signage is clearly indicative that the plane flew over the Pentagon. He still maintains that Robert said that the fireball obscured his view of the impact. He had said all of this before the release but it is quite obvious that Robert's statement about the plane rising at all has a serious flaw, he was running and moving up an embankement at the time the plane was supposedly rising.
Lyte completely misappropriates what Robert states in regards to the impact being obscured. Robert says that it was "still" obscured when it hit, all he saw was the fireball. Lyte completly fails to follow up on this and ask where he thought the plane had hit the building(Robert truly believes it did hit), on a lower floor or a higher floor, and he fails to clarify what was obscuring his view of the impact.
Many of us were asking Lyte for months when the Pentacon would be released s o we could clarify just what Lyte was talking about and when he FINNALLY did, it was laughable the way he had been twisting and paraphraseing what his interviewees had said.